Posted on 08/26/2016 5:42:35 PM PDT by ebb tide
Yesterdays top CWN headline story, about problems with the sex-education guide issued by the Pontifical Council for the Family, sheds more lightor perhaps I should say, casts a darker shadowon a story that appeared earlier this month, about new appointments to the Roman Curia.
The problematical sex-ed program was prepared by the Pontifical Council for the Family, headed by Archbishop Vincenzo Paglia. On August 14, the Vatican announced that Pope Francis had named Archbishop Paglia to become president of the Pontifical Academy for Life and chancellor of the Pontifical John Paul II Institute for Studies on Marriage and Family. In the past, those two Vatican officesthe Pontifical Academy for Life and the John Paul II Institutehave been bulwarks of support for the pro-life/pro-family movement. The dual appointment for Archbishop Paglia seems clearly to signal a change.
The release of the sex-ed program was not the first time that Archbishop Paglia has raised the hackles of more conservative Catholics. Last year he organized a series of seminars, leading up to the Synod on the Family, with a list of speakers heavily tilted toward the Kasper proposal for allowing divorced-and-remarried Catholics to receive Communion.
In naming Archbishop Paglia to his new post, Pope Francis also gave him some public instructions, encouraging him to focus on the new challenges concerning the value of life. The Pope elaborated:
I refer to the various aspects concerning the care of the dignity of the human person in the various ages of existence, mutual respect between genders and generations, the defense of the dignity of every single human being, the promotion of quality of human life that integrates the material and spiritual values, in view of an authentic human ecology, which helps to restore the original balance of creation between the human person and the whole universe. Conspicuously missing from the Holy Fathers list of concerns were the sort of clear-cut statements on abortion and euthanasia, divorce and contraception, that Catholics came to expect during the pontificate of St. John Paul II. And remember that Archbishop Paglia will also be serving as chancellor of the scholarly institute named for the saintly Pontiff. There, too, changes are in store.
Msgr. Livio Melina, who has earned international respect as the president of the John Paul II Instituteand as an energetic defender of the teachings put forward by St. John Paul II on marriage and family lifeis being replaced. (Msgr. Melina was forthright in his defense of the Churchs traditional teaching that divorced-and-remarried Catholics cannot receive the Eucharist, and that recent papal statements do not change that doctrinal stand.) The new president is Msgr. Pierangelo Sequeri, who was described in the Vatican announcement as a theologian, but is better known as the composer of a popular Italian hymn.
Neither these new leaders nor the Popes instructions to them inspire confidence that the John Paul II Institute will continue to promote the teachings of the late Polish Pontiff. And unfortunately these are not the first indications that the work of the Instituteand, more importantly, the teaching of John Paul IIare being downgraded. Remember that the John Paul Institute was not represented among the participants in the first meeting of the Synod for the Family, and in Amoris Laetitia, his final summary of that Synod, Pope Francis was sparing in his citations of the tremendous work that John Paul II had done on the same topic.
The appointments of Archbishop Paglia and Msgr. Sequeri were announced on August 17 along with the higher-profile appointment of the American Bishop Kevin Farrell, formerly of Dallas, as the first prefect of the new dicastery for Laity, Family, and Life. In his charge to Bishop Farrell, Pope Francis said that the mission of the new office should be ever more clearly inscribed within the horizon of mercy, and referred to his image of the Church as a field hospital that should serve especially individuals most threatened by the new culture of competition and disposal. Few Catholics would disagree with that mission, I trust. But there is a distinct difference in tone between Pope Francis, with his complaints about a throwaway culture, and Popes John Paul II and Benedict XVI, with their grimmer portrayal of a culture of death.
Different Church leaders use different rhetoric, of course, and a change in tone does not necessarily mean a change in policy. But it is also noteworthy that Pope Francis, in his discussion of threats to marriage and family life, does not speak about the intrinsic evils that were condemned in Veritatis Splendor. (In fact that landmark encyclical is never cited in Amoris Laetitia!) The key questionsharpened by these latest Curial appointmentsis whether Pope Francis is deliberately moving away from the teachings of St. John Paul II on marriage, family, and life.
Funny thing about a throwaway culture.157 CATHOLIC Universities have supported planned parenthood in one way or another.Cardinal Newman society came out with the report a number of years ago.After they got caught,they cleaned up their act..A few years later,Cardinal Newman society found 12 of those universities continued to support planned parenthood..Maybe Francis should start cleaning up his own house before telling the rest of the world to clean theirs up.
Maybe Francis should start cleaning up his own house before telling the rest of the world to clean theirs up.
((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((
Thank you!!! Just what I was thinking...
More importantly, is he moving away from God’s teachings.
He’s moving away from the BIBLE on family and marriage.
Is the Pope Catholic?
Is the Pope Catholic? Not this one
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.