To: marshmallow
Not very nice, not to keep a promise. But that being said, he should have tried to convince the Pope that the papers were to precious to destroy.
2 posted on
01/18/2014 2:23:49 PM PST by
Twotone
(Marte Et Clypeo)
To: marshmallow
3 posted on
01/18/2014 2:39:44 PM PST by
onyx
(Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
To: marshmallow
4 posted on
01/18/2014 2:40:52 PM PST by
onyx
(Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
To: marshmallow
His response was that the notes were of historical financial importance.
6 posted on
01/18/2014 3:00:54 PM PST by
scott7278
("...I have not changed Congress and how it operates the way I would have liked..." - BHO)
To: marshmallow
Although I believe that Pope John Paul’s notes will be edifying to many, I still think it’s wrong for Fr. Stanislaw to have kept them when he know it wasn’t what the Pope wanted. (I attribute it to an excess of affection, not any crude motive.)
Isabel Burton burned all Jane Digby’s papers, and now we will never know.
8 posted on
01/18/2014 3:15:45 PM PST by
Tax-chick
(Tell the mad chameleon he's not welcome anymore.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
