Posted on 06/10/2002 9:05:25 AM PDT by Siobhan
VATICAN CITY, JUNE 9, 2002 (ZENIT.org).- A step toward full unity between Catholics and Orthodox was taken when, for the first time in a millennium, a patriarch of Constantinople celebrated the Divine Liturgy in the Byzantine basilica of Ravenna.
John Paul II, at the Vatican, applauded today´s event, which he said helps "encourage us to continue on the road toward full unity between the Christian East and West."
For the first time since the schism of 1054, an Orthodox patriarch of Constantinople celebrated the Divine Liturgy in the Basilica of Sant´Apollinare in Classe in the northern Italian city. The mosaics embellishing the walls of the sixth-century structure are considered some of the greatest expressions of Byzantine art.
In his homily, Patriarch Bartholomew I expressed his hope that the event would be a harbinger of better relations between Catholics and Orthodox.
He didn´t hide the difficulties felt in theological dialogue, but he urged confidence in God, who desires unity among all his children.
"Affirming the truth, we also dialogue in love, we pray and we hope for the magnificent day, blessed by God, in which spiritual communion between the Churches will be restored," said the Orthodox leader.
Ravenna has been a stopover for a cruiser that has been sailing the Adriatic Sea since Wednesday, as part of an environmental-protection initiative of the patriarch.
Aboard are religious leaders, including Cardinals Walter Kasper, president of the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity, and Roger Etchegaray, president emeritus of the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace, who are reflecting on how to protect the environment, particularly the Adriatic.
On Monday, the cruiser Festos Palace is due to arrive in Venice, where Bartholomew I will sign a declaration on protecting the environment. At the same time, John Paul II will sign at the Vatican. The events will be linked by a television connection.
In his Angelus address at the Vatican, the Pope explained that the signing "is another example of that sharing of intentions, which is the prelude to a renewed and full communion."
"Ravenna and Venice challenge us with their same history, and encourage us to continue on the road toward full unity between the Christian East and West," the Pope said.
Actually, it is the Vicar of Christ that seeks you out. And "stooping" to clear obstacles from a path so that reunification can proceed is an exemplary act. I suppose there are some "Latins" who are quite angry the Pope does not "stand-up" to the Orthodox and tell them where the bear shit in the woods..but, this Pope will do anything to make the reunion happen and, for some, on each side, that is unforgiveable.
For the record, The_Reader_David merely spelled out the differences that remain between the two Churches. These differences may not be ignored for any one person's benefit.
You know, this post was just TOO positive for some. I understand differences exist. Perhaps your arguement is with Patriarch Bartholomew for not slapping the Pope across the face with a rolled-up scroll of complaints and accusations
Ubi Petrus, Ibi Ecclesia. Of course, I follow the Pope to whom Jesus promised "what you bind on Earth will be bound in Heaven..." I do admit that obedience does seem "extreme" in these times.
There is no danger I will repudiate an agreement. You, on the other hand...
Words spoken in anger are often regretted.
There are deep divisions between the Orthodox and Catholic Churches. In many ways, despite the superficial similarities between Orthodoxy and Catholicism, the substantive differences are greater than those between Catholicism and Protestantism.
Would I like to see the churches reunite?
Certainly.
Would I welcome it, if it meant that Orthodoxy made changes antithetical to its creed and traditions?
I am afraid not.
At the same time, I am not going to allow my passions to run away with themselves over this issue, and get involved with bitter debate. I will continue to pray for the leaders of the church, pray that they are granted the wisdom to do what is right, and in my private prayers -- as I am admonished to do as an Orthodox Christian -- pray for the good men and women I know, even those that are not Orthodox.
While some of my Orthodox bretheren may disagree (as is their right), I tend to fear those who are resolutely pursuing the tenets of their religion, with righteousness and humility -- regardless of religion -- much less than those who seek to use their religion as a weapon to gain temporal advantage over others. I think if everyone tried to sway the world to their cause by setting a good example, rather than by overawing the world through force of word or deeds, we would be closer to God's vision. (And, no, even I do not succeed in setting a good example all of the time -- but the world would be better if I did.)
Your charge of hatespeech against Reader David is just PC nonsense.
Reminds me of a story I heard when I was a Baptist. Details may be off, but I think it was Billy Sunday preaching in a big stadium, when from the bleachers, someone yelled,
"Give 'em hell, Billy."
To which the preacher replied,
"I just give them the truth and they think it's hell."
Anything?
Cool - let's make a list:
1. Renounce the title "Vicar of Christ" as a term that while perhaps, useful is previous days, (trying to be charitable here) does damage to the ancient collegiality of the bishops, which is the only hope for true reconciliation.
2. Immediately after that, recant the dogmas of the Immaculate Conception and the Bodily Assumption as previously defined, as an unecessary impediment to the Orthodox.
Then announce that The Bishop of Rome has not ever, nor can he ever make an infallible statement.
That's a start.
Can you get this to the Pope for me?
Yes! Thank you. I pray for those things and also I pray for a pope who will not alienate us as much as this one has.
Well first thing, the Bishop of Rome needs to drop all of those assumed, self-aggrandizing titles.
No, I'm not saying that just to anger you. That's the truth. The Orthodox will never accept the Pope as anything more than one of many equals.
You know, this post was just TOO positive for some.
We know a whitewash when we see one. Again, I'm not attempting to make you angry, but suggesting that we are just around the corner from a reconciliation when the theological differences are exactly as The Reader David stated is blatantly dishonest.
Who can be served by such dishonesty is beyond me!
And this is not said to offend anyone here, but I am just tired of the confusion and misunderstandings, so I hope this helps to stave off a fight, of which I am a *primary* guilty party in many instances, as you noted.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.