[liberallarry]

If you really think the IPCC scientists are lying, you're a fool.

You exagerate. You cannot find a couple of thousand of the world's best climate scientists who oppose the findings of the IPCC. There are a few...notably one from MIT whose work is reviewed in this month's Scientific American.

Once again, disagreement is normal in the scientific world. Proof cannot be absolute. Anyone who uses a political filter, as you are doing, to try to decide which scientific theories best fit the facts, is a fool.

[dasboot]

The only abnormality in climate is zero change. Stasis is unnatural. DUH!

[_Jim]

You would THINK that after the so-called spectre of 'Global Warming' appeared OVER TEN YEARS AGO that a more certain determination COULD HAVE BEEN MADE by now, but no, it hasn't been.

Despite all the SCREAMING by the looney left, simply hounding an agenda won't make it come true.

And when it comes to *increased* levels of Carbon Dioxide in the atmosphere - can you explain why if it's DUE to the burning so-called "fossil fuels" (a giant misnomer, for a substantial part of the make-up of the Earth is carbon or carbon compounds!) -

- why hasn't the level of Oxygen in the atmosphere decreased? (That's what concerns ME.)

Is all this 'global warming' stuff just bunk?

Yes.

[Joe_October]

Uh, would 17,000 scientists who disagree be enough for you Larry?

Try http://www.oism.org/pproject/.

I know this won't convince you but for people who have not made up their mind yet, here are real people who disagree with politicians and others who feel guilty about something that has nothing to do with science.