Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lesbian Couple Outraged -Vicar Says They're Not Both Moms of Baby (Church overrules vicar)
Creative Minority Report ^ | September 9, 2013 | Matthew Archbold

Posted on 09/09/2013 1:28:52 PM PDT by NYer

A lesbian couple claims a Church of England vicar refused to baptize a baby after they both insisted on being registered as the mother, according to the UK Telegraph.

Aimi, from Gosport, Hants, said: "Rev Gebauer sat there and told us no child could have parents of the same sex, no child could have two mothers.

"There was no way one of us was going to be listed as the Godparent. We are both Alfie's mum.

"He did all this for about 10 or 15 minutes and was asking us why we want Alfie brought into the church.

"I'm baptised Church of England, and Victoria is a Catholic. We want him to be brought up the same as we were."
Reverend George Gebauer said he'd be willing to write one down as the mother but not both. So they stormed out and it would appear they called the press as well.

And guess what, The Anglican Church quickly reversed the vicar's decision.

However, Ven Gavin Collins, Archdeacon of the Meon, said today he was happy for the christening to go ahead as planned - with both named as the mother...

“We have addressed the legal issue. As I understand it, her partner Victoria has full legal co-parental responsibility for Alfie. We can therefore enter their details onto the baptism register as ‘mother’ and ‘mother’, as they would like.

“I’m pleased that this issue has been resolved, and we look forward to welcoming Aimi, Victoria, Alfie and their friends and family. I’m sure it will be a great occasion as we welcome him into the Christian family.”
If you'd like to know why the Anglican Church is dying, here it is.


TOPICS: Catholic; Mainline Protestant; Moral Issues; Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS: anglican; catholic; homosexualagenda
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 09/09/2013 1:28:52 PM PDT by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick; GregB; Berlin_Freeper; SumProVita; narses; bboop; SevenofNine; Ronaldus Magnus; tiki; ...
Rev Gebauer – who has been a vicar for 40 years – said the couple's sexuality was not an issue and he was willing to carry out the baptism if the women agreed to record just one of them as mother.

"The couple are not even from our parish, so we could have informed their local church and directed them there instead. "We can only make sure the child is theirs. For all we know they may have pinched the child. "We suggested time and again that the natural mum be registered as mum.

It's all about tolerance only when it applies to them, ping!

2 posted on 09/09/2013 1:29:16 PM PDT by NYer ( "Run from places of sin as from the plague."--St John Climacus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer; Revolting cat!; GeronL
"I'm baptised Church of England, and Victoria is a Catholic. We want him to be brought up the same as we were."

What way is that, confused?

3 posted on 09/09/2013 1:30:33 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

What, the old “one gives the egg, one carries the baby” gambit didn’t work??


4 posted on 09/09/2013 1:30:52 PM PDT by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

These two people seem unclear about one of the most basic rules of biology. With that in mind, I wonder that they are deemed fit to raise a baby.


5 posted on 09/09/2013 1:33:17 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Stop the insanity! STOP IT! STOP IT NOW!


6 posted on 09/09/2013 1:33:30 PM PDT by prisoner6 ( FREEDOM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

So why not baptize the baby? He’s an innocent who has nothing to with the issues raised by the Vicar.


7 posted on 09/09/2013 1:33:41 PM PDT by Ken H (First rule of gun safety - have a gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Cut the baby in half and baptize each half under the name of each respective mother. (unfortunately, I suspect both lesbians would support the idea....)


8 posted on 09/09/2013 1:35:11 PM PDT by Cvengr (Adversity in life and death is inevitable. Thru faith in Christ, stress is optional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Why is it, that homosexuals have temper tantrums about some aspect of society or institutions which offend them? And then, the news media comes in, and those who offended the homosexuals are reprimanded for their alleged crimes against homosexuality????

On the one hand, liberals tell us that gender roles are outmoded. We shouldn’t talk about mothers and fathers, we should talk about “parents” or “caregivers” to children.

But in this case, the lesbians insist on this retrograde designation that both be mothers. You can’t have it both ways, can you???

Where did baby Alfie come from? Did someone contribute sperm? If so, how was that sperm contributed? Is either of these females the biological mother? If so, it would seem clear that would be who should be listed as the mother. Then again, I am hopefully naive in my thinking, aren’t I???

Send me to re-education camp right now...........


9 posted on 09/09/2013 1:37:18 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trisham

In today’s world, we have to be liberal, and say that two females are just as good as a mother and a father. Otherwise, you are bigoted and hateful against the homosexual community.


10 posted on 09/09/2013 1:38:09 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Stupid beyond belief.


11 posted on 09/09/2013 1:39:50 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
"He did all this for about 10 or 15 minutes and was asking us why we want Alfie brought into the church. "I'm baptised Church of England, and Victoria is a Catholic. We want him to be brought up the same as we were."

Well now I'm sure he will be!

12 posted on 09/09/2013 1:39:54 PM PDT by Dogbert41 (Up yours NSA Obama ass lickers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Just because “The Church” says a horse is a camel doesn’t make a horse a camel.

Big Religion continues to marginalize itself.


13 posted on 09/09/2013 1:41:54 PM PDT by Arm_Bears (Refuse; Resist; Rebel; Revolt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Defies science this.

Defies biblical teaching too. Looks like the Anglican church in England has gone apostate. One can be a sinner and here is a church that will condone sinning.


14 posted on 09/09/2013 1:43:21 PM PDT by RginTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

What about the biological issue? That’s all that really means anything. Idiotic.


15 posted on 09/09/2013 1:43:42 PM PDT by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise; Chode

“”I’m baptised Church of England, and Victoria is a Catholic. We want him to be brought up the same as we were.”

What way is that, confused?”

Don’t know about the other chick, but Victoria clearly does not know her catholic catechism.


16 posted on 09/09/2013 1:46:20 PM PDT by Morgana (Always a bit of truth in dark humor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

This couple is insane, as is anyone who supports them in their insanity.


17 posted on 09/09/2013 1:48:39 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

CofE and Catholic are not the same. If she wanted to say that they wanted the baby raised CHRISTIAN, as they BOTH were that would be different.


18 posted on 09/09/2013 1:48:40 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: trisham

To such the Vicar should have made explanation to the public.

I will baptize this child as Christ commands for we do not wish any to be left outside of the Wedding Feast. Notwithstanding, the women who desire to bring up this child are clinically insane yet capable of being corrected.


19 posted on 09/09/2013 1:57:32 PM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Alterations - The acronym explains the science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

Yes, absolutely the baby should be baptized. The two women should be carted off to a quiet place in the country where they can receive help.


20 posted on 09/09/2013 2:01:16 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson