Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romeward Bound: Evaluating Why Protestants Convert to Catholicism
Center for Reformed Theology and Apologetics ^ | 05/31/14 | David Hagopian

Posted on 05/31/2014 3:30:55 PM PDT by boatbums

The Wizard of Oz has fascinated adults and children for many years. You know the story: a farm girl from Kansas finds herself in the middle of an unwelcomed adventure in an attempt to find the fanciful wizard, who, she hopes, will help her return home. After many trials and tribulations, she, along with her newfound friends, ultimately arrives at the Emerald City only to discover, much to her chagrin, that the "wizard" was really no wizard at all. He wasn't much of anything. In modern parlance, he was a wimp.

Believe it or not, many-a-Protestant claims to have experienced a disenchantment similar to that of Dorothy. And like the disenchanted Dorothy who just wanted to go home, so too these disenchanted Protestants want to go home. The home these Protestants long for, however, is not the home they left behind. These Protestants are Romeward bound.

True, the number of Protestant converts to Catholicism is less than the other way around. And there are less actual converts to Rome today than during previous points in the history of Catholicism. Nevertheless, there is something unique about this modern conversion phenomenon, since "the kind of converts appears to be quite different, with fewer obligatory conversions for such reasons as marriage. A significant number of Protestant evangelicals...are among those moving to Rome...."

Many evangelical Protestants are converting to "Roman obedience." Or, in the words of one such convert, they are "getting churched" or "poping." Jocularity aside, it is important for Protestants to come to grips with the reasons why these Neocatholics have set their compasses toward Rome, only then will Protestants be able to see some of the shortcomings of their espoused faith. Only then will they be able to meet the needs of those who are "taking the plunge."

(Excerpt) Read more at reformed.org ...


TOPICS: Apologetics; General Discusssion; Religion & Culture; Theology
KEYWORDS: catholic; catholicism; conversion; neocatholicism; romanism; romesweethome; swimmingthetiber
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-136 next last
To: Brian Kopp DPM

“That ain’t ‘conversion,’ its convenience.”

It’s adultery - just like Protestantism itself.


41 posted on 05/31/2014 4:45:22 PM PDT by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998

Vlad, you’re a good case in point. Condemning all divorces and remarriages is just as mindless and unbiblical as the other extreme of condoning them all.


42 posted on 05/31/2014 4:48:30 PM PDT by Genoa (Starve the beast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998

“Same old, same old (2002): http://www.etsjets.org/files/JETS-PDFs/45/45-3/45-3-PP451-472_JETS.pdf";

My greatgrandfather was contemporary, ans well as a close friend of John Nelson Darby. Darby was a friend of Cardinal Newman. They had various discourse exchanges.

Darby also had a personal ministry to Queen Victoria. Darby was 20 years senior to my great grandfather. When Darby could no longer continue that ministry, it fell on my greatgrandfather to do so. He did so until her death.


43 posted on 05/31/2014 4:48:37 PM PDT by GGpaX4DumpedTea (I am a Tea Party descendant...steeped in the Constitutional Republic given to us by the Founders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998

A couple of things, in my experience Catholic converts can surely tell you why they converted and the stories don’t lend themselves to one-liners. It is usually a journey that took years.

The fact that most of them were enthusiastic, committed Protestants was surely a wonderful part of the journey.

Since I have become Catholic I know several people who have left the church and without fail they quit because they never heard the Bible in the Catholic Church and I just shake my head. We know that almost every word that is spoken comes directly from the Bible or we are doing what we told to do in the Bible.


44 posted on 05/31/2014 4:49:57 PM PDT by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Genoa

It’s not the only one. But in 2014 America it’s definitely the most common one. The local mega church admits it and laughs about it. I went to Haiti with them so I heard it first hand.


45 posted on 05/31/2014 4:52:49 PM PDT by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Brian Kopp DPM

As I indicated, the only proper response is to assess cases biblically. Rome is just as much at fault on this issue as your local megachurch, only for the opposite reason.


46 posted on 05/31/2014 4:55:32 PM PDT by Genoa (Starve the beast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Genoa

“Vlad, you’re a good case in point. Condemning all divorces and remarriages is just as mindless and unbiblical as the other extreme of condoning them all.”

1) I CLEARLY am not a case in point for any case you’re making.

2) I NEVER condemned ALL “divorces and remarriages”.

Your post is a “case in point” of how Protestants make things up out of thin air.


47 posted on 05/31/2014 4:56:35 PM PDT by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: ALPAPilot
"Is it being saved by Grace that is the gift of God, or is it faith that is the gift of God?"

Great question! According to the quoted passage, faith is the gift. Salvation is also a gift, but faith must come first - as the only pathway to salvation. Faith is not a natural part of our fallen nature, so it must be "gifted" to us by God - for there is no good thing within us...

48 posted on 05/31/2014 4:58:25 PM PDT by uncommonsense (Liberals see what they believe; Conservatives believe what they see.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: chajin

Because the Catholic Church is older?


49 posted on 05/31/2014 4:58:47 PM PDT by Technical Editor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998
I believe you were equating divorce and remarriage with adultery ipso facto. Or you weren't communicating very effectively.
50 posted on 05/31/2014 4:59:02 PM PDT by Genoa (Starve the beast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: GGpaX4DumpedTea

“My greatgrandfather was contemporary, ans well as a close friend of John Nelson Darby....it fell on my greatgrandfather to do so. He did so until her death.”

Well, then your greatgrandfather knew someone pretty famous.


51 posted on 05/31/2014 5:03:15 PM PDT by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Genoa

“I believe you were equating divorce and remarriage with adultery ipso facto.”

Jesus equates divorce and remarriage with adultery. Take it up with Him.

“Or you weren’t communicating very effectively.”

Jesus communicated very effectively on the issue:

“Whoever divorces his wife and marries another, commits adultery against her; and if she divorces her husband and marries another, she commits adultery.”


52 posted on 05/31/2014 5:07:09 PM PDT by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Genoa

LOL! Rome is the only Church maintaining the Biblical standard on divorce and remarriage. The rest have caved, accommodated themselves to the world.


53 posted on 05/31/2014 5:09:00 PM PDT by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998
Oh come on, you conveniently fail to notice Matthew 5:32, the parallel passage in which porneia is stated as an exception. Also see 1 Corinthians 7:15, concerning desertion of the marriage.
54 posted on 05/31/2014 5:10:29 PM PDT by Genoa (Starve the beast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Genoa; vladimir998

And I might add that it is disingenuous to deny condemning all divorce and remarriage, and then effectively do just that in your next post!


55 posted on 05/31/2014 5:14:43 PM PDT by Genoa (Starve the beast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Genoa

Gotta go, maybe another Protestant will take up.


56 posted on 05/31/2014 5:18:54 PM PDT by Genoa (Starve the beast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: ALPAPilot; boatbums; uncommonsense

Its an interesting question. The best analyses I’ve seen suggest it is the whole chain, (grace & faith resulting in salvation) = gift of God. This is based on the gender matching issues in the terms. Paul apparently used this technique as a kind of summation device.


57 posted on 05/31/2014 5:28:56 PM PDT by Springfield Reformer (Winston Churchill: No Peace Till Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Brian Kopp DPM

Not true. I fellowshipped with some Baptist groups that were unrelenting in their total rejection of divorce, remarriage, etc. It is from them I first learned how to refute even the adultery exception (entirely from Scripture BTW). It’s generally unwise to make sweeping generalizations without a truly general knowledge of all the facts, generally speaking. :)


58 posted on 05/31/2014 5:35:02 PM PDT by Springfield Reformer (Winston Churchill: No Peace Till Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Brian Kopp DPM

I think the Amish and maybe the old order Mennonites don’t accept civil divorce and remarriage either. Also no birth control within marriage, to my understanding.

Freegards


59 posted on 05/31/2014 5:54:31 PM PDT by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Genoa

Your post is an example of why I believe modern adherence to Protestantism is at least in part to poor reading comprehension on the part of Protestants.

You wrote:

“And I might add that it is disingenuous to deny condemning all divorce and remarriage, and then effectively do just that in your next post!”

1) Jesus - remember Him? - condemned divorce and remarriage. Does He give any qualifiers?

2) What I did was condemn divorce and remarriage - just like Jesus.

3) Having said that, I think it is possible for a person to divorce and remarry and NOT commit adultery - but only when that first marriage was no marriage at all. Hence, for example, the Pauline privilege (1 Corinthians 7).

“Oh come on, you conveniently fail to notice Matthew 5:32, the parallel passage in which porneia is stated as an exception.”

I failed in no way. Divorce is NOT divorce AND REMARRIAGE. Those are two separate things. An exception to “no divorce” is not a support for “divorce and remarriage”.

“Also see 1 Corinthians 7:15, concerning desertion of the marriage.”

Already know the text, thanks.

“And I might add that it is disingenuous to deny condemning all divorce and remarriage, and then effectively do just that in your next post!”

Wrong again. JESUS - again, remember HIM? - JESUS condemns divorce AND REMARRIAGE. I never condemned ALL divorce and remarriage, but I know that must mean there was no real marriage to begin with. The vast majority of Catholics who defect from the Church to Protestant sects because of divorce AND REMARRIAGE are, however, committing adultery. And Protestantism itself is like adultery in its founding. Anglicanism was founded on it in the most direct way.

Jesus CONDEMNS divorce and REMARRIAGE. Go to the Lord with your complaint against His holy Word.


60 posted on 05/31/2014 6:06:41 PM PDT by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-136 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson