In short, the higher clergy have not been doing a good job in areas where we expect them to have expertise and know what they are talking about. With this type of appalling track record since Vatican II, why should we have an ounce of trust when they decide to pronounce in areas, like climatology, where they clearly have no expertise? Clerics today seem to be indifferent to the fact that they are not doing the jobs they are paid to do, and eagerly climb on political bandwagons, usually leftist in nature, perhaps to attempt to conceal the fact that they are incompetent or worse when it comes to doing the tasks they have sworn to dedicate their lives to performing.
1 posted on
06/12/2015 7:25:09 PM PDT by
ebb tide
To: ebb tide
I just want to know when the guy who says the earth can only handle less than a billion people is going to off himself.
2 posted on
06/12/2015 7:30:10 PM PDT by
dp0622
To: ebb tide
Confess your sins to Gaia. Or maybe Cardinal Gore.
3 posted on
06/12/2015 7:57:12 PM PDT by
beethovenfan
(Islam is a cancer on civilization.)
To: ebb tide
History repeats. The Pope is, again, a man to be feared.
5 posted on
06/12/2015 8:34:06 PM PDT by
Misterioso
(Islam is un-American.)
To: ebb tide
6 posted on
06/12/2015 9:00:09 PM PDT by
Jeff Chandler
(So is carbon dioxide the "Smoke of Satan"?)
To: ebb tide
The Pope has filled various Vatican posts with pro-abortion bishops, priests, and laypeople. They have been attacking pro-lifers—using pro-abortion clichés.
The very kindest interpretation of the Pope’s choice of so many pro-aborts, and his choice of this Nazi wacko, is that the Pope is senile.
To: ebb tide
This pope’s main goal is taking money from those who earn it and sending it to lazy low-IQ countries. This encyclical will be about that.
10 posted on
06/13/2015 4:21:31 AM PDT by
I want the USA back
(Media: completely irresponsible. Complicit in the destruction of this country.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson