FIRST-PERSON: Can archaeology help confirm the Bible?

The Baptist Press ^ | November 4, 2013 | David Roach

[SunkenCiv]

Not one word of that obviously biased entry pertains to his historical revision; regardless, the value of wikipedia varies greatly by the entry (to say the least).

My few efforts at editing a couple of pages were short-lived — in one case, the paragraph I’d altered to correct a couple of things was reworded by someone else to state exactly the same thing, minus one of the points. The other effort was simply removed and the original text restored.

[SunkenCiv]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biblical_archaeology#Expert_Commentaries

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biblical_archaeology_school#Biblical_archaeology_today

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biblical_Minimalism

[SunkenCiv]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bible_Unearthed#Reception

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bible’s_Buried_Secrets#Reviews_and_reception

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_artifacts_significant_to_the_Bible#Controversial

[Fred Nerks]

New Evidence for Ages in Chaos

http://www.varchive.org/ce/newev.htm

[onedoug]

In some cases, yes. In others, not yet, or no.