very interesting article. it is thinking like this that will break the stranglehold OPEC has on us. now we need to get the federal gov't on board. everyone needs to email their congressman and let them know.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
To: earlybirdnj
Paragraphs are our friends.
2 posted on
10/29/2001 5:50:44 PM PST by
MistrX
To: earlybirdnj
But..what was up with that exploding blimp?
3 posted on
10/29/2001 5:52:01 PM PST by
hove
To: earlybirdnj
How do we invest?
To: earlybirdnj
Unreadable and, so, not read.
There's an HTML course that teaches things like paragraphs available on the FR home page.
5 posted on
10/29/2001 5:55:15 PM PST by
sinkspur
To: earlybirdnj
The lightweight gas, the most abundant element in the universe This is factually wrong. The most abundant element in the universe is Stupidity, which is why there hasn't been more of an effort on ending the Arab energy-stranglehold. Hydrogen is a close second.
6 posted on
10/29/2001 5:56:04 PM PST by
Cachelot
To: earlybirdnj
Your unformatted post gave me (methane) gas.
7 posted on
10/29/2001 5:56:22 PM PST by
TADSLOS
To: earlybirdnj
In 1970, I saw a glass sphere of crude oil in a Boston museum - captioned that all crude oil would be exhausted in 25 years. "In 25 years" was six years ago. Anyone now unable to drive due to a lack of gasoline refined from crude oil?
To: earlybirdnj
Interesting but will hydrogen cells provide enough energy to FORMAT ARTICLES?
9 posted on
10/29/2001 5:57:02 PM PST by
PJ-Comix
To: earlybirdnj
You need to learn how to paragraph, because this is basically unreadable as it stands.
The problem I see with a "hydrogen economy" is that you need energy to produce the Hydrogen--let's say by electrolyzing water. At the moment, most electrical energy comes from fossile fuels. So you aren't really saving any oil unless you start making electricity in some other way, lets say from nuclear power.
10 posted on
10/29/2001 5:57:20 PM PST by
Cicero
To: earlybirdnj
Kind hint: learn HTML.
The early line is from the black goo boys is that you still need "hydrocarbons" to get the hydrogen, which is partially true. But the hydrocarbon to be used is natural gas. Which, I note, Canada and Mexico have a lot of. Also, the central asian state's hydrocarbon resources is predominately natural gas over oil, as opposed to the Persian Gulf. I'd really like to see the central asian states and Russia benefit from this...I'd rather give them my money. Maybe all the deals with Putin et al. anticipate this???
The hydrogen can come from water by electrolysis too. The black goo critics say it's not cost effective, but that turns untrue when one uses electricity from dams, et al., that would otherwise go to waste during off-peak hours.
Also hydrogen is clean. Oil costs supplied by the industry never take into account the externalized costs of air and water pollution. And the cost of relying upon countries we should not be underwriting.
11 posted on
10/29/2001 5:58:08 PM PST by
Shermy
To: earlybirdnj
Good news.
To: earlybirdnj
Its a shame a person smart enough to appreciate an article like this, isn't smart enough to learn how to format it.
To: earlybirdnj
The article suggests people will be able to pour water into the fuel tank and zoom away happy as a clam. In fact, it takes tremendous energy to extract hydrogen from H2O. And that energy comes from where class? Currently, fossil fuels. All current Hydrogen cells, if I'm not mistaken, also run on, ta-da, petroleum products i.e., propane, gasoline, diesel fuel.
Of course, if I could read the entire unformatted article, I may have found the author answered this issue, but I doubt it.
I'm all for alternate energy. Sadly, most of it is hype, hype, hype.
17 posted on
10/29/2001 6:03:30 PM PST by
Grim
To: earlybirdnj
Well formatted
To: earlybirdnj
My eyes are bleeding.
To: earlybirdnj
1. I'm suing you for headaches related to squinting at unformatted paragraphs! My lawyer will be contacting you via e-mail
2. I can't think of a better technology that could render the arabs irelevant and impotent!
To: earlybirdnj
Not only did you fail to insert paragraph marks, you did not provide a proper URL to the article so that someone else can go there, recopy it, and put in the paragraphs for our reading pleasure! Two sins in one post: 3 strikes and you're out!
Seriously, if you would just insert the paragraphs, I'd love to read your most interesting article. Until then, I cannot be bothered.
And to your "Thank you", I reply: "You are most welcome. I'm happy to share what I have learned on FreeRepublic."
To: earlybirdnj
I like your article very much. If all our homes were covered with solar cells spliting hydrogen from water through electrolysis we could cause the Sheicks heartburn. The idea has tremendous merit. Most of us have coverings for our homes anyway so the cost may be cost effective NOW. cdcook@scottsboro,org
To: earlybirdnj
"Oh the humanity!"Here's why hydrogen will be a hard sell to the public:
28 posted on
10/29/2001 6:18:19 PM PST by
Jay W
To: earlybirdnj
It was the longest damn paragraph I ever read!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson