Posted on 11/11/2021 11:59:07 AM PST by Red Badger
Nobody's asking the obvious question: Were the pastor's heart problems caused by the Covid-19 "vaccine"?
Generally speaking, I like Franklin Graham. I think he’s a true believer and his messaging is mostly aligned with a Biblical worldview. I’ve taken exception to his rhetoric in recent months as it pertains to Covid-19 “vaccines.” He’s an adamant promoter of the experimental drugs and went so far as to claim Jesus would have approved of the jabs.
“I think if there were vaccines available in the time of Christ, Jesus would have made reference to them and used them,” he said during an ABC News interview.
In recent weeks he has voice opposition to the vaccine mandates, making a distinction between the personal choices people should make and being forced by government to make that choice. He wants people to willingly get vaxxed, so for that he deserves some credit. Other pastors have gone so far as to agree with medical tyranny, segregating their own churches between the vaxxed and unvaxxed.
As Pastor Sam Jones rightly asserted, government cannot require or force vaccination without violating religious liberty. Graham seems to agree even if he is a believer in the vaccines.
On Monday, Graham underwent heart surgery at the Mayo Clinic to remove his pericardium. According to a press release:
Franklin Graham successfully underwent a specialized heart surgery today at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota. In recent months, Franklin had developed constrictive pericarditis, inflammation, and hardening of the sac around the heart that compresses the heart and prevents it from working properly. The surgery involved removing the pericardium.
His doctors expect a full recovery and assured him that he should be able to return to his normal activity and ministry schedule. Mr. Graham said that he is looking forward to multiple opportunities across the globe in 2022 to proclaim the Gospel of Jesus Christ and invite people to put their faith in Him. He is also eager to resume riding his motorcycle by springtime. He and his family appreciate everyone’s prayers.
A news report by Christian Post covered the surgery but did not make mention of the conspicuous timing of his ailment. Pericarditis is widely known to be an adverse reaction to the Covid injections, but neither Christian Post nor any of the mainstream media reports on his surgery mentioned it. We will.
The timing of his pericarditis, which he has been fighting “in recent months,” aligns with him getting jabbed earlier this year. Most of the reports of heart problems due to the vaccines show they start occurring within days, but there are indications the lasting effect of the vaccines also weakens the heart over time. Hospitals across the country and around the world are being flooded with people experiencing problems with their hearts and lungs, a phenomenon that seems unambiguously tied to the masses getting jabbed.
As Steve MacDonald noted on Granite Grok, the need to wake up and acknowledge problems with pericarditis and myocarditis is rapidly rising:
As the “official” VAERS Vaccine Body Count (the US only) works its way to 20,000, one of the questions is, who has to die before you believe? The other is, when can we declare the sudden global rise in cases of Myocarditis a pandemic?
The problem has become more pronounced as the number of athletes getting sick or dropping dead from the vaccine rises. A curve that no one in the supposed leadership ranks seems the least bit interested in flattening. They don’t even want to talk about it. We’ve been talking about it.
But we’re not alone. The number of sites collecting and sharing these incidents is rising. Nothing mainstream, lord no. They’ve got their marching orders and healthy young people dropping dead after receiving the sacred host is anathema. Be vewy, vewy, qwiet. They’re hunting … us?
The silence about this growing problem has been deafening, and it’s discouraging that many Evangelicals are willfully ignoring the connections between a massive number of people, particularly men, acquiring myocarditis or pericarditis and the rise in vaccination numbers. We will likely never know for sure if Franklin Graham’s pericarditis was caused by his injections, but why is nobody (including Graham) even asking the question?
The answer is disturbing. The vast majority of those who support the vaccines do not want to know about adverse reactions. As illogical as this may sound even to those who are doing the ignoring, it is the only possible explanation for the void. Nobody outside of the “fringe” news outlets or “anti-vaxxers” seem to have any interest in discovering why there is such a tremendous increase in heart problems across the globe that aligns perfectly with the masses getting jabbed.
They don’t want to know and they definitely don’t want YOU to know. Or, to be more accurate, they don’t want their suspicions to be confirmed. Anyone who acquires a myocarditis or pericarditis in months, weeks, or days following their injection has to question whether the vaccines caused it, but they absolutely refuse to take their questions public. For someone like Graham who has encouraged countless people to get jabbed, questioning the safety of the jabs now would be career suicide. He’d lose financial supporters wholesale.
Even the CDC quietly acknowledged there are risks of developing myocarditis and pericarditis following the jabs. They did their best to paint it as no big deal, easily treatable. They claimed, “Most patients with myocarditis or pericarditis who received care responded well to medicine and rest and felt better quickly.”
Tell that to people like Graham who had his chest cut open and his pericardium removed.
Eventually, it will be so obvious that the drugs are causing the heart problems that nobody will be able to ignore it any longer. Until then, we need to keep as many people informed as possible.
i disagree with pastor graham on the covid vaccines certainly: they are now proven neither “safe or effective” and should be withdrawn or marked “these are not safe by any previous standard, they are experimental, take at your own risk” immediately.
but at least this report and post finally gave a quote on what he said, which i’ve been waiting for.
what he said was completely conditional and hypothetical.
as just i thought, the claim of what he said by some here was bs.
he didn’t say Jesus would have approved of the mrna jab as people have been spouting.
he said “if” generally vaccines were around at the time and he also prefaced his statement with the condition of himself doing the “thinking.” in short, he made it clear that he was giving his opinion.
while i disagree with what he said if that quote is right, it’s still very different than the flat statement that: “Jesus would have supported the covid jabs.”
sometimes i wish people were more precise about their claims on this site.
The vaxxine acts like a virus, it settles in on injuries and scar tissue. Many viruses seek the heart.
Why are you attacking me? I didn’t say anything. I just posted the article without comment....................
and COMPLETELY avoidable.
Looking at some of the responses all I have to say - there are a huge number of “coincidences” with the jab. Like the news talking head, Marc Lamont Hill, 42, who suddenly has blood clot issues - but “it’s not the vax!!!” Kids having heart attacks. What’s different this year? What could it possibly be? I think I know.
“...they should do a study...”
The last thing they want to do is find any relationship to an adverse reaction.
Pfizer has been caught altering research data. Maybe they could do a study just to alter the data to fit their need.
I haven’t posted anything about him but right now we are in a battle against fascism as great as any time in history and he has advocated for the fascist’s primary weapon and invoked Jesus Christ while doing it so I have a problem with people attacking him based on his grotesque ignorance. I don’t wish illness on anyone but I’m grateful for this post because I didn’t know that the man was such a fool and I’m fine with fools being called out. Especially Christian fools who will be heard by non-believers with an IQ over 5 and lead them further away from Christ rather than bringing them to him.
I apologize....I was knee jerk!
I will always defend Franklin Graham but I need to do it in Christian love.
Was he pushing the vaccine because he found another way to fleece people? Karma that he has been stricken with results of taking his medicine.
I apologize.....Please see post 29
THIS is the type of post that made me lose my temper.....
Quote
We just finished our boxes for the children......How can you all attack him so meanly????
Drug pushers and drug shovers are not to be trusted..
Even if they are a Pope or a Pastor
As for the children, the witches and ghouls in the pharmaceutical industry have prepared things for the children, too.
The same snake oil Franklin Graham peddled
I wish those attacking on this thread had done 1/100th as much for the Kingdom as he has. I’d be happy if I had done 1/1,000 as much. But because he supports people willingly getting a vaccine, as I do....he’s treated like trash here.
Amazing. Like you, I’ll offer prayers and let God sort things out.
BTW - I bet Franklin Graham endorses using the locks on the front door instead of just “trusting Jesus” to keep the thieves out.
No problem.
There are many denominations on FR, and they don’t always see eye to eye on doctrine.
Catholic/Protestant/Mormon/Baptist/Methodist/Presbyterian/Episcopalian/Evangelical/Charismatic/Unaffiliated..............................
True and exactly what happened to Hank Aaron trying to convince blacks to get the vax.
Thank you
Your post is kinder.
Agreed, but not sure if he would tell you to have the thief have the key to the lock.
IF the inoculations are causal then why isn’t everyone coming down with heart problems??
No it doesn’t say that
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.