Cost = our diginity.
That expensive enough?
Just tell me how screwing a guy in the butt is normal? This Country is getting messed up fast.
OK. The homosexuals are selling this as a civil rights issue. If you want to see what they intend, simply look at the black civil rights movement.
No. I don’t equate perverts with blacks. What I’m saying is, look at the black civil rights movement and expect homosexuals to try to enact similar policies: affirmative action, hiring quotas, preferential government contracting, federal legislation banning discrimination against homosexuality, hate crime laws, diversity education, etc.
lol and dont forget the quota promotions..
Consider the 2 following scenarios... if you believe that being gay is something people are born with, that they have no choice in the matter, then you can add that to the list of other such in-born conditions that the military considers to render someone unfit to serve.
On the other hand, if you believe that being gay is simply a choice in conduct, then guess what? The military, as we know, already disallows all sorts of conduct, even if it is consensual.
With these 2 conditions in mind, I'd like to see the evidence provided by the advocates of this policy change that our military would be more effective at what it does with the policy change in place. If it could be show, credibly and irrefutably, that the military becomes more effective at its function with gays serving openly, then by all means study the policy change. Otherwise, reject it. The last thing we need is a military that is less effective.
This article leaves no room for wishy-washy wiggling on the part of mythical Blue Dogs. Why do we even keep pretending that Blue Dogs exist? They won’t stand for anything, much less actually FIGHT for what’s right! They need to be fired for uselessness, and replaced with principled men and women who will FIGHT for conservative values.
Pantano leaves NO DOUBT what he’s fighting for.