Skip to comments.
John Paul II is history's champion saintmaker
USAToday ^
| Oct. 3, 2002
| Cathy Lynn Grossman
Posted on 10/03/2002 9:31:15 AM PDT by patent
Edited on 04/13/2004 1:40:00 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
To: EODGUY
Reminds me of the story of Pius XI, who waved the miracle reguirement on Thomas More. Asked about this, he answered--and this was the 1930s--I want everyone to know what is expected of them in such times.
21
posted on
10/03/2002 6:39:06 PM PDT
by
RobbyS
To: RobbyS
Great example.
22
posted on
10/03/2002 6:53:52 PM PDT
by
EODGUY
To: LadyDoc
The "short tempered" part of the "man" part?
23
posted on
10/03/2002 7:06:39 PM PDT
by
patent
To: patent
OR the "man", not of the "man".
24
posted on
10/03/2002 7:08:26 PM PDT
by
patent
To: WriteOn
I don't quarrel with your point. Of course there were short-tempered saints. St. Jerome is a classic example. But we're talking here of a man who died recently and was well known, not for his sanctity, but for his megalomania and other moral deficiencies. This was not a saint in any sense of our understanding of the word. What is it exactly we're supposed to admire? Can there be any doubt that it is Opus Dei that is scheduled to be honored and not true sanctity? This is disgraceful.
To: ThomasMore
John Paul II has been a failure as pope. He has done much to destroy the Catholic Church by his hostility to tradition and indifference to the deposit of faith. Sorry if that makes me a "nutcase" to you, but the facts speak for themselves.
To: american colleen
JnPaul II has not lived a "blameless" life as you suggest. He is much to blame--for the mess that is the Modernist Church today. No one is more to blame.
To: patent
And I could count on you for mindless support of something obviously wrong and unCatholic. But, hey, the Pope wants this man canonized so canonized he will be--and this ends it for you, regardless of the truth of the situation. Truth has always been pretty much beside the point to this papacy anyway. As for you, it is whatever Rome says it is.
To: Desdemona
Soooo, popes pass out halo's? HHUUUMMMMM.
Becky
To: ThomasMore
There are some matters worth fighting for--such as the Catholic faith. If it is being undermined daily and Catholics are in fact becoming Protestants, then this is an intolerable evil even when condoned by a popular pope. The faithful have no choice but to resist. To you that may sound extreme. To me it is the only way to remain a Catholic. Remember, it is the lukewarm who Scripture says will be vomited-forth. And Dante placed such souls in the vestibule of Hell.
To: All
31
posted on
10/03/2002 10:18:56 PM PDT
by
Dajjal
To: ultima ratio
Do you believe he has performed miracles since his death?
32
posted on
10/04/2002 6:28:35 PM PDT
by
WriteOn
To: WriteOn
Absolutely not. The doctors who examined the medical evidence for a miracle were OPUS DEI doctors. The whole process was bogus.
To: ultima ratio
What you're suggesting is that Opus Dei has corrupted good people to contrive a saint? Is this polemics? Do you truly believe Opus Dei is an evil entity, brainwashing doctors to lie?
34
posted on
10/07/2002 7:54:55 AM PDT
by
WriteOn
To: WriteOn
I have said many times I have no quarrel with Opus Dei. You are mixing apples with oranges. My quarrel is with falsifying the canonization process to canonize a man who was not a true saint.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson