Posted on 03/23/2024 10:46:18 AM PDT by ebb tide
Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.—George Orwell, 1984.
Tucker Carlson recently interviewed a Chinese woman named Xi Van Fleet. After Mao’s culture revolution, Xi sought and received asylum in the United States in the 1970s. She soon came to love and defend America. This became especially evident when, in 2020, she realized the United States was undergoing a communist revolution, fabricated not upon a conflict of class, but rather that of race. (Fabricated is the operative word in the last sentence.) Although Xi never wanted to be involved in politics in the United States, she spoke at a Loudon Co. (VA) school board meeting. This was because she feared the youth of this country was being brainwashed like those in Mao’s China in the 1960s. Xi quickly gained a massive following among American conservatives who believe her: America is undergoing a communist-coup.
Xi described how China underwent its own “Defund the Police” when the “Red Guard” students replaced normal law-and-order in China during Mao’s “seizure of power.” Although Mao would eventually disband and betray his own paramilitary students, he originally took these “Red Guards” from the ranks of the rich youth in order to advance his communist revolution. Mao invented a new, fake history of China, terminating intellectual opposition to his atheism and communism.
What does this have to do with the Catholic Church? Keep in mind that Cardinal Suenens (a liberal) once proudly declared: “Vatican II is the French Revolution in the Church.” (Yes, this was a liberal bragging about this!) And, as you know, the French Revolution was the prototype of the errors of Russia, warned about by Our Lady of Fatima. For a successful revolution (economic or liturgical) one’s own cultural history has to be undone, forgotten and ultimately replaced by a fake one.
Historical amnesia then greases the skids for moral revolutions in all matters of State. But apparently this is also true in the Catholic Church hierarchy. Even a growing number of non-traditionalists will admit that a document like Fiducia Pooplicans could have only been possible following “the changes in the Church” of the 1960s. Why? Because “the Council” re-created Divine Revelation in so-called “ecumenism” and then revamped the Church’s liturgical history in overhauling not just the Mass, but all seven sacraments. At the beginning of the 1960s in Rome, the message of the “progressives” was: “Please let us try the experiment of ecumenism and the Novus Ordo.” But by the end of the 1960s, the progressives would not let any of the traditionalists (priests or brothers or nuns) remain in the congregations they hijacked. Strange that this liturgical revolution in Rome took place in the exact same decade as Mao’s cultural revolution in China—the 1960s.
Not only was doctrine and liturgy changed over the past 70 years, but the history of the Catholic Church was revamped. From numerous saints being removed from the calendar to the modern-myth that “the new Mass is older than the old Mass” (re-read the last part in quotes to see if you’re part of the brainwashed flock) the truth is that all of Catholic history got overhauled in the minds of most Catholics since the 1960s. Why? So that we might forget our own history and believe in a new one. Even better: “You must believe in the new, fabricated history of the Catholic Church or you’re disobedient.”
The pinnacle of this brainwashing is that the one currently squatting in a major Catholic Church today is allegedly the “merciful one” crushing all intellectual opposition, especially that small faction of Catholics who maintain the true history of the Catholic Church. Through this squatter, the errors of Russia have been put on turbo overdrive in Rome over the last eleven years. One aspect of this is the document Traditiones Custodes, allegedly limiting the use of the Latin Mass. Is the name Traditiones Custodes (Guardians of Tradition) ironic as it attempts to destroy tradition? No. It is intentional. Remember: Mao had to destroy his own country’s culture in order to create a new history, claiming to be the guardian of all history in China.
Now does the title Traditiones Custodes start to make sense?
Now does the title Traditiones Custodes start to make sense?
Ping
I cannot think of a more damning characterization of it. The French Revolution was demonic.
Yes, it was.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.