Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Augustine’s Contribution to Supersessionism
Theological Studies ^ | Michael Vlach

Posted on 05/25/2014 6:31:35 PM PDT by wmfights

Augustine’s contribution to the doctrine of supersessionism is significant. James Carroll points out that Augustine’s attitude toward the Jews was rooted in “assumptions of supersessionism.”[i] According to Cardinal Carlo Maria Martini, Augustine (354–430) introduced a “negative element into judgment on the Jews.”[ii] He did so by advancing the “‘theory of substitution’ whereby the New Israel of the church became a substitute of ancientIsrael.”[iii]

In line with supersessionist theology, Augustine explicitly stated that the title “Israel” belonged to the Christian church: “For if we hold with a firm heart the grace of God which hath been given us, we are Israel, the seed of Abraham. . . . Let therefore no Christian consider himself alien to the name of Israel.”[iv] He also said, “The Christian people then is rather Israel.”[v] According to Augustine, when Gentiles believe and become part of the new covenant, their hearts are circumcised and they become part of Israel:

Now what the apostle attributed to Gentiles of this character, how that “they have the work of the law written in their hearts;” must be some such thing as what he says to the Corinthians: “Not in tables of stone, but in fleshly tables of the heart.” For thus do they become of the house of Israel, when their uncircumcision is accounted circumcision. . . . And therefore in the house of the true Israel, in which is no guile, they are partakers of the new testament.[vi]

Concerning Israel’s role in the plan of God, Augustine argued that national Israel prefiguredspiritual Israel—the Christian people:

Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob three fathers, and one people. The fathers three, as it were in the beginning of the people; three fathers in whom the people was figured: and the former people itself the present people. For in the Jewish people was figured the Christian people. There a figure, here the truth; there a shadow, here the body: as the apostle says, “Now these things happened to them in a figure.”[vii]

For the most part, Augustine’s supersessionist views were not original. In fact, they were mostly consistent with the patristic tradition that preceded him. Augustine’s most original contribution regarding Israel and the church, however, can be found in his reasons for Israel’s continued existence. During Augustine’s time, the existence of the Jews and Judaism posed an apologetic problem for the church. If the church was the new Israel, for what purpose did national Israel exist?

Augustine offered an answer for this perceived dilemma. For him, the Jews functioned primarily as witnesses. They were witnesses to the faith preached by the prophets, witnesses of divine judgment, and witnesses of the validity of Christianity. He wrote, “But the Jews who slew Him . . . are thus by their own Scriptures a testimony to us that we have not forged the prophecies about Christ.”[viii] The Jews, according to Augustine, shielded Christians from accusations that Christians invented Old Testament prophecies that pointed to Jesus. Thus, the existence of non-Christian Jews was not a problem but an essential testimony to the truth of Christianity.

Hood views Augustine’s contribution in this area as “ingenious” because it “provided a foundation for tolerating Jews within a Christian society.”[ix] Augustine’s contention that the Jews were witnesses to Christianity became especially important when the crusades began and the church began to persecute heretics. Hood asserts that Augustine’s views “shielded the Jews of western Europe from the full force of Christendom’s coercive powers.”[x]

Although devoting much of his attention to matters such as free will, original sin, and predestination, Augustine’s views on the Jews and Judaism carried great weight for many years. In fact, Hood asserts that Augustine’s ideas on these matters “dominated the medieval debate.”[xi] This was so “despite the fact that Judaism and the Jews are not major themes in Augustine’s voluminous writings.”[xii] Yet, because Augustine’s writings in the Medieval Era were so revered, his thoughts on any topic, no matter how sparse, were considered important.

[i] James Carroll, Constantine’s Sword: The Church and the Jews (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2001), 219.

[ii] Cardinal Carlo Maria Martini, “Christianity and Judaism, a Historical and Theological Overview,” in Jews and Christians: Exploring the Past, Present, and Future, ed. James H. Charlesworth (New York: Crossroad, 1990), 20.

[iii] Ibid.

[iv] Augustine, On the Psalms 114.3, NPNF¹ 8:550.

[v] Augustine, On the Psalms 114.3, NPNF¹ 8:550.

[vi] Augustine, On the Spirit and the Letter 46, NPNF¹ 5:102–03.

[vii] Augustine, On the Gospel of St. John 11.8, NPNF¹ 7:77. Augustine also stated, “In that people [the Jews], plainly, the future Church was much more evidently prefigured.” Augustine, On the Catechising of the Uninstructed 19.33, NPNF¹ 3:304. Augustine expressed a supersessionist perspective when he wrote, “But when they [the Jews] killed Him, then though they knew it not, they prepared a Supper for us.” Augustine,Sermons on New Testament Lessons, Sermon 62, NPNF¹ 6:447.

[viii] Augustine, The City of God Book 18.46, NPNF¹ 2:389.

[ix] John Y. B. Hood, Aquinas and the Jews (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1995), 12. Carroll states, “It is not too much to say that, at this juncture, Christianity ‘permitted’ Judaism to endure because of Augustine.” Carroll, Constantine’s Sword, 218. See also Jeremy Cohen, “Introduction,” inEssential Papers on Judaism and Christianity in Conflict: From Late Antiquity to the Reformation, ed. Jeremy Cohen (New York: New York University Press, 1991), 13–14.

[x] Hood, 13.

[xi] Hood, Aquinas and the Jews, 10.

[xii] Ibid.


TOPICS: Charismatic Christian; Evangelical Christian; Theology
KEYWORDS: dispensationalism; supersessionism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last
Augustine’s contention that the Jews were witnesses to Christianity became especially important when the crusades began and the church began to persecute heretics. Hood asserts that Augustine’s views “shielded the Jews of western Europe from the full force of Christendom’s coercive powers.”[x]
1 posted on 05/25/2014 6:31:35 PM PDT by wmfights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: wmfights

2 posted on 05/25/2014 6:34:05 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wmfights; Kandy Atz; Mrs.Z; CynicalBear; Iscool; amigatec; kjam22; boatbums; imardmd1; metmom
Dispensational Caucus ping

While Augustine's view of supersessionism may have blunted some of the persecution Jews suffered, the underlying belief that Jerusalem should be under Christian control has not changed.

3 posted on 05/25/2014 6:36:25 PM PDT by wmfights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wmfights
we are Israel, the seed of Abraham. . . . Let therefore no Christian consider himself alien to the name of Israel.”

Who is the "true circumcision"?

Have you read through the root post from the recent thread The Church and Israel in the New Testament?

4 posted on 05/25/2014 7:26:40 PM PDT by Lee N. Field ("And if you are Christ's, then you are Abraham's offspring, heirs according to promise" Gal 3:29)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wmfights; Lee N. Field

wmfights, you would do well to read lee’s tag line.

Augustine was completely faithful to the Word of God.


5 posted on 05/25/2014 8:10:28 PM PDT by one Lord one faith one baptism
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wmfights

I just looked up Supersessionism — Replacement Theology???

I don’t think St. Augustine would have had anything to do with this idea.

Sounds heretical to me.


6 posted on 05/25/2014 8:28:12 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wmfights

I’m not sure about these terms of “Replacement theology” and the like, but it seems hard to argue that we aren’t spiritual Israel and the children of Abraham, as that is what we are taught explicitly in the scripture. The Jews, who I do not reckon as to be cast aside, nevertheless are not saved so long as they remain in denial of Christ.

I have heard people claim that the Jews are saved, and need not be preached to at all.


7 posted on 05/25/2014 9:47:27 PM PDT by Greetings_Puny_Humans (I mostly come out at night... mostly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wmfights; Lee N. Field; one Lord one faith one baptism
One would think something as touted as "Dual Covenant Theology" (DCT) would have at least one clear reference in the New Testament. To the contrary, the book of the Hebrews seems to indicate the new covenant replaces the old covenant:

    "In that he saith, A new covenant, he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away." (Heb 8:13 KJV)

Note that the old covenant was "ready to vanish away" about 2000 years ago. And we know from the words of Hebrews 9:15-20 that the new covenant is just another name for the new testament.

To render DCT even less credible, all touted old testament (OT) references are far from convincing. For example, a common OT reference claimed to support DCT is Deuteronomy 30:1-6. The problem with that passage, for Israel, is highlighted:

    "And it shall come to pass, when all these things are come upon thee, the blessing and the curse, which I have set before thee, and thou shalt call them to mind among all the nations, whither the Lord thy God hath driven thee, And shalt return unto the Lord thy God, and shalt obey his voice according to all that I command thee this day, thou and thy children, with all thine heart, and with all thy soul; That then the Lord thy God will turn thy captivity, and have compassion upon thee, and will return and gather thee from all the nations, whither the Lord thy God hath scattered thee. If any of thine be driven out unto the outmost parts of heaven, from thence will the Lord thy God gather thee, and from thence will he fetch thee: And the Lord thy God will bring thee into the land which thy fathers possessed, and thou shalt possess it; and he will do thee good, and multiply thee above thy fathers. And the Lord thy God will circumcise thine heart, and the heart of thy seed, to love the Lord thy God with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, that thou mayest live." (Deu 30:1-6 KJV)

This passage was fulfilled after the Babylonian Captivity; but Israel did not remain faithful, nor did it seem that God expected them to. There was this dire warning later in the chapter:

    "See, I have set before thee this day life and good, and death and evil; In that I command thee this day to love the Lord thy God, to walk in his ways, and to keep his commandments and his statutes and his judgments, that thou mayest live and multiply: and the Lord thy God shall bless thee in the land whither thou goest to possess it. But if thine heart turn away, so that thou wilt not hear, but shalt be drawn away, and worship other gods, and serve them; I denounce unto you this day, that ye shall surely perish, and that ye shall not prolong your days upon the land, whither thou passest over Jordan to go to possess it. I call heaven and earth to record this day against you, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing: therefore choose life, that both thou and thy seed may live: That thou mayest love the Lord thy God, and that thou mayest obey his voice, and that thou mayest cleave unto him: for he is thy life, and the length of thy days: that thou mayest dwell in the land which the Lord sware unto thy fathers, to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob, to give them." (Deu 30:15-20 KJV)

In the next chapter, Moses gave the most dire warning of all:

    "For I know thy rebellion, and thy stiff neck: behold, while I am yet alive with you this day, ye have been rebellious against the Lord; and how much more after my death? Gather unto me all the elders of your tribes, and your officers, that I may speak these words in their ears, and call heaven and earth to record against them. For I know that after my death ye will utterly corrupt yourselves, and turn aside from the way which I have commanded you; and evil will befall you in the latter days; because ye will do evil in the sight of the Lord, to provoke him to anger through the work of your hands." (Deu 31:27-29 KJV)

So, instead of enjoying the blessings of Jesus Christ and his kingdom, they were cursed: all but a faithful remnant, and maybe a few others.

The next chapter (ch. 32) contains the Song of Moses, mentioned in Revelation 15:3. It is also unfavorable for Israel:

    "They have corrupted themselves, their spot is not the spot of his children: they are a perverse and crooked generation." (Deu 32:5 KJV)

This is the conclusion to the Song of Moses:

    "For I lift up my hand to heaven, and say, I live for ever. If I whet my glittering sword, and mine hand take hold on judgment; I will render vengeance to mine enemies, and will reward them that hate me. I will make mine arrows drunk with blood, and my sword shall devour flesh; and that with the blood of the slain and of the captives, from the beginning of revenges upon the enemy. Rejoice, O ye nations, with his people: for he will avenge the blood of his servants, and will render vengeance to his adversaries, and will be merciful unto his land, and to his people." (Deu 32:40-43 KJV)

In the last verse, you can see why those in the Revelation were singing the Song of Moses: their blood was avenged by the destruction of Jerusalem (which was also the fulfillment of Deuteronomy 28.)

And who are his people? St Augustine explains in "A Treatise on the Spirit and the Letter:"

    40. . . “They shall all know me,”[Jer. xxxi. 34] He says,—“All,” the house of Israel and house of Judah. “All,” however, “are not Israel which are of Israel,”[Rom. ix. 6] but they only to whom it is said in “the psalm concerning the morning aid”[See title of Ps. xxii] (that is, concerning the new refreshing light, meaning that of the new testament), “All ye the seed of Jacob, glorify Him; and fear Him, all ye the seed of Israel.”[Ps. xxii. 23] All the seed, without exception, even the entire seed of the promise and of the called, but only of those who are the called according to His purpose.[Rom. viii. 28] “For whom He did predestinate, them He also called; and whom He called, them He also justified; and whom He justified, them He also glorified.”[Rom. viii. 30] “Therefore it is of faith, that it might be by grace; to the end the promise might be sure to all the seed: not to that only which is of the law,”—that is, which comes from the Old Testament into the New,—“but to that also which is of faith,” which was indeed prior to the law, even “the faith of Abraham,”—meaning those who imitate the faith of Abraham,—“who is the father of us all; as it is written, I have made thee the father of many nations.”[Rom. iv. 16, 17] Now all these predestinated, called, justified, glorified ones, shall know God by the grace of the new testament, from the least to the greatest of them.

    51. . . By faith, therefore, in Jesus Christ we obtain salvation,—both in so far as it is begun within us in reality, and in so far as its perfection is waited for in hope; “for whosoever shall call on the name of the Lord shall be saved.” [Rom. x. 13; Joel ii. 32]

This is the Joel reference:

    "And it shall come to pass, that whosoever shall call on the name of the Lord shall be delivered: for in mount Zion and in Jerusalem shall be deliverance, as the Lord hath said, and in the remnant whom the Lord shall call." (Joel 2:32 KJV)

Note that Joel includes both paths to salvation that Augustine mentioned: 1) being called by the Lord; and 2) calling upon the name of the Lord. Those are the only paths to salvation: the only way anyone will become one of "His People."

Philip

8 posted on 05/25/2014 10:16:42 PM PDT by PhilipFreneau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
Pope Pius XII, in the encyclical Mystici corporis (1943) states: By the death of our Redeemer, the New Testament took the place of the Old Law which had been abolished; then the Law of Christ together with its mysteries, enactments, institutions, and sacred rites was ratified for the whole world in the blood of Jesus Christ. For, while our Divine Savior was preaching in a restricted area - He was not sent but to the sheep that were lost of the House of Israel - the Law and the Gospel were together in force; but on the gibbet of His death Jesus made void the Law with its decrees fastened the handwriting of the Old Testament to the Cross, establishing the New Testament in His blood shed for the whole human race. “To such an extent, then,” says St. Leo the Great, speaking of the Cross of our Lord, “was there effected a transfer from the Law to the Gospel, from the Synagogue to the Church, from the many sacrifices to one Victim, that, as Our Lord expired, that mystical veil which shut off the innermost part of the temple and its sacred secret was rent violently from top to bottom.” (paragraph 29)

Doesn't sound heretical to me at all. It sounds like solid Traditional Catholicism.

9 posted on 05/26/2014 6:31:39 AM PDT by piusv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Greetings_Puny_Humans

>>>I have heard people claim that the Jews are saved, and need not be preached to at all.<<<

This link has some information:

“John Hagee on Salvation for the Jews”

http://www.apologeticsindex.org/357-john-hagee-salvation

Philip


10 posted on 05/26/2014 6:36:00 AM PDT by PhilipFreneau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: piusv

Then I must be mis-understanding it.

What I got is that they disown the Old Testament and only go by the New Testament. Is that correct?

I understand that the New Testament is the fulfillment of the Old Testament, but I’ve never heard of it totally replacing the Old Testament.


11 posted on 05/26/2014 6:36:37 AM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

I think the key is in the Pope’s comments in my earlier post. Upon Christ’s death things changed from fulfillment to replacement.


12 posted on 05/26/2014 6:52:13 AM PDT by piusv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: piusv
>>>…while our Divine Savior was preaching in a restricted area - He was not sent but to the sheep that were lost of the House of Israel<<<

That is an underemphasized fact that needs more exposure. This is Jesus:

    "But [Jesus] answered and said, I am NOT sent BUT unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel." (Mt 15:24 KJV)

    "These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel. And as ye go, preach, saying, The kingdom of heaven is at hand. Heal the sick, cleanse the lepers, raise the dead, cast out devils: freely ye have received, freely give." (Mt 10:5-8 KJV)

Christ was on a mission to bring many of the lost sheep into the fold before the destruction of Jerusalem and other Israeli cities that would occur forty years later:

    "And ye shall be hated of all men for my name's sake: but he that endureth to the end shall be saved. But when they persecute you in this city, flee ye into another: for verily I say unto you, Ye shall not have gone over the cities of Israel, till the Son of man be come." (Mt 10:22-23 KJV)

    "I am the good shepherd, and know my sheep, and am known of mine. As the Father knoweth me, even so know I the Father: and I lay down my life for the sheep. And other sheep I have, which are not of this fold: them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice; and there shall be one fold, and one shepherd." (Jn 10:14-16 KJV)

Some believe that was the fulfillment of this prophesy by Ezekiel:

    "For thus saith the Lord God; Behold, I, even I, will both search my sheep, and seek them out. As a shepherd seeketh out his flock in the day that he is among his sheep that are scattered; so will I seek out my sheep, and will deliver them out of all places where they have been scattered in the cloudy and dark day." (Eze 34:11-12 KJV)

    "Therefore will I save my flock, and they shall no more be a prey; and I will judge between cattle and cattle. And I will set up one shepherd over them, and he shall feed them, even my servant David; he shall feed them, and he shall be their shepherd. And I the Lord will be their God, and my servant David a prince among them; I the Lord have spoken it." (Eze 34:22-24 KJV)

And this one by Zechariah:

    "The Lord also shall save the tents of Judah first, that the glory of the house of David and the glory of the inhabitants of Jerusalem do not magnify themselves against Judah." (Zec 12:7-8 KJV)

Why would God save the tents of Judah, first? Because that was the "umbrella," if you will, for the children of Israel, to whom Christ was directly sent. Later, when the tents of David were raised (Acts 15:14-17, which was the fulfillment of Amos 9:11-12,) Gentiles were allowed into the fold, of which Cornelius was the first (note: David's tabernacle was a tent):

    "Simeon hath declared how God at the first did visit the Gentiles, to take out of them a people for his name. And to this agree the words of the prophets; as it is written, After this I will return, and will build again the tabernacle of David, which is fallen down; and I will build again the ruins thereof, and I will set it up: That the residue of men might seek after the Lord, and all the Gentiles, upon whom my name is called, saith the Lord, who doeth all these things." (Acts 15:14-17; Amos 9:11-12 KJV)

Philip

13 posted on 05/26/2014 7:13:52 AM PDT by PhilipFreneau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Greetings_Puny_Humans; wmfights
I’m not sure about these terms of “Replacement theology” and the like, but it seems hard to argue that we aren’t spiritual Israel and the children of Abraham, as that is what we are taught explicitly in the scripture. The Jews, who I do not reckon as to be cast aside, nevertheless are not saved so long as they remain in denial of Christ.

Absolutely. Outside of Christ, they are lost. In Christ, the dividing wall is broken down. Believing Gentiles are in.

We look forward to the day when the "partial hardening" Paul talks about is taken away, and the Jews are converted to Christ.

If that's "supersessionism", then the argument is with Paul.

14 posted on 05/26/2014 7:39:18 AM PDT by Lee N. Field ("And if you are Christ's, then you are Abraham's offspring, heirs according to promise" Gal 3:29)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Salvation; Kandy Atz; Mrs.Z; CynicalBear; Iscool; amigatec; kjam22; boatbums; imardmd1; metmom
I just looked up Supersessionism — Replacement Theology???

I don’t think St. Augustine would have had anything to do

with this idea. Sounds heretical to me.

Dispensational Ping

This is a great example of why it's so good to go into detail about theological beliefs. My experience witnessing to RC's is they don't know what their church believes. I think you will find that most RC's have no idea that their church believes it should be in control of Jerusalem, or what their eschatological views are.

I believe this eschatological view, of which supersessionism is a part, helps to explain why the RCC has an affinity for islam.

15 posted on 05/26/2014 8:04:53 AM PDT by wmfights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Greetings_Puny_Humans
I have heard people claim that the Jews are saved, and need not be preached to at all.

That would be the extreme end of the other end of the spectrum. I don't believe you will find many Evangelical Christians that hold to the belief that there is any other way to be saved other than through Faith Alone in Christ Alone during this Church Age.

16 posted on 05/26/2014 8:07:59 AM PDT by wmfights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wmfights

>>>I believe this eschatological view, of which supersessionism is a part, helps to explain why the RCC has an affinity for islam.<<<

That is quite a stretch. What’s next, the anti-semite label?

Philip


17 posted on 05/26/2014 8:08:48 AM PDT by PhilipFreneau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: wmfights
Could you explain this more?

I believe this eschatological view, of which supersessionism is a part, helps to explain why the RCC has an affinity for islam.

18 posted on 05/26/2014 8:59:56 AM PDT by piusv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
>>>I just looked up SupersessionismReplacement Theology??? I don’t think St. Augustine would have had anything to do with this idea. Sounds heretical to me.<<<

Don't let the dispensationalists trick you. Those are new-age aspersions created solely to slander those who believe in legitimate, new covenant doctrine, such as:

1) the new covenant replaced the old covenant:

    "In that he saith, A new covenant, he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away." (Heb 8:13 KJV)

2) the Church replaced Israel as God's chosen people:

    "For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus. For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ. There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus. And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise." (Gal 3:26-29 KJV)

    "And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth . . ." (Acts 17:26 KJV)

3) Christ rejected an earthly reign:

    "Again, the devil taketh him up into an exceeding high mountain, and sheweth him all the kingdoms of the world, and the glory of them; And saith unto him, All these things will I give thee, if thou wilt fall down and worship me. Then saith Jesus unto him, Get thee hence, Satan: for it is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and him only shalt thou serve." (Mt 4:8-10 KJV)

    "Ye [scribes and Pharisees] are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it." (Jn 8:44 KJV)

    "Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world …" (Jn 18:36 KJV)

4) Christ came to create the church, not to rule over the Jews:

    "Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it;" (Eph 5:25 KJV)

5) The Church is permanent:

    "Unto him be glory in the church by Christ Jesus throughout all ages, world without end. Amen." (Eph 3:21 KJV)

Philip

19 posted on 05/26/2014 11:28:18 AM PDT by PhilipFreneau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PhilipFreneau
>>>I just looked up Supersessionism — Replacement Theology??? I don’t think St. Augustine would have had anything to do with this idea. Sounds heretical to me.<<<

Don't let the dispensationalists trick you.

The irony is dripping here ...

1) the new covenant replaced the old covenant:
5) The Church is permanent:

2 out of 5 ... If you were a baseball player, you'd be an all-star ... but ...

20 posted on 05/26/2014 2:58:29 PM PDT by dartuser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson