Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Evolution vs. God: Shaking the foundations of Faith
Way of the Master ministries ^ | Oct 2, 2013 | Ray Comfort

Posted on 10/17/2013 1:18:41 PM PDT by redleghunter

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: freedumb2003
Since TToE makes no such representation, it is on par with its fellow branches of science."

Science is therefor insufficient to explain the origin of matter.

21 posted on 10/17/2013 1:53:47 PM PDT by ex-snook (God is Love)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

>>So you are claiming Lamarckianism is true?<<

I made no such statement nor can one be inferred from my post(s).


22 posted on 10/17/2013 1:53:52 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Fight Tapinophobia in all its forms! Do not submit to arduus privilege.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: MrB

Ah, but it allows you to say “Well, we don’t know what the conditions on this alien planet would be. Perhaps they might make life more probable!”

There is another problem that presents itself however. Let’s say aliens did seed life on earth.
One of the problems evolution has encountered is with each successive discovery, it seems the first life has been pushed further back in time. That shortens the amount of time available for the variables to line up, decreasing the probability.
How many years would an alien species take to evolve to the level of space travel required to reach earth from the nearest possible system? Far longer than earths’ history for sure. So we’re pushing the time back further. And what if life on the alien planet was just as unlikely as here, and was in fact seeded by ANOTHER alien race? With each successive ‘seeding’ the probability would get closer and closer to bumping up against a period where no life could have existed in the universe, period.


23 posted on 10/17/2013 1:55:42 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: redleghunter

I see now this is in the Religion forum.

I shall now retire from the thread at least knowing I have informed lurkers many of us Conservatives do know and embrace science AND do not buy into invented false dichotomies of faith vs. science (there is no conflict).

Have a good day all.


24 posted on 10/17/2013 1:55:45 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Fight Tapinophobia in all its forms! Do not submit to arduus privilege.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-snook

I would fully agree with this statement. Since matter (as we known it) comes into being with the creation of the ‘natural world’, science cannot exceed its bounds to before that time. When the ‘natural world’ begins, science begins. When the ‘natural world’ ends, science ends.


25 posted on 10/17/2013 1:57:18 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: redleghunter

bfl


26 posted on 10/17/2013 2:01:22 PM PDT by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim from C-Town

Theory is the highest level of proof in science. Newton’s Laws of Motion were corrected by Einstein’s Theory of Relativity.


27 posted on 10/17/2013 2:14:21 PM PDT by muir_redwoods (Don't fire until you see the blue of their helmets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jim from C-Town

Darwin at 22 after leaving Christ’s College, Cambridge, and previously raised in a Unitarian environment, jumped upon the opportunity to join a an evangelical trip abroad on the converted brig ship, the Beagle, to return Christianized natives to Tierra Del Fuego circa 1832, personally financed by his father’s 400 pound annual allowance and labeled himself a self-financed gentleman’s companion to the 26 year old Captain.

The Christian communities at that time believed in the harmony of science and theology, but sought to explain Scripture based upon science, rather than science upon the Providence of God. Cambridge considered his findings more heretical than scientific a he definitely lacked the prior academic background to be considered a postgraduate student at the time. Many of his assertions for transmutation were within several years pointed out as improper identification of well known species and improper labeling, rather than ancient evolutionary evidence.

The consequence of begging the question, placing science before God, simply seeks to justify its premise by reasserting its premise, placing the Creation before the Creator.


28 posted on 10/17/2013 2:14:26 PM PDT by Cvengr (Adversity in life and death is inevitable. Thru faith in Christ, stress is optional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: redleghunter
We have a Sunday morning TV show called Give Me An Answer. The pastor from a Connecticut church goes to different college campuses to debate with students about God and the Bible. The pastor knows his stuff and he can explain it in simple terms. He runs circles around the die hard atheists.
29 posted on 10/17/2013 2:23:14 PM PDT by peeps36 (I'm Not A Racist, I Hate Douchebags f All Colors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
So Lamarckianism is true? Mutations create new species? There are vestigial structures? There is junk DNA?What are you implying?

Scientists may have discovered the fakes, but there were many who regarded the fakes as genuine, even after the fakery was discovered. I used to have the same kind of awe for scientists you seem to have. However, the alar scare, the global cooling and then the global warming scares, the population-bomb scare, the running out of resources scare, hocky-stick graphs, and a number of other things have showed me that scientists are often wrong and very often defend their errors with vehemence.
30 posted on 10/17/2013 2:27:50 PM PDT by attiladhun2 (The Free World has a new leader--his name is Benjamin Netanyahu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

pfl


31 posted on 10/17/2013 2:29:31 PM PDT by RedHeeler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

Someone wrote a series of statements including:

“Lamarckianism has been shown to be false”

To which you responded:

“Every single statement is scientifically incorrect”


32 posted on 10/17/2013 2:32:54 PM PDT by ifinnegan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

“If physics, geology, chemistry and astronomy are not compelled to answer the question of abiogenesis as a prerequisite, neither is TToE.”

Ok, sure. However, you do need to establish common descent as a prerequisite, which you cannot do.


33 posted on 10/17/2013 2:35:47 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

“And there is no such thing as “Darwanism.””

Have you called up Stanford and informed them of this yet? They’re still listing it in their encyclopedia of philosophy as if it was an actual thing!

http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/darwinism/


34 posted on 10/17/2013 2:38:28 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Wanderer99

God didn’t create any man as a leftist. He just gave us free will, and some of us chose to become douchebags.


35 posted on 10/17/2013 2:39:46 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Catmom
Religious people who disrespect science are every bit as annoying as scientific people who disrespect faith.

There is something true in that, within reason. "Science says we are causing our planet to heat up."

36 posted on 10/17/2013 2:41:44 PM PDT by Tenacious 1 (Waiting for next tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Wanderer99
If God specially created them then he is not good.

Well we all have our crosses to bear....Liberals are one of them.

37 posted on 10/17/2013 2:43:27 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: attiladhun2

What troubles me is how scientists who balk at evolution are treated by their peers who espouse the evolutionary line. Reminds me of close-minded liberals.


38 posted on 10/17/2013 2:51:09 PM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman
God didn’t create any man as a leftist. He just gave us free will, and some of us chose to become douchebags.

Nonsense. None of us could be as stupid as them. Not even if we tried our hardest. It's one thing to consciously choose evil out of rebellion against God. It's an entirely different thing to a mindless, soulless left-wing goon.
39 posted on 10/17/2013 3:15:25 PM PDT by Wanderer99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: attiladhun2
Indeed, it takes a very blind leap of faith to hold to Darwinism.

For a scientist...For the average Joe, not so much...Actually you don't have to know anything about it other than it's the antithesis of Christianity...

40 posted on 10/17/2013 3:20:22 PM PDT by Iscool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson