Posted on 05/22/2005 1:03:03 AM PDT by snippy_about_it
|
are acknowledged, affirmed and commemorated.
|
Our Mission: The FReeper Foxhole is dedicated to Veterans of our Nation's military forces and to others who are affected in their relationships with Veterans. In the FReeper Foxhole, Veterans or their family members should feel free to address their specific circumstances or whatever issues concern them in an atmosphere of peace, understanding, brotherhood and support. The FReeper Foxhole hopes to share with it's readers an open forum where we can learn about and discuss military history, military news and other topics of concern or interest to our readers be they Veteran's, Current Duty or anyone interested in what we have to offer. If the Foxhole makes someone appreciate, even a little, what others have sacrificed for us, then it has accomplished one of it's missions. We hope the Foxhole in some small way helps us to remember and honor those who came before us.
|
I see your point about imagination being "unavoidably delicious". Clearly nobody can subscribe to a monolithic scheme of causation. When asked outright, "who won the war", Shelby Foote's response, "I can tell you who lost." He further stated that it was the robber barons of late in the century who "won". What was gained that could not have been gained without a war. Truly on the face of it the North won. But at what price? I digress.
I guess I asked the question regarding a "Forrest Presidency" because while Forrest might have been brilliant in allocating resources and strategies against a preponderance in men and economic industry of the North, the South never had the transportation system that could evolve a command or logistical system adequate to do the job.
Politically, the South was so distracted unto desperation by internal strife that there was never any wisdom from a congress or even public virtue among the people.
I begin to understand why Lee saw that the full and total annihilation of the Army of the Potomac could "possibly" bring a negotiation for peace and then perhaps a more willing Europe could have intervened.
I think we all would agree that a N.B. Forrest never relied on "laws of successful" war. He never worked things out by rule. I have yet to read anywhere (so please correct me if I'm wrong) his quoting a Napoleon or Frederick. While others worked out problems of an ideal character on a blackboard, Forrest "split in two and charged both ways". It helps when you're a natural genius. He was born to be a soldier.
Uhhh . . . mam'. . . you're talkin to a Texan and a LSU boy. I'm quite familiar with the "unforgiving" Southern Summers.
But THANKS anyway MOM! ;^)
I haven't forgotten about your Sis, so I'll be talking to you later about that.
oooh. I like it. I should make it a thread.
LOL. Thanks for checking in. We were starting to wonder. Thought you must be getting loads of overtime. I guess you are, in a way. Enjoy the little one, sounds like fun!
Amen.
Feel free!
Yes, but you're also a man. I find those types often need 'reminding'. ;-)
My great-great-grandfather "Preacher" Samuel did not serve in the Civil War but his two brothers John Nelson and Belteshazzar did, the latter being killed on the North Anna River in Virginia May 25, 1864. Belteshazzar was named after his grandfather and great grandfather, the latter my great to the fifth for whom the DAR erected this monument:
I wouldn't put it on top of your ancestor's monument. I'd just throw it to the coyotes.
BTTT!!!!!!
Inferno recruiter bump!
"I wouldn't put it (Michael Moore's heart) on top of your ancestor's monument. I'd just throw it to the coyotes"
Ditto! Putting it on the monument would desecrate an honorable man's memorial.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.