Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
The article starts out with some bland platitudes but gathers momentum as it rolls along:
We live in an age of willful blindness and willful forgetfulness. Philistines do not know that virtually every thrust that they make against Christian belief was anticipated and articulated in the sed contra objections of the doctors of the Church themselves. They do not know that the debates of which the moderns are so proud ultimately resolve into arguments that arose in past ages among Catholic philosophers and theologians—realism versus nominalism, the limits of natural human knowledge, the tension between philosophical skepticism and rational dogmatism. To cite one example among so many, in seventeenth–century France one found scholasticism of various philosophical stripes, Thomist and Scotist revivals, an Augustinian revival, Cartesian, Aristotelian, and Malebranchist schools of Catholic natural philosophy, a flowering of mysticism as well as debates about the dangers of mysticism. There were deep disputes between Jansenists and Jesuits. Dominicans, Franciscans, and Jesuits debated each other over the nature of non–Christian cultures and the scope and limits of natural law and natural reason. Montaigne, Charron, Mersenne, Gassendi, and the singular Aristotelian Barbay; Pascal, Arnauld, Fenelon; devotees of Suarez, Salamanca, Louvain, the Sorbonne, and Port Royal—–all living and flourishing within the bosom of the Catholic Church.

This is a truly sad and tragic situation.

I swore to myself after leaving college that I would never read a book again. I used to tell people, "If it's a book, I haven't read it." Why? Because I was given nothing but garbage to read and had associated reading with pain. Looking back, it was probably a good survival mechanism – it saved me from jumping out a window.

In fact, I didn't pick up a book again until four or five years after graduation. By the grace of God I picked up a Bible, played some "Bible roulette," and things have improved steadily since then.

5 posted on 05/09/2002 4:52:27 AM PDT by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Aquinasfan
In terms of the deepest meaning of American pluralism, those who make the latter choices enrich us all because they allow individuals to realize the fullest potentials of their choices. Where would Judaism be without its Talmud Torahs and its Yeshivas? Where would secular humanism be without its Harvard? Where would American Catholicism be without its truly Catholic institutions of higher education?

Where would America be without ANY civilisation we inherited from Christendom?

I fail to understand how disparate groups each making "choices" acording to their various philosophies "enrich" us at all. Unless one lives in Christendom (and we no longer do) all these "choices" mean nothing, as our deracinated culture continues to plunge into evermore dark, violent, and delusional activities.

I found it ironic that a non-Catholic is lecturing the Cardinal Newman Society about how crucial it is for a Catholic to present the fullness of the Faith.

6 posted on 05/09/2002 5:18:42 AM PDT by Catholicguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Aquinasfan
"By the grace of God I picked up a Bible, played some "Bible roulette," and things have improved steadily since then."

Try the CCC along with the New Testament and let the Holy Spirit turn the roulette wheel for you. This became a favorite for me during pregnancy...and kept my blood pressure way down.
8 posted on 05/09/2002 6:29:38 AM PDT by Domestic Church
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson