New Hampshire Supreme Court: Gay Sex Not Adultery (Dumbing down deviancy!)

Wnne31, The Associated Press. ^ | November 7, 2003 | AP

[carlo3b]

 
Supreme Court: Gay Sex Not Adultery

Decision Comes In Divorce Appeal

POSTED: 11:55 a.m. EST November 7, 2003
CONCORD, N.H. -- If a married woman has sex with another woman, is that adultery? The New Hampshire Supreme Court says no.

The court was asked to review a divorce case in which a husband accused his wife of adultery after she had a sexual relationship with another woman. Any finding that one spouse is at fault in the break-up of a marriage can change how the court divides the couple's property.

Robin Mayer, of Brownsville, Vt., was named in the divorce proceedings of a Hanover couple. She appealed the case to the Supreme Court, arguing that gay sex doesn't qualify as adultery under the state's divorce law.

In a 3-2 ruling Friday, the court agreed.

The majority determined that the definition of adultery requires sexual intercourse. The judges who disagreed said adultery should be defined more broadly to include other extramarital sexual activity.

[carlo3b]

Interesting homepage Carlo, but is it 'NORMAL'? Or is it trolling?

Trolling? I am sitting here wondering what in the hell you are talking about.. What in the HELL are you talking about? The fact that I am a Chef that does TV and Films? Do you think my position on Gays is enhancing my career? FOOL, it has done just the opposite! Bwhahhahahhhaahhah

My position on this issue has probably cost me my future in this industry..so be it! I stand on principles, what have you given up for liberty lately. I am also a single dad, that has 5 kids and grandchildren that have to grow up in this dump that these, and maybe even you want them to live in..  JERK

What it should tell you is that I have seen this life choice destroy brilliant young and beautiful lives and crush families and loved ones. Get lost phony!

[EdReform]

The Importance of Morality and Religion in Government

Conservativism and Morality (Cathryn Crawford)

[carlo3b]

WORTH THE READING.. thanks

[tpaine]

I've been a TV chef for 13 years and have appeared in far too many commercials to recall them all. I've lectured and performed aboard cruise ships as a featured Chef. I've appeared in 5 feature films, one quite recently, BELLADONNA. I have a deep distinctive voice, so voice-overs have been plentiful. I'm Italian of course. I have a strong personality, but am naturally funny (except to my ex-wives). GULP! I retired a few years ago to raise my kids. In the last divorce, I got the kids, she the assets, sooo . . . DRUM ROLL . . . I'm back . . . and ready for that special role. Carlo


Trolling? I am sitting here wondering what in the hell you are talking about..
-carlo-

---

Funny, I'm sitting here wondering what in the hell ~you~ are ranting about here at FR ..
- Its pretty obvious what you're up to on your home page.

[carlo3b]

WHAT IN THE HELL ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? Speak up, what are you saying..TROLLING.. For what?

[tpaine]

DRUM ROLL . . . I'm back . . . and ready for that special role. Carlo

[carlo3b]

You are a friggin TROLL.. Spit it out coward, what are you trying to say?.. You freak.. don't be afraid, everyone knows your an idiot already, you have nothing to lose! LOL

[carlo3b]

{{{{CRICKETS}}}}

[ppaul]

RE: #135

Huh?
What's are you trying to say?
Is that related to the article somehow?
I don't get it.
Can you fill us in?

[carlo3b]

This troll has only his name in common with Thomas Paine.. all he is a PAINE in the ASS.. That and perhaps his Faux Libertarian front.. Calling me a Troll indeed, what a coward, hit and run! Blah Blah Blah Morec JSpringer than TPaine.. LOL

[tpaine]

I said it, at 144. Read it again - and feel free to rant on.

[ppaul]

- Its pretty obvious what you're up to on your home page.

Hey, maybe I'm just slow.
But what's he up to?

[carlo3b]

I said it, at 144. Read it again - and feel free to rant on.

Let me get this straight  ...a.. you cut and pasted my Portfolio page, and .....???? . . You really have be curious now, what kind of weird conspiracy did you conjure up in that Tinfoil beanie of yours???

Paul, can you see it, help me clear this up..
 

[pchuck]

You are correct. I just read the opinion and the NH Supreme Court was merely interpreting the statute. The statutory definition of adultery is far too narrow. You are correct, the NH Supreme Court was not being activist. The NH Legislature should simply amend the statute, toot-sweet.

[carlo3b]

  {{{{CRICKETS}}}}

[ppaul]

Paul, can you see it, help me clear this up?

Nope.
I'm clueless.

[carlo3b]

If he wakes up with a better story, ping me Big Boy..later. . LOL

[tpaine]

My first post to you replied to your hypocrisy at 134 about being NORMAL..

You consider your home page trolling normal, -- I don't. -- End of story.

[carlo3b]

Thats it.. I'm not allowed to be in the entertainment/hospitality industry and complain about the injustice within the judiciary? WELL, JUST DAMN.. OK, end of story!  sheesh
 

[tpaine]

carlo3b wrote:
Thats it.. I'm not allowed ---

---

Feel free to rant on.
And rest assured others will feel free point out your hypocricies.