Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Phantom Lord
I don't see liberals advocating the banning of sexual practices in the privacy of homes.

Yes, that is only done in China as far as I know. Liberals here are most likely very envious of that power.

Not only do they want into the bedroom, they want to put "sex police" at the door....

Sounds like you take the Carville's and Begala's of the world at their word. Please cite for me any documentation that any pro-life group, any "religious right" group that has proposed sex police at your bedroom door. That is a bald-faced lie. I recently heard that real freedom is the capacity to choose what is good. Oppressed people don't have the ability to make the good choice. All that the article that initiated this thread advocates is the excercise of your free will to make the good choice. No mention of sex police. You are merely perpetuating falsehoods that liberals would be proud of. Perhaps you would be better served by augmenting your sense of morality from sources other than MTV.

143 posted on 04/09/2002 6:08:38 PM PDT by St.Chuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]


To: St.Chuck
I have had numerous discussions one here with posters that would be catagorized as the "religous right" and openly agree that they are. And more than a few of them have expressed strong support of laws that ban sexual practices in private residences, including between married couples. They support the strong enforcement of current laws on the books baning such practices as anal and oral sex and getting laws banning such passed in states that do not have them on the books. They would also like to criminalize homosexual sexual practices.

If thats not the "sex police", then what is?

When conducted in a private residence it is a private matter and should be of no concern to others. When conducted in public it is another story and those engaging in public acts should be prosecuted.

One particular poster who shall remain nameless (to protect the stupid) even wants to make premarital sex illegal and FORCE those that engage in it to marry! And if the father of the girl is opposed to her getting married, then the boy is to pay him restitution! I am not making this up. I dont think even Serpent and Forehead could come up with such wacky ideas.

150 posted on 04/09/2002 8:22:08 PM PDT by Phantom Lord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson