“Jello time again I see.”
Nope. Think about what’s happening here: someone claimed I said something I never said. I was accused of saying the Eucharist was not a sacrifice. I never said that and anyone - ANYONE AT ALL - can see in Post #339 that all I did was correct his error about believing Catholics sacrifice Jesus over and over again. Remember, the following paragraph is the one he falsely claims I said the Eucharist is not a sacrifice:
“What’s false is clearly your understanding if you think anyone could sacrifice Jesus over and over again. No one could and no one wants to either. So which is it that you are getting wrong there? Are you wrong about someone being able to sacrifice Jesus over and over again or are you wrong on believing Catholics sacrifice Jesus over and over again? It has to be one or the other OR BOTH according to your own words. The correct answer is - BOTH - since both are impossible.”
I never once in that paragraph denied the Eucharist is a sacrifice. I did deny that Jesus could be sacrificed over and over. He can’t. But His sacrifice can be re-presented and that’s exactly how the CCC 1366 says the Eucharist IS a sacrifice.
Catholicism is very Climtonian in a lot of ways with there terminology.