Posted on 11/12/2017 1:02:12 PM PST by ebb tide
We don’t look to The Wall Street Journal for its religion reporting. But a recent piece stands out. It shows American Catholicism at a crossroads. It’s rare that a single decision decides the future of a church in a nation. But we face such a moment now. As the Journal explains, the bishops will vote on a crucial staff post. Who will lead the Church’s pro-life efforts?
The vote is down to two candidates — Cardinal Blase Cupich, of Chicago, and Archbishop Joseph Naumann, of Kansas City — who represent the ideological poles of the U.S. church and have articulated different visions of what being pro-life should mean.
Read Christopher Manion at The Wanderer on what a fine pastor Archbishop Naumann is. Manion noted how
Archbishop Naumann ended diocesan ties to the Girl Scouts of America because it was pro-abortion. He and other Kansan bishops produced a video prior to the 2016 elections to be shown in all parishes that carried a statement to keep ‘the human rights catastrophe’ of abortion ‘at the forefront of their minds when voting’ as a ‘moral obligation’ for Catholics.
Cardinal Cupich represents the polar opposite approach. He has embarrassed himself repeatedly. How? Through blunt, foolish, partisan moralism on public policy. In a 2015 an Open Letter, Jason Jones called out Cupich. He cited Cupich’s
op-ed in response to the Planned Parenthood videos. As a victim of legal abortion who lost a daughter to it, I cannot imagine how you could have written this:
While commerce in the remains of defenseless children is particularly repulsive, we should be no less appalled by the indifference toward the thousands of people who die daily for lack of decent medical care; who are denied rights by a broken immigration system and by racism; who suffer in hunger, joblessness and want; who pay the price of violence in gun-saturated neighborhoods; or who are executed by the state in the name of justice.
Do you really not see what is uniquely evil about murdering children and selling their parts for profit? As Jesus told us, the poor we will have always with us, and we must advance their interests. But how can you compare the malice of organ-profiteering abortionists with the “indifference” that you (uncharitably?) attribute to fellow citizens who disagree with you about the optimal public policies helping the poor, reducing unemployment and violence and reforming immigration?
I said it here three weeks ago. Cupich’s “Seamless Garment” or “consistent life ethic” is an intellectual fraud.
[It] pretends that on every possible topic, from gun rights to immigration, there is a “pro-life” position, and that it invariably entails all of the following:
- More power for the government (i.e., grabbing guns).
- More seizure of wealth to be redistributed by politicians (raising taxes, lavishing money on welfare programs).
- Acting in what seems like the short-term interests of some people, without concern for long-term consequences (admitting millions of low-skill, left-wing, or sharia-loving immigrants).
- Enforcing “mercy” for some at the expense of justice for others (refusing to execute murderers).
Many on the Christian left pretend that you can’t really be against killing unborn babies for our sexual convenience unless you favor open borders, gun confiscation, an end to capital punishment, single-payer health insurance and massive welfare programs. Oddly, in most of the countries that have all those other programs (see Western Europe), abortion is legal. In most, the pro-life movement barely exists.
LifeSiteNews recently published a very telling piece. Claire Chretien noted “the fervor with which [Cupich] defends liberal political causes.” She cited “the dispassion with which he speaks on abortion.” Chretien continues:
No matter how concerned you are about the “budget” and political leaders “cooperating” to craft that budget to your liking, what you consider bad economics may be a social ill, but abortion will always remain an intrinsic evil.
St. John the Baptist didn’t talk to Herod about his tax policies or whether he was giving enough government benefits to the shepherds.
No, Jesus’ cousin told him the truth, that Herod was committing adultery. And he lost his life for it.
Dietrich Bonhoeffer didn’t fret about train ticket prices in Nazi Germany. He spoke truth to power about the genocide of Jews and eventually lost his life for it.
At the beating heart of Catholic, Christian faith, two certainties stand:
Ending life to make sex more convenient is profoundly evil. It’s not in the same ballpark as quarrels over optimal Medicaid budgets. Or background checks for guns. The latter’s a plate of bacon. You might be eating too much of it. The former’s a plate holding a human heart. An Aztec priest just plucked it out. Lumping the two together as “culinary issues” isn’t just foolish. It’s a lie.
Help us champion truth, freedom, limited government and human dignity. Support The Stream »
With this vote, America’s Catholic bishops will decide something huge. Will the Church in America confront the culture? Will She hew to Her core convictions? You know, like the Amish, the Orthodox Jews, the Mormons, and other serious religious groups?
Ending life to make sex more convenient is profoundly evil. It’s not in the same ballpark as quarrels over optimal Medicaid budgets. Or background checks for guns.
Or will it follow the example of the Episcopal and other Mainline denominations, which are quickly morphing into leftist NGOs?
A Cupich victory will be a clear win for Bergoglianism. On the other hand, a Cupich loss, satisfying as it will be to pro-lifers, will likely anger the powers that be in Vatican and cause them to double-down on remaking the American episcopacy in their image (i.e., Bishop Jim Martin SJ, anyone?). Classic example of the old song lyric, “Laugh about it, shout about it when you gotta choose... Every way you look at it, you lose.”
Cupich can conveniently be ignored for his term by any and all whose own bishops don't buy into his dreck.
On the other hand, Bishop Jim Martin, SJ (Deus quod avertat!) would be our burden to bear forever.
Chapter 2. The Second Commandment: Grave Sin Forbidden. And the second commandment of the Teaching; You shall not commit murder, you shall not commit adultery, you shall not commit pederasty, you shall not commit fornication, you shall not steal, you shall not practice magic, you shall not practice witchcraft, you shall not murder a child by abortion nor kill that which is born. You shall not covet the things of your neighbor, you shall not swear, you shall not bear false witness, you shall not speak evil, you shall bear no grudge. You shall not be double-minded nor double-tongued, for to be double-tongued is a snare of death. Your speech shall not be false, nor empty, but fulfilled by deed. You shall not be covetous, nor rapacious, nor a hypocrite, nor evil disposed, nor haughty. You shall not take evil counsel against your neighbor. You shall not hate any man; but some you shall reprove, and concerning some you shall pray, and some you shall love more than your own life.
What part of "you shall not murder a child by abortion nor kill that which is born" isn't understood?
They had better or it will be the end of their version of Christianity.
Cupich is an embarrassment to the point of seeming like a fifth columnist. BXVI would not have allowed him to come with 100 miles of the Vatican.
~ Cardinal Francis George
Of course they will choose Cupich, because they'll be afraid of what Francis will do to them if they reject his buddy. They've already proven how cowardly they are by not speaking out on Francis' heresies.
Don't forget, Cardinal Pietro Parolin (Vatican Secretary of State) will be there to a) spy on them and b) put pressure on them.
I truly hope I'm wrong.
Well, you might be right. However, if that turns out to be the case, I expect we will see more and more faithful Catholics closing there wallets when it comes to donating funds to their local Diocese. For some time now, I no longer donate to the Diocesan collections but do continue to donate to my local parish. That goes for all Vatican collections, to which I give nothing.
Most Jesuits who become bishops (and there are very, very few of them) are sent to the peripheries—like Alaska.
If Martin became a bishop, he’d be tied down managing a diocese, doing confirmations, etc. We would actually see and hear less of him.
If there is ever a Catholic Pope again, among his first acts MUST be the removal of Cupich, McElroy, and many other vicious anti-Christians appointed by Bergoglio.
Unfortunately, not true.
Cupich was not appointed a bishop by Bergoglio.
When it comes to episcopal appointments, Bergoglio is only marginally worse than JPII and BXVI.
Same here. I donate to my local parish but do NOT contribute to any Diocesan-wide fundraising or national “Catholic” organizations. I simply have NO trust in what would be done with my money.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.