Posted on 04/30/2024 11:21:10 PM PDT by Texan4Life
Creationism vs. the Theory of Evolution
The Charlie Kirk Show
Dr. Randy Guliuzza: There is No Solid Scientific Evidence for Evolution
https://rumble.com/v4sjoab-dr.-randy-guliuzza-there-is-no-solid-scientific-evidence-for-evolution.html
Dr. Randy Guliuzza Discusses Tucker Carlson's Viral Attacks on Evolution
https://rumble.com/v4sjoct-dr.-randy-guliuzza-discusses-tucker-carlsons-viral-attacks-on-evolution.html
Dr. Randy Guliuzza Unpacks Scientific Observations Supporting the Authenticity of the Bible
https://rumble.com/v4sjohk-dr.-randy-guliuzza-unpacks-scientific-observations-supporting-the-authentic.html
Is Evolution Real? Dr. Randy Guliuzza Debunks Darwin
https://rumble.com/v4sjojh-is-evolution-real-dr.-randy-guliuzza-debunks-darwin.html
Of course evolution is real. Just study the science.
Sure.
So is *climate change*, transgenderism, and Covid.
They all *follow the science, too.
It goes to show how reliable *science* is and how thoroughly it’s been hijacked and corrupted.
“Of course evolution is real. Just study the science.”
There is some very serious science that convincingly argues the opposite.
All of nature displays purpose. A bird’s wings serve a purpose. Chlorophyll serves a purpose. Our immune system serves a purpose. Purpose implies intent. How can intent exist without intelligence? Case closed.
-End Ordovician (444 million years ago; mya) -Late Devonian (360 mya) -End Permian (250 mya) -End Triassic (200 mya) -Cretaceous period (66 mya)that killed off the dinosaurs
There will be more to come... Mankind won't be around after the next one
“Just study the science.”
“The science” that gave us Fauci, murderous “vaccines”, climate change, 25 genders ... THAT “science”? Hubby is a PhD in Physics and knows the theory of evolution is just that — a THEORY.
Complexity and design also show intelligence behind it.
The idea that randomness can on occasion produce results that look like order is a failed argument because it can happen on a simple level, like I’ll give them the structure of crystals, for example, that is incredibly simple. It does not even begin to rise to the level of complexity of the smallest single celled microbe.
And there’s more to it than that. Science cannot explain what the difference is between a living human being and a dead body and why when a person dies, decay happens so quickly. Entropy is a strong part of the universe.
For entropy to be overcome to such a degree as we’ve seen requires work to be put into the system. It simply cannot happen as a result of random occurrence for so long a time.
Some of mankind is working to ensure it to happen.
Yes, I encourage you to study the science.
It is the statisticians, mathematicians, and molecular-biology chemists, (many from the world’s most prestigious institutions), who are leading the challenge to evolution.
I have been so curious about the complexity of life that this year I took a two two -semester chemistry course for STEM majors. This summer I will take Statistics, and in the fall I begin organic chemistry. My goal is to intensely study molecular-biology chemistry.
I am retired from my profession but I find the subject fascinating.
Carbon dating was used on objects known to be only hundreds or a thousand years old.
The carbon dating method dated them to be millions of years old.
Flawed science is not science.
https://www.lehigh.edu/~inbios/Faculty/Behe.html
\/
heres some science for you
this phd wrote the textbook most colleges use
about chemical predisposition of life
after more years of study, he proved his theories were all disproven by him since
he came to faith like c.s. lewis did...
” dragged into the kingdom of God kicking and screaming “
he now writes about REAL creation science.
educate youreself .
IF Darwin could have seen the complexity of the single cell, Darwin would have given up on his theory of the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life...
IF Darwin could have seen the complexity of the single cell, Darwin would have given up on his theory of the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life...
Francis Crick, co-discover of DNA said that there was no way it just happened by chance. A complex code that was used to create every living thing.
Of course he couldn’t attribute it to God, so he figures aliens sent the DNA code out into space to populate other planets. Pansperma he called it IIRC.
Although that just shifts the evolution off to another planet.
Even some evolutionists admit that gradual evolution isn’t shown in the fossil record. (Darwin thought that the study of fossils, becoming more important at his time, would find
more discoveries showing gradualism.) Now they theorize “punctuated equilibrium” where things are gradual until one healthy mutant happens along that creates a whole new thing. The “hopeful monster” they call it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.