I have posted what I think speaks to the issue. David saying he would go to his son in Heaven. Paul saying that without the knowledge of the law, sin is not imputed. None of you have answered that. Further, I have not claimed that unbelieving children (who can understand) are saved.
You however WOULD. you would also claim that UNBELIEVING BABIES are saved through the monstrosity of infant Baptism. Now, let's examine WHO is saying that babies are absolved??? You think sprinkling them does it. That is a dead work. That is far more dangerous than me thinking that God would have mercy on a newborn who dies. My claim has never been that anyone is born without sin. So the noise you all are making about the fall is falling on deaf ears.
You have NO scripture to give an age of accountability...NONE..That is a Roman tradition you cling to while you acuss us of being Romans..
I have never posted anything about some age of accountability. For one, I would have no way of knowing when a child could be at that stage. I think that God deals with people as individuals, not as some across the board "ok, age 7, you are going to Hell if you die now and I didn't choose you."
I don't cling to ANY Roman traditions, including the dead work of infant baptism. You however do.
Jael you say you have NO doctrine only scripture..so show us the CLEAR scripture that all infants and children are saved
I never said all infants and children are saved. My Bible study leads me to believe that where there is no nowledge of Law, or right and wrong, sin is not imputed. See the various verses I have already posted re that.
As OP pointed out the Holy Spirit can quicken an infant ion the womb if He chooses..and we do have scripture for that
Scripture for what? More Scripture that you will ignore like Jesus saying HE WILL draw ALL men to him? And more that you will ignore like God saying that he will take vengeance upon those who disobey the Gospel? More you will ignore like God saying that the election is DUE TO FOREKNOWLEDGE???
More, like in Titus 2:11 For the grace of God that bringeth salvation hath appeared to all men?
While you people still follow in the footsteps of Rome, baptizing babies, and not following the Lord in Believers baptism, the Body of Christ continues unvanquished.
You have posted nothing BUT what you ~think~ and that proves nothing ..the child of David was elect ...so that means nothing. It is not a general statment of promise to infants..
I have never posted anything about some age of accountability. For one, I would have no way of knowing when a child could be at that stage. I think that God deals with people as individuals, not as some across the board "ok, age 7, you are going to Hell if you die now and I didn't choose you." I don't cling to ANY Roman traditions, including the dead work of infant baptism. You however do.
here is the problem Jael..If you say ALL infants are saved you have to have a cut off..when does a child STOP being a saved infant and become responsible? 2 or 4 or 6
On one day are they saved and the next damed if they die?
Jael you ignore scripture I do not . Calling me a Romanist may make you feel better but it does not answer my question to you
Was the cross a crap shoot (by the way you man choosing Christ is a Romnaist position..but I will not call you a Romanist:>)