Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

6th Circuit Affirms That County Clerk Kim Davis Had No Qualified Immunity Defense
Religion Clause ^ | 10/2/22 | Howard Friedman

Posted on 10/10/2022 6:31:13 PM PDT by marshmallow

In Ermold v. Davis, (6th Cir., Sept. 29, 2022), the U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a Kentucky federal district court decision that Rowan County Clerk Kim Davis does not have qualified immunity in a suit against her for stopping the issuance of all marriage licenses to avoid issuing licenses to same-sex couples. The court said in part:

[P]laintiffs have not only “alleged” but also now “shown” that Davis violated their constitutional right to marry.... And, as we held three years ago, that right was “clearly established in Obergefell.”

The court held that insofar as Davis has raised a free exercise defense under the First Amendment, that issue should be resolved when the case goes to trial and not at the current motion-to-dismiss stage.


TOPICS: Current Events; Religion & Culture; Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS: 2timothy3verses1to7; 6thcircuit; 80percenthivcasesmen; daniel12verse10; genderdysphoria; homofascism; homosexualagenda; kentucky; kimdavis; romans1verses18to22; rowancounty; samesexmirage; sixthcircuit; unitedstatesofsodom

1 posted on 10/10/2022 6:31:13 PM PDT by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

“Davis violated their constitutional right to marry”

Ya? And where is that in the constitution?


2 posted on 10/10/2022 6:32:48 PM PDT by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

This is STILL going on? They won’t let that poor woman alone?


3 posted on 10/10/2022 6:33:18 PM PDT by Reddy (BO stinks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crz

Here’s the good news, it looks like this New York judge’s ruling legalizing polygamy will likely make its way to the Supreme Court. And looky here, just earlier this year, Clarence Thomas said the Court needed to reexamine Obergefell.
The dissenters on the Court said this would happen when they decided to make gay marriage a “right”.


4 posted on 10/10/2022 6:35:14 PM PDT by quikstrike98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: quikstrike98

I have always been a proponent of polygamy.

Some years ago when the demands for gay marriage were fomenting on my state I demanded polygamy too.

I was horribly savaged and maligned by everyone on all sides.


5 posted on 10/10/2022 7:02:49 PM PDT by algore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: algore

The Republican party was founded on the twin principles of abolition of slavery, and the abolition of polygamy. What do you know, Americans who saw it in practice found that it resulted in conditions little better than slavery for the wives. Also, polygamy is very unhealthy for a society. Look to the Middle East when you have a whole region full of young men who can’t get laid. Polygamy winds up leaving some guys unable to find a mate. That leads to very bad results when it’s widespread.


6 posted on 10/10/2022 7:05:05 PM PDT by quikstrike98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

And yet Lois Lerner faced no consequence…


7 posted on 10/10/2022 7:19:18 PM PDT by IncPen ("Inside of every progressive is a Totalitarian screaming to get out" ~ David Horowitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quikstrike98

There are always lots of men who cannot get laid.

If a wise man can and will support 300 wives and 600 concubines the burden on society is lessened.

Probably he should nominates for sainthood too.


8 posted on 10/10/2022 7:49:06 PM PDT by algore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: algore

No, we will pay for this in our taxes on welfare for families that can’t feed all their kids.


9 posted on 10/10/2022 7:50:02 PM PDT by quikstrike98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: quikstrike98

I would send this back to that court and ask them the question.

Where is this in the constitution?

They’d have to vacate that ruling.

Course, one never knows with those clowns.


10 posted on 10/10/2022 8:30:46 PM PDT by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: algore

The wiseman is usually quite powerful to have that kind of money. Usually has power to seize riches from others, so society is not necessarily benefited if he seized riches from others to feed himself and his consorts.


11 posted on 10/10/2022 8:40:29 PM PDT by Getready (Wisdom is more valuable than gold and harder to find.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Kentucky’s state constitution defines marriage as being between a man and a woman. Marriage is not mentioned in the U.S. constitution.


12 posted on 10/10/2022 8:53:21 PM PDT by lakecumberlandvet (Appeasement never works.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reddy

[[This is STILL going on? They won’t let that poor woman alone?]]

When the left lock onto someone- they NEVER let go- they are obsessed with ruining said person


13 posted on 10/10/2022 9:09:05 PM PDT by Bob434 (question)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

The Supreme Court can declare state law unconstitutional, but it can’t legislate new law to replace what it declared unconstitutional.

As I recall, Kentucky did not change their law or Constitutional definition of marriage at the time as a result of the Supreme Court decision.

I don’t see how Kim Davis had legal authority to issue a marriage license to anyone at all.


14 posted on 10/10/2022 9:34:34 PM PDT by KrisKrinkle (c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crz
"“Davis violated their constitutional right to marry” Ya? And where is that in the constitution?" It is not, but Roberts and a majority read it into the Constitution, thus making it unconstitutional for states to deny it, as well as for anyone to discriminate against any who fall under this disposition and behavior-based classification. Next up, those who claim a disposition toward mating with animals (consent presumed) and or consuming human flesh (under prior consent of the consumed) can be a protected class, and be favored above other candidates for enrollment or employment under affirmative action. Be wise now therefore, O ye kings: be instructed, ye judges of the earth. Serve the Lord with fear, and rejoice with trembling. (Psalms 2:10-11)
15 posted on 10/11/2022 6:10:15 AM PDT by daniel1212 (Turn to the Lord Jesus as a damned+destitute sinner, trust Him who saves, be baptized + follow Him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
It didn't help that KRS was silent on the issue, otherwise she'd have had an out.

The whole imbroglio did elect an otherwise unpalatable Republican Goobernor.

16 posted on 10/11/2022 6:11:59 AM PDT by StAnDeliver (Tanned, rested, and ready.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: algore
"If a wise man can and will support 300 wives and 600 concubines the burden on society is lessened. Probably he should nominates for sainthood too."

Of course, the New York case West 49th St., LLC v. O'Neill and 90% of all polygamists outside of Mormonism are homosexuals, but you knew that, didn't you.

17 posted on 10/11/2022 6:15:31 AM PDT by StAnDeliver (Tanned, rested, and ready.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Police have “qualified immunity” to violate the First Amendment and several others, but a court clerk has no immunity to refuse to grant a license not authorized by statute? We’ve gone down the rabbit hole.


18 posted on 10/11/2022 9:17:04 AM PDT by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson