And Paul supports the rise and continuation of alcoholics right?
1 Timothy 5:23 Drink no longer water, but use a little wine for thy stomach's sake and thine often infirmities.
Since your argument about Paul doesn't bear on the case at hand at all, then I can only assume that you acknowledge the connection between lack of procreative potential and that argument supporting homosexuality.
Do you honestly think your scripture cited supports alcoholism? It essentially says: alcohol can be used medicinally.
On the other hand, arguing for sex without potential procreativity in exhibit A can be used in support of arguing for sex without procreative potential in exhibit B.