Posted on 02/12/2018 10:33:26 AM PST by SeekAndFind
A 2015 Pew survey reported that the total number of Catholics in the United States dropped by 3 million since 2007, now comprising about 20 percent - or one-fifth - of the total population. Catholicism is losing more members than it gains at a higher rate than any other denomination a recent development which the radical progressives at Salon celebrate. Why is this an issue that should worry Americans and the Western world at large?
One key reason is that the fastest-growing religion in the country and around the world is Islam something Salon radicals also no doubt celebrate. The fundamentalist brand of Islam that is once again on the rise is antithetical, indeed openly hostile, to the values of Western civilization, and for many centuries Catholicism as a central component of European identity was a bulwark against its spread. But for various reasons the West has lost confidence in its cultural identity and moral authority in recent decades, and the result has been submission to decadence, to , and to Islam. If we are to reverse a civilization in rapid decline, we must undertake a resurgence of Western exceptionalism with a militant Christian ethos at its core.
For Catholics who have backslid or grown apathetic, that means waking up to what is at stake, and then making a renewed commitment to understanding and manifesting the tenets of their own religion, a religion that has been steered toward emasculation, socialism, and interfaith suicide by the radical left. For non-Catholics as well even atheists it means acknowledging how crucial a revivified Christianity is to a defense of Western civilization, and educating themselves about the myths and realities of Catholicism.
Enter John Zmiraks timely book, The Politically Incorrect Guide to Catholicism, published by Regnery. Zmirak is an editor, teacher, screenwriter, political columnist, and the author of the popular Bad Catholic's Guides and The Race to Save Our Century: Five Core Principles to Promote Peace, Freedom, and a Culture of Life. His work has appeared in First Things, The Weekly Standard, USA Today, and FrontPage Magazine, among other venues.
The books cover declares Catholicism to be the most politically incorrect institution in the world! and features a trinity of grinning nuns with guns itself politically incorrect enough to trigger leftists who prefer a less militant, more social justice-oriented, and submissive Christianity. The cover also features such triggering bullet points as:
and perhaps most politically incorrect and offensive:
Zmirak seeks to dispel misconceptions about the Catholic Church, including the notions that it is the greatest mainstay of the patriarchy, an institution designed to oppress the poor, an institution designed to liberate the poor, and even the Whore of Babylon mentioned in The Book of Revelation.
In fact, Zmirak notes, among the good things the Church has brought to the world are the university, the hospital, the worlds greatest art, modern science, the strongest check in history on the power of the state, and overall a new and improved Western civilization in the wake of the fall of the Roman Empire. In our cultures rush to inflate Islams reputation by crediting Muslims with inventing everything from algebra to the astrolabe, Catholicisms actual achievements by comparison are world-beating.
The Guides dozen chapters cover such topics as where the Church stands on birth control and abortion, the limits of papal authority, the free market, immigration, amnesty, socialism, progressivism, sex, science, self-defense and capital punishment, and yes, the scandal of priestly pederasts, which the author does not whitewash.
Zmirak addresses the fragmentation of the Catholic Church which began with the Second Vatican Council in 1960 and remains to this day, exacerbated by the issue of birth control. He covers the impact of secular modernity on the Church, and the explosion and radicalization of progressive dissent which embraced a social justice agenda and which has resulted in many Catholics taking positions on economics, welfare policy, and defense that [a]re a virtual mirror image of the Democratic Party platform.
This explains, the author notes, how politicians like Nancy Pelosi and Joseph Biden can support partial-birth abortion, same-sex marriage, and legal mandates that nuns such as the Little Sisters of the Poor distribute the morning-after abortion pill and still go to Holy Communion. They havent abandoned the Church. They are in fact its progressive vanguard
As for the Crusades and the Catholic just war doctrine, Zmirak points out that the Church has never taught that pacifism is the appropriate response to conflict. True, there are strict requirements for legitimate defense, but Christian pacifism would leave Christian nations defenseless from conquest and persecution at the hands of aggressive non-Christians. If non-resistance to violence were practiced consistently, he adds, it would mean that wed have no police either, and that parents should not defend their helpless children from murder or rape. The Crusades, which today are condemned as evidence of a hideous, anti-Christian endeavor for which the Church should never stop apologizing and which Muslims are justified in resenting to this day, were in fact, in large part, a heroic if doomed attempt to liberate conquered nations from the yoke of intolerant Islam.
Zmirak concludes the book with a call to arms: There can be no truce, no respite, no surrender. As the price of calling ourselves Christians, we must make our case for natural law, religious and economic liberty, the sanctity of life, and the truth about sex year in and year out, regardless of the vagaries of particular candidates and party platforms.
He notes that he collaborated with Whole Life program founder Jason Jones to identify the five Ideologies of Evil that made the twentieth century the bloodiest in human history:
In opposition to those evils, Zmirak and Jones list fundamental Catholic principles that must animate any decent politics:
There is so much more to The Politically Incorrect Guide to Catholicism than this brief review may suggest. The book is dense with information (including thirty pages of endnotes), but it is entertaining as well as enlightening for both believers and non-believers. It also provides a wealth of other sources for further investigation, in frequent sidebars called Books Youre Not Supposed to Read. In this time of rising Islamophilia and openly anti-Christian bias among our cultural elites, John Zmiraks book itself is one youre not supposed to read, but definitely should.
Written for cathaholoics?
Excellent post, I loved it!
Define cathohilcs ?
Identifying with a religion and actually being an example of that religion ain't the same thing, especially today.
I'm non-denominational and believe in the Bible but even on my best day I am not as much an example of Biblical teaching as I wish I was.
Addicted to catholicism? ;-)
cathoholics? I can’t spell either!
Hard bump.
Interesting. However, it brings to mind the disconnect between what the Catholic church is on paper, and what is preached by the leaders.
I will just leave it at that.
Agreed. Great post.
JoMa
Bump!
Catholic teaching favors gun rights, capitalism, and a strong defense
Catholic social teaching isnt liberal, its conservative
Catholic doctrine doesnt require open borders
and perhaps most politically incorrect and offensive:
The Crusades are something to be proud of
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
All of which is why the New World Order decided they needed the ImPopester to destroy the Church.
bkmk
Sorry, but I don’t believe the Pew studies or surveys whatsoever; haven’t for quite some time. I don’t have a clue as to their methodology, but if they’ve limited their examination to the Northeastern/Western US then yes, they would find a sharp drop in the number of Catholics in those areas.
Where I live, in Texas that is, the churches are PACKED! We’ve definitely seen something on the order of a 15% increase in the last 10 years and that’s observable across three parishes I’ve belonged to. I postulate that what Pew hasn’t taken into account is the large number of people who’ve fled the Northeast corridor do to either retirements or to avoid outrageous taxes. Same is true even for California.
Think about this for a moment......how could Pew ever genuinely find out Catholic population size. FROM WHAT I’VE SEEN, EVEN THE CHURCH DOESN’T KNOW!
But wait......if you hate Christians in general and Catholics in particular, you’re going to report “People fleeing Catholicism at rapid pace”.
It fits the Progressive narrative!
they keep lumping catholics.
Byzantines ? or Coptics ? or ...
I guess the clue is Nuns with Guns.
I’ll have to check it out. Thanks.
Care to document that claim?
Please note the distinction between "Catholicism teaches X" and "some Catholics teach X". You can find some "Catholics" somewhere who teach "X" for any value of "X".
Can you show me a magisterial document that says "most of the Hebrew Bible is mythology"?
most of the Hebrew Bible is mythology
Care to document that claim?
It's not my claim. You carefully trimmed by post. I said that the Catholic Church says that it is mostly mythology.
Please note the distinction between "Catholicism teaches X" and "some Catholics teach X". You can find some "Catholics" somewhere who teach "X" for any value of "X".
Pick any Catholic Bible with a nihil obstat and an imprimatur (other than a Douay-Rheims reprint). They all teach evolution, higher criticism, and "de-mythologization" (denying the historicity of Esther, Daniel, and Jonah, among other books). Note that the nihil obstat means "no objection" and that the imprimatur guarantees that a book contains nothing in conflict with Catholic doctrine. You're simply being dishonest here.
It doesn't matter what "Catholicism" teaches if Catholics all believe and teach something else entirely. And the past several Popes (maybe going all the way back to 1914), almost all Catholic clergy and theologians, and all mainstream Catholic publications and web sites teach evolution, higher criticism, and "de-mythologization." Deny that if you have the brass. Furthermore, Newman and Malachi Martin were evolutionists while Fulton Sheen and Frank Sheed were Teilhardians.
Your co-religionists routinely post articles right here teaching the same blasphemies, yet I don't recall you ever arguing with them about it. As a matter of fact, even Catholic FReepers who claim to be creationists refuse to get involved. And if I recall correctly, didn't you used to promote the same nonsense?
I'm still waiting for an apology over "Billy Bob's Glory Barn" (an ethnic slur against rural white Protestant Americans). I know I'll never get it, but I'm still waiting.
Can you show me a magisterial document that says "most of the Hebrew Bible is mythology"?
You're being dishonest again. I could refer you to some old, outdated official documents that seem to teach creationism, but all mainstream Catholics today reject them.
Your church deserves what is happening to it. It couldn't happen to a more deserving bunch.
The Church does not “teach” evolutionary theory. Nor does it condemn it. Same with many theories outside the realm of religion. If your point is Catholics do not adhere to “Creationism,” again, it’s not taught, nor condemned. These are matters of discretion, not doctrine.
Catholicism is not full of rules like some people portray. We have dogma, doctrine, praxis, and then people are free to think and choose.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.