Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The thread from which Summorum Pontificum hangs
Renew America ^ | August 8, 2013 | Louie Verrecchio

Posted on 08/08/2013 5:20:08 PM PDT by ebb tide

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

1 posted on 08/08/2013 5:20:09 PM PDT by ebb tide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

hey guys I’m a (honorary) Baptist not a Roman Catholic but I agree it looks, brothers and sisters, like there is a problem here. the word of the Lord is not ‘yes and no.’


2 posted on 08/08/2013 5:26:03 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (The Lion of Judah will roar again if you give him a big hug and mean it. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide
Pope Francis, when he was a cardinal, didn't abide by Summorum Pontificum, so I don't see why he would as Pope. I don't see why any bishop who didn't want to, would go by it now. At the very least, it wouldn't be enforced. I didn't see many bishops around me honor it, while Pope Benedict was still around.
3 posted on 08/08/2013 5:30:15 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide
This brings us to the elephant in the room; neither does the current pope view them as equals, difference being, however, he seems rather obviously to hold the exact opposite opinion as his predecessor.

I have to disagree a little. At least the way I see it, it's not that Pope Francis sees the Novus Ordo as superior to the EF, it's that Pope Francis sees liturgy altogether as a distraction from the Church's mission. If it was easier to use the EF, and get rid of the NO, he'd do that. It just happens, that is not easier. I almost imagine he's just assume get rid of Mass altogether and replace it with something, "more productive."

4 posted on 08/08/2013 5:33:58 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

“I almost imagine he’s just assume get rid of Mass altogether and replace it with something, “more productive.”

You may be on to something. I’ve never seen an archbishop or Pope who is adverse to personally offering Holy Communion at his Masses.


5 posted on 08/08/2013 5:39:23 PM PDT by ebb tide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Wow, and I thought the thread was already terrible and then you have to add your spurious opinion.

I don’t know which is worth. Catholic reporting on FR or Catholic reporting on the MSM.


6 posted on 08/08/2013 5:46:54 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

Which church do you belong to?


7 posted on 08/08/2013 5:47:36 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

Roman Catholic Church. How about you?


8 posted on 08/08/2013 5:49:38 PM PDT by ebb tide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

What did I do? I just said what I observed.


9 posted on 08/08/2013 6:02:06 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

Same. Got any citations to back up your opinion?


10 posted on 08/08/2013 6:05:00 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Observed? You’ve been to mass with the pope?


11 posted on 08/08/2013 6:05:41 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

You first, Bub.


12 posted on 08/08/2013 6:13:06 PM PDT by ebb tide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

You’re the one making the assertion that Pope Francis doesn’t like to perform mass... Where’s the evidence for this?


13 posted on 08/08/2013 6:30:18 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

Didn’t say that. What I said was that he refuses to distribute Holy Communion at his Masses.

Look it up.


14 posted on 08/08/2013 7:05:50 PM PDT by ebb tide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

Your job is to prove that statement. Show me.


15 posted on 08/08/2013 7:07:24 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge
Don't tell me what my job is. Concentrate on you own. But for your further edification, here goes:

Why Pope Francis Doesn't Give Communion

Embarrassed?

16 posted on 08/08/2013 7:18:44 PM PDT by ebb tide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: ebb tide

Your source does not support your conclusion.

1. It was written less than 8 weeks into the papacy of Pope Francis. Apparently we can pick up his habits this early on into his papacy and form solid conclusions about them.

2. You oddly neglected to correctly distinguish between the consecration of the blessed sacrament. Francis, in every one of the masses he performs the consecration. What he sometimes refrains from doing is distributing the sacrament.

Why? As your own source says:

“He doesn’t wish to provide the photo opportunity by which those who are manifest sinners can use to justify their conduct”.

Something you did not manage to say earlier.

Your source needs to do some serious research into Catholicism so that they can properly understand what ‘consecration’ means.


18 posted on 08/08/2013 8:01:30 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

You know what bugs me about all this traditionalist navel-gazing? There’s a disturbingly ultramontanist tendency to minutely dissect every little statement and preference of Pope Francis and treat him as this superhuman legislator who can change the entire direction of the Church on a whim.

Does it make any difference what Francis’s opinion of the traditional Mass is? Really?

Summorum Pontificum is the law of the land. The 1962 Missal was never abrogated. Period. So let’s use its provisions to push as hard as we can for continued growth of the Latin Mass. And then if anyone—bishop or Pope—tries to curtail that, we patiently but firmly say at every turn “Sorry Your Excellency, this Mass is part of our right and heritage as Catholics and we are sticking to it.”

That’s it. No stomping our feet, no whining, no schism, just stick to what is right and don’t be cowed, and don’t let your obedience to the Teaching Authority of the Church make you forget that that authority has its due limitations, which *need to be respected* by the Pope and everyone else.

The whole reason we are in this mess is that too many of us just laid down and took it when Paul VI and the bishops completely gutted the Mass of the Ages. We are wrong, and foolish, as Catholics to act like the Pope is an absolutist monarch who can do whatever he wants with regard to the sacred liturgy. That idea has already done untold damage to the Church. Let’s abolish that from your minds, and start thinking of the Pope—and all of us really—as *custodians* of sacred tradition.


19 posted on 08/09/2013 3:03:20 AM PDT by Claud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
I don't see why any bishop who didn't want to, would go by it now. At the very least, it wouldn't be enforced.

I get what you're saying, but the bishops--good, bad, indifferent--aren't really even in the picture anymore according to the law. If a group comes together with a priest willing to say it...bam. That's all you need.

Now, I realize that bishops can make it uncomfortable and in some cases prohibitive to say the Latin Mass, but we have to shake off this indolent overreliance on centralized authority and just put out into the deep. We have to stop acting like we still have to grovel for the thing, instead of boldly claiming a right that all of us are entitled to.

20 posted on 08/09/2013 3:20:19 AM PDT by Claud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson