Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Czechs Confirm Iraqi Agent Met With Terror Ringleader
New York Times ^ | Saturday, October 27, 2001 | By PATRICK E. TYLER with JOHN TAGLIABUE

Posted on 10/26/2001 8:28:46 PM PDT by JohnHuang2

October 27, 2001

Czechs Confirm Iraqi Agent Met With Terror Ringleader

By PATRICK E. TYLER with JOHN TAGLIABUE

WASHINGTON, Oct. 26 — The Interior Minister of the Czech Republic said today that an Iraqi intelligence officer met with Mohammed Atta, one of the ringleaders of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks on the United States, just five months before the synchronized hijackings and mass killings were carried out.

The official confirmation of the meeting, the details of which remain a mystery, does not amount to proof of Iraqi involvement in the attacks.

But after weeks of speculation and conflicting reports about Iraqi contacts with a cell leader who plotted the terror assault, today's confirmation raises fresh questions about whether Iraq's foreign-intelligence arm in recent years established secret ties with Al Qaeda, the terrorist organization of Osama bin Laden.

Federal law enforcement officials say the Prague meeting fits into Mr. Atta's itinerary this way: on April 4 he was in Virginia Beach. He flew to the Czech Republic on April 8 and met with the Iraqi intelligence officer, who was identified as Ahmed Khalil Ibrahim Samir al-Ani. By April 11, Mr. Atta was back in Florida renting a car.

A senior administration official tonight indicated that the Czech decision to go public with the information about the meeting took Washington by surprise.

As for the meeting itself, the official said, "We are not sure we know exactly the full meaning of this, but we have known about it for some time." He said the administration would pursue the investigation "wherever it leads" and "we are relying on the intelligence agencies, investigators and law-enforcement officials around the world to help us."

The public linkage of Iraq's intelligence service and the Al Qaeda terrorists also raises the issue of whether those ties suggest Iraqi complicity — either through financing, training or provision of forged travel documents — in the terrorist attacks on the United States that cost thousands of lives and untold billions of dollars in damage to the American economy.

The Czech authorities confirmed the meeting at a time of spirited debate within the Bush administration over whether to extend the anti- terrorism military campaign now underway in Afghanistan to Iraq at some point in the future. Such a widening of the campaign is opposed by Arab states and European allies already nervous that the American campaign is being perceived as a Western assault on Muslims, despite repeated assurances that the target is not Islam but terrorism.

Speaking at a news conference in Prague, the Czech Interior minister, Stanislav Gross, said that Mr. Atta met Mr. Ani, an Iraqi diplomat identified by Czech authorities as an intelligence officer, in early April of this year.

Mr. Gross and other Czech officials suggested earlier this month that while there was evidence that Mr. Atta had visited Prague, there was none that he had actually met with Iraqi agents. It was unclear what had prompted them to revise their conclusions, although it appeared possible that United States officials, concerned about the political implications of Iraqi involvement in terror attacks, had put pressure on the Czech government earlier this month to keep quiet.

Mr. Atta, who had lived as a student in Hamburg, Germany, was unknown to Western intelligence services at the time, and did not attract the attention of Czech authorities, according to Hynek Kmonicek, then deputy foreign minister and now ambassador to the United Nations.

Mr. Kmonicek on April 20 informed Mr. Ani that he was being expelled from the Czech Republic for activities incompatible with his diplomatic status, a code phrase for espionage.

"It's not a common thing," Mr. Kmonicek said, "for an Iraqi diplomat to meet a student from a neighboring country, though it is still premature to speculate further" on what transpired during the meeting.

Although Mr. Atta had been a student in Hamburg, he had, by April of this year, shifted his operations to the United States, where he and other members of the hijacking teams attended flying schools in Florida and elsewhere, conducted surveillance of airports and financed their preparations with large cash transfers from overseas banks in the United Arab Emirates and elsewhere.

Mr. Ani, the Iraqi intelligence officer, was under surveillance because he had been observed near the Radio Free Europe, Radio Liberty headquarters in Prague, which Czech officials believe has been targeted for anti-American terror attacks and is now heavily guarded.

After the Sept. 11 attacks, Czech officials worked frantically to trace Mr. Atta's movements and his identity was established with airline passenger lists and passport records.

"The Czech confirmation seems to me very important," said R. James Woolsey, former director of central intelligence who has become a strong advocate outside of government for a rigorous investigation of Iraq's possible role in terror against the United States. "It is yet another lead that points toward Iraqi involvement in some sort of terrorism against the United States that ought to be followed up vigorously," he said.

Today's news from Prague fits into a matrix of circumstantial evidence that is emerging on the question of Iraqi support or contact with terrorist groups, but none of it directly connects Saddam Hussein to the events of Sept. 11.

A senior Israeli official said today that the country's intelligence services have not come up with any evidence linking Iraq to the Sept. 11 attacks, or to the anthrax scare in the United States.

"We don't see any evidence of Al Qaeda in Iraq," the official said. "Not as a base, not as financial support." Still, he conceded, proof could emerge. "The only reason they might cooperate is the basic common hate of America and Israel," the official said. "But we don't think he's the bad guy — he's the bad guy, but not for this story."

Still, new information does suggest that Mr. Hussein was actively training terrorists to attack American interests throughout the 1990's.

One example is the testimony of Sabah Khodada, a captain in the Iraqi army who emigrated to Texas in May after working for eight years at what he described as a terrorist training camp at a bend in the Tigris River just southeast of Baghdad.

Mr. Khodada's past was completely unknown to American officials until an Iraqi intelligence officer, who defected to Turkey earlier this year, told his debriefers about the terrorist training camp at Salman Pak and revealed that Mr. Khodada had been an instructor there.

Mr. Khodada was interviewed by the PBS documentary program "Frontline," and he described the camp as a highly secret facility run by an international terrorist known only as "The Ghost" to the staff.

The camp brought non-Iraqi Arabs from Persian Gulf states, including Saudi Arabia, Mr. Khodada said, and gave them training "on assassinations, kidnapping, hijacking of airplanes, hijacking of buses, hijacking of trains, and all other kinds of operations related to terrorism."

Security was tight in the training camp, but Mr. Khodada said that The Ghost and the other trainers who provided instruction to the non- Iraqis talked about operations they were proud of.

"For example," he said, "they were telling us about how they were able to penetrate the American forces during the 1991 Gulf War, where they went inside Saudi Arabian territory, and they were able to bring coordinates, exact coordinates of the Dhahran air base which was hit by Scud missiles and many Americans were killed."

Such an account of Iraqi penetration behind American lines during the Gulf war has not been asserted before, but an Iraqi Scud missile did hit an American barracks on Feb. 25, 1991, killing 28 soldiers and wounding nearly 100.

Mr. Khodada's account has yet to be independently confirmed, but the existence of the terrorist base where he worked was confirmed by United Nations inspectors, who scoured Iraq for secret defense and weapons facilities during much of the 1990's.

Raymond Zalinskas, a member of the United Nations inspection force in 1994, said that during searches for secret biological weapons facilities at Salman Pak, the inspectors learned of an "anti-terrorist" training camp nearby that was in fact a terrorist training camp, according to intelligence reports they read.

"They called it an anti-terrorist training camp, but there was intelligence given to us that they actually were training terrorists there," he said today. One of the prominent features of the camp, he added, was a Boeing 707 that was used to simulate hijackings.

The importance of Mr. Khodada's account is that, if true, it establishes a link between Iraqi intelligence and the training of non-Iraqi Arabs from Persian Gulf states for international terrorist operations. But that is where the linkage ends for the moment, unless other witnesses emerge who can fill out the account.

Mr. Khodada's identity might never have been known were it not for the Iraqi National Congress, an Iraqi opposition group headed by Ahmed Chalabi, a math teacher turned banker who emerged at the end of the Iran-Iraq War to call for the overthrow of Saddam Hussein.

His group was involved in an abortive C.I.A. attempt to build an alliance in northern Iraq to challenge Mr. Hussein's rule. The recriminations over the failure of that effort have left bitter feelings on both sides and in Congress, where Mr. Chalabi continues to garner some support. However, senior officials in the State Department and Central Intelligence Agency view information that comes from the group with skepticism.

In the case of Mr. Khodada, American officials appear to have concluded that since he cannot provide hard evidence that the terrorist training he observed resulted in specific acts of terror, his information is of limited use. Still, a significant group of senior administration officials, nominally led by Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul D. Wolfowitz, continue to push the investigation into Iraq's possible involvement.

One of the figures they have focused on is Faruk al-Hijazi, Iraq's ambassador to Turkey, who is also known as the former chief of Iraq's intelligence service.

One of the most persistent assertions, again arising from information provided by Mr. Chalabi's Iraqi National Congress, is that Mr. Hijazi was dispatched by Mr. Hussein in 1998 to meet with Osama bin Laden and offer him and his Al Qaeda allies safe haven in Iraq.

Mr. Hussein was said to be so impressed with Al Qaeda's bombing strikes on U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania that he wanted to take control of the group's operations to serve Iraqi interests.

Turkish intelligence officials said this week that they have no information that Mr. Hijazi traveled to Afghanistan or anywhere else to meet with Mr. bin Laden.

Still, Mr. Hijazi's connection to Iraq's secret service, notorious for internal repression and overseas assassinations, has caused embarrassment for Turkey and Mr. Hijazi raced home to Baghdad on Sept. 24 after reports in the United States, still unconfirmed, asserted that he had met with Mr. bin Laden in 1998.

Zaben al-Kubaisay, the undersecretary of the Iraqi Embassy, said today from Ankara that Mr. Hijazi returned to Turkey this week, but he was unable to speak to the press due to his heavy workload.

Bush administration officials seem at a loss to say how they will react if a smoking gun on Iraqi terrorism against the United States emerges, something that Mr. Wolfowitz at the Pentagon has warned the administration to prepare for.

Mr. Woolsey, a member of the Defense Policy Board that advises Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld, says the answer is simple: "It is perfectly reasonable for the administration to focus first and foremost on the Taliban while gathering information about other possible states involved."

If such information proves such involvement, he added, the administration should, after careful consideration, take action, including military action against Baghdad.

Another member of the Defense Policy Board and a former defense secretary and CIA chief, James R. Schlesinger, is more circumspect.

"We should be cautious before taking action against Iraq which might destabilize one of the more moderate Arab regimes, but more importantly, such action must be successful, or it should be avoided for the time being," he said. "Therefore any presidential decision on Iraq must be carefully weighed on the basis of sound intelligence and political information."

For Education And Discussion Only. Not For Commercial Use.



TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 10/26/2001 8:28:46 PM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
now the liberal media is saying that the anthrax is probably domestic.
2 posted on 10/26/2001 8:33:51 PM PDT by ken21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Since a repeat of the Gulf War is impossible, given that no Gulf nation will allow us to stage out the only option that could have significant results is the nuclear. This will only happen if we find not only the smoking gun, but a videoof Hussein loading, aiming, and firing it.

As that is unlikely to occur then I agree one public war at a time. If some group wishes to plan a Husseini accident I won't shed any tears, but destroy the Taliban and Al Queda first. bin Laden, even without state resources is a much more dangerous foe than Hussein as he has nothing to lose and Paradise to gain.

3 posted on 10/26/2001 8:40:12 PM PDT by xkaydet65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
The thing about an operation in Iraq is that we already have a real government in exile in the Iraqi National Congress. This means that, unlike Afghanistan, Iraq can be crushed whenever we're ready.

Saddam delenda est.

4 posted on 10/26/2001 8:55:29 PM PDT by denydenydeny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: JohnHuang2
"We should be cautious before taking action against Iraq which might destabilize one of the more moderate Arab regimes, but more importantly, such action must be successful, or it should be avoided for the time being," he said. "Therefore any presidential decision on Iraq must be carefully weighed on the basis of sound intelligence and political information."

Hence the misinformation out there on the 'most likely sources' for the anthrax. Rather than say they don't know, they keep hinting at 'domestic.' We're not ready, IOW.

6 posted on 10/26/2001 8:57:53 PM PDT by piasa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
This is all starting to remind me of the senate impeachment "trial".
The senators didn't WANT to see the evidence against cllinton, because then they'd HAVE to do something about him.
The way the administration is acting about this, it seems that they aren't ready to deal with Saddam.....YET. ;)
7 posted on 10/26/2001 9:02:57 PM PDT by MamaLucci
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson