Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar

“L.L. Brown printing says the Apocrypha was not in theirs, but it WAS!”

It is funny that the Apocrypha was in each and every bible prior to when your “reformers” got their paws on it.i

They “reformed” it so much you can’t even see it anymore.

By george that should be the definition of “reformers”: “As those who made authentic scripture disappear”

AMDG


16 posted on 04/25/2016 8:08:48 PM PDT by LurkingSince'98 (Ad Majoram Dei Gloriam = FOR THE GREATER GLORY OF GOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: LurkingSince'98

Actually the REFORMERS did not remove it as it is in my repro copy of the 1611 KJV from Nelson and Geneva. It is not in my photocopy of the KJV Old English version but it originally was. You can get a list of the translators who translated the Apocrypha for the original KJV.

I also saw a new KJV printed in England with the Apocrypha in it from Cambridge Printers no less.

If it is not in the USA versions you can still order it in a separate book.
I have read it several times and believe EVERYONE should read the Apocrypha to see just why it is not included in most modern printings of the Bible.


19 posted on 04/25/2016 8:41:33 PM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: LurkingSince'98

I should add that when Jerome translated the Vulgate he wanted to remove the Apocrypha was ordered to keep it in.


20 posted on 04/25/2016 8:43:05 PM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson