I don't expect you to understand this, but all the parallels in the world you can find between the TaNa"KH and the "new testament" do not prove that chrstianity is true or a "fulfillment" of the Torah. The Torah is the permanent true religion. The notion that the Prophets prophesied that it would later be replaced by something else is merely an assertion of chrstianity. Assertions prove nothing. To simply ceaselessly quote the "new testament" or repeat chrstian claims does not prove either the "new testament" or chrstianity. This is a logical fallacy known as "affirmation of the consequent." Ironically, the same fallacy is used by evolutionists.
I know telling you that was useless, but you can't claim I haven't answered you. Meanwhile, your only response to any defense of Torah is merely to repeat chrstianity's claims (without even trying to prove them).
Noah came twice. First as a faithful witness. Was lifted (by boat) above the earth. He returned and inherited the earth.
Abraham came twice to the promised land. First as Abram. Then off to Egypt where was respected. He returned to the promised land, where he was given a new name, and offspring.
Jacob was born in the land of promise. He left alone, but returned to claim his inheritance, and had his name changed to Israel.
Then the afore mentioned Joseph, and Moses.
Then there’s David. He came in faith, and was rejected, living away from his own. He returned to be the ruler of the nation.
I think you are a hypocrite. You believe what you want when it comes to the words of Moses.