Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

An African cardinal asks a good question: What about Communion for polygamists? [Cath Cauc]
Catholic Herald ^ | January 6, 2017 | Fr. Alexander Lucie-Smith

Posted on 01/06/2017 2:31:41 PM PST by ebb tide

Virtually every priest who has worked in Africa knows that this is a serious pastoral issue

Every now and then someone says something interesting on Twitter. Just yesterday Cardinal Napier, the Archbishop of Durban, reminded us all of something we ought not to forget.

(see post below)

Cardinal Napier describes a real and pressing question: polygamy is widespread in Africa, and Catholics in the West cannot ignore this. Catholic teaching and practice must be such that they are able to be inculturated in a wide variety of settings. An initiative might go down well in Berlin or Vienna, but how will it play in Peoria, or Nairobi, or Durban, or Delhi or Manila? No one particular local Church has a monopoly on truth, and no one particular local culture can claim to have absolute insights that other cultures have to take on board. Cultural imperialism cannot be Catholic. When the missionaries came to Africa, they aimed – at their best – to introduce the Gospel of Christ, not Western culture.

But just as Western cultural insight cannot claim a monopoly on Christianity, African culture too must adapt to Christ and not the other way around, for Christ is the absolute value, and while the cultures of Africa are of value too, they are such only relatively speaking. Hence, on coming to Africa, the missionaries challenged certain deep-rooted cultural practices and did their very best to stamp them out. Missionaries in Kenya, for example, have fought against female genital mutilation for a century. And they have also condemned throughout Africa the practice of polygamy.

Progress against both practices has been patchy to say the least. We all know of famous polygamists such as the King of Swaziland who currently has 13 wives, and President Zuma of South Africa, who has six. The Church condemns this practice. Not only is it a form of institutionalized adultery, it is also deeply detrimental to the dignity of women. Polygamists may not receive Holy Communion, and polygamists who wish to be baptised have to abandon the practice first.

President Zuma’s six wives are all concurrent wives, not to mention various other liaisons, but here in the West we have serial polygamy, where people have one spouse at a time, getting a divorce between each new union. What Cardinal Napier’s question raises is this: is there a difference between the two?

For the African Church, this is a pressing issue. For example, in 2004 it was reported that nearly half of marriages in Senegal are polygamous. I know from my own former ministry in Kenya that polygamy is not at all unknown among Catholics. People in that sort of situation might well think that the admission of those in irregular second unions throws them some sort of lifeline.

Four Cardinals, as we know, have submitted five dubia to the Pope on the matter of the correct interpretation of Amoris Laetitia. Virtually every priest who has ever worked in Africa could submit a dubium on this matter too, namely, to quote Cardinal Napier: “If Westerners in irregular [marital] situations can receive Communion, are we to tell our polygamists and other ‘misfits’ that they too are allowed?”

If polygamists were ever admitted to Holy Communion for whatever reason, it would undo a century of work by the missionaries who have consistently taught that marriage is an exclusive and lifelong union between one man and one woman, and can only be dissolved by death. It would also severely damage the credibility of the Church, and undermine the authority of Scripture. Dubium means doubt, but on this matter there can be no doubt. We cannot admit polygamists to Holy Communion, whether serial ones of concurrent ones, whether Westerners or from other continents.


TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Moral Issues; Theology
KEYWORDS: africa; communion; francischurch; heresy; napier; polygamy
Cardinal Napier ‏@CardinalNapier

If Westerners in irregular situations can receive Communion, are we to tell our polygamists & other "misfits" that they too are allowed?

1 posted on 01/06/2017 2:31:41 PM PST by ebb tide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

Or Animal Lovers or NAMBLAtics. It’s all expressions of love!


2 posted on 01/06/2017 2:35:10 PM PST by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

Biblically speaking, you can make a better case for polygamy than you can divorce


3 posted on 01/06/2017 2:39:56 PM PST by Fai Mao (PIAPS for Prison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

My wound care nurse is a Zulu from South Africa/Zimbabwe and he has many polygamous relatives and ancestors. Common practice.


4 posted on 01/06/2017 2:41:50 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (You cannot invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

“If polygamists were ever admitted to Holy Communion for whatever reason, it would undo a century of work by the missionaries who have consistently taught that marriage is an exclusive and lifelong union between one man and one woman, and can only be dissolved by death.”

Maybe. If the man and his wives were married BEFORE becoming Christians, then there is a precedent for them receiving communion and still remaining in a polygamous marriage. It helps to know Church history.


5 posted on 01/06/2017 3:10:46 PM PST by vladimir998 (Apparently I'm still living in your head rent free. At least now it isn't empty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

Remember St.. Augustine?


6 posted on 01/06/2017 4:43:17 PM PST by keving (We get the government to vote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: keving

I remember him; and St Thomas has addressed this issue that St Augustine held.


7 posted on 01/06/2017 5:23:11 PM PST by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998

I know very little about that. Could you give us a couple more paragraphs to explain or illustrate?


8 posted on 01/06/2017 5:31:09 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o (I'm here to learn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

It was in the 12th century. Baltic pagans had been converted in large numbers. They practiced polygamy. They wanted to be Christians, but felt a a responsibility to their multiple wives. The pope - I think it was Alexander III, but it’s been almost 30 years since I read the primary source on this so I might be wrong about the pope - essentially decided to welcome polygamous men into the Church, just in that region, and just for one generation (i.e. they had to ALREADY be in a polygamous marriage and there would be no more such marriages for the next generation). His rationale was that holy men of the Old Testament had sometimes practiced polygamy so it could not be considered a definitive impediment to grace or holiness in itself. The pope considered more important that people be baptized and instructed in the faith, then definitely refused entry into the Church because of a polygamous marriage.


9 posted on 01/06/2017 6:40:25 PM PST by vladimir998 (Apparently I'm still living in your head rent free. At least now it isn't empty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998

Thank you for responding on that.

I suspect Charlemagne-era clergy might have accommodated the Saxons in just such a way-— just for the one generation-— but I don’t know that for a fact.


10 posted on 01/07/2017 8:36:37 AM PST by Mrs. Don-o (They said what's up is down, they said what isn't is, they put ideas in his head he thought were his)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

Maybe, but I would think they would appeal to the pope for a decision on that. I wonder what Charlemagne would think either way?


11 posted on 01/07/2017 9:42:04 AM PST by vladimir998 (Apparently I'm still living in your head rent free. At least now it isn't empty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998
A I remember it, Charlemagne gave the Saxons the choice of getting baptized or getting dead. 😱
12 posted on 01/07/2017 9:52:14 AM PST by Mrs. Don-o (They said what's up is down, they said what isn't is, they put ideas in his head he thought were his)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson