Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: PhilipFreneau

Nevertheless, the deuterocanonical books in Christ’s time ware not—and still are not—considered as having been “theopneustos — God-breathed.” They are not inspired, any more than the Encyclopaedia Brittannica or the Latin Vulgate Bible Testaments.


57 posted on 05/17/2014 5:56:32 PM PDT by imardmd1 (Fiat Lux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: imardmd1
>>>Nevertheless, the deuterocanonical books in Christ’s time ware not—and still are not—considered as having been “theopneustos — God-breathed.” They are not inspired, any more than the Encyclopaedia Brittannica or the Latin Vulgate Bible Testaments.<<<

I wonder how they made it into the King James version for a quarter of a millennium? Or, remained as part of the Bible and/or Old Testament for about 2000 years? Some claim that the only reason it was removed was to cut printing costs. Even Martin Luther believed it was profitable, and John Calvin quotes it in his commentaries.

Did you notice that, in most cases, Christ and the apostles, when quoting the old testament, quoted from the Septuagint (LXX,) which contained the Apocrypha? The LXX was supposedly composed around 250 BC by 70 Jewish Scholars, hence the nickname, LXX. An example from the new testament is this quote by Paul from Hosea; called Osee in the LXX:

As he saith also in Osee, I will call them my people, which were not my people; and her beloved, which was not beloved." (Rom 9:26 KJV)

All the gospels, plus Acts and Romans, contain quotes from Esaias (Isaiah) in the LXX.

Anyway, this is a very interesting subject.

Philip

60 posted on 05/17/2014 6:55:02 PM PDT by PhilipFreneau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson