Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gun Group Says Second Amendment Foe Exploiting Tragedy
C N S News ^ | 30 October | Jeff Johnson

Posted on 10/31/2001 12:15:23 AM PST by 1Peter2:16

Capitol Hill (CNSNews.com) - A gun rights group says an anti-gun congressman is using the Sept.11 terrorist attacks on the United States as an excuse to further his unconstitutional agenda.

Rep. Rod Blagojevich (D-Ill.) said in a press conference Sunday, Oct. 21, that .50 caliber sniper rifles are the "terrorist weapon of choice," and civilian ownership of the weapons should, therefore, be banned.

"This is a weapon that should never have been allowed for civilian use in the first place," Blagojevich said. "In response to these terrorist tragedies, we have to get them off the market."

Erich Pratt, communications director for Gun Owners of America, calls the connection "completely ludicrous," and says Blagojevich is "trying to use the tragedy as a launching point."

"First of all, there were no guns used in the September 11 attacks," Pratt said. "Secondly, the fact that there were no guns on board is what assured the terrorists that they could come on board with just box cutters and plastic knives and hold a whole planeload of people in terror. This is the fruit of gun control."

During the trial of the suspects in the 1998 embassy bombings in Africa, a U.S. operative for the al-Qaeda terrorist network claimed to have shipped 25 Barrett .50 (caliber) sniper rifles to Afghanistan in the late 1980s, according to a report by the Violence Policy Center (VPC), an anti-gun rights group.

Blagojevich points to this report in support of his position.

"There is no one in the firearms industry who is able to sell at their own free will to foreign nationals or foreign governments," according to Ronnie Barrett, creator of the Barrett .50 caliber sniper rifle.

"The laws are so strict and the punishments are so high, you wouldn't see any of our people risking their future doing the type of foolishness that the Violence Policy Center is lying about," Barrett said.

The report omits that the weapons were given to what is now known as al-Qaeda, as part of a $50 million military supply and equipment package from the U.S. government to help Afghanistan fight off the Soviet invasion underway at the time. The package included small arms and ammunition, as well as Stinger anti-aircraft missiles.

Barrett is upset by the claims made by VPC and the inferences made by Blagojevich, but not just because they have hurt his reputation.

"This is actual sabotage of the American defense industry. We currently are in overdrive production of meeting some of the U.S. defense requirements and needs," he said. "Here at probably the busiest we could be, the Violence Policy Center, Henry Waxman, and Rod Blagojevich sabotage our operation with these accusations."

Barrett says some of the company's sub-contractors had refused to do business with them as a result of the report, until the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms stepped in and assured the suppliers that Barrett Firearms Manufacturing had indeed broken no laws.

VPC and Blagojevich are spreading "disinformation" about his product, according to Barrett, because similar tactics have worked for gun restriction and confiscation supporters in the past.

"This tactic has been used so well in the past on the recent 'assault weapons' bill, and things like that, that they believe that it will continue to work," he concluded.

Anti-Second Amendment forces began referring to semi-automatic rifles with "military looking" cosmetic features as "assault rifles" during the Clinton administration. The tactic confused many hunting, sporting, and self-defense long-guns with true assault rifles, which are fully-automatic "machine guns," not semi-automatic rifles.

Pratt says he's not surprised to see Blagojevich employing the tactic.

"If there's an anti-gun bill in Congress, you will find, usually, his name on it," Pratt said.

But a spokeswoman for Blagojevich says the congressman only believes the weapons should be regulated in the same manner as machine guns are regulated by the National Firearms Act. That law requires the payment of a tax to the federal government for the purchase or transfer of a fully-automatic weapon.

It also requires the buyer to undergo a background investigation by federal officials. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms keeps a registry of all machine gun owners.

During the Clinton administration, the Democratically-controlled Congress used the precedent established by the National Firearms Act to ban the manufacture of new fully automatic weapons for private use.

"This is a nibbling process against the Second Amendment," Barrett says, "of reclassifying smaller types of weapons, demonizing

them, and then trying to get some types of laws or regulations passed against them." "Make no mistake, this is not just about .50 caliber [guns], because [of] the discussions they're having are talking about .50 caliber and 'other powerful weapons,'" Barrett said. "Other powerful weapons are gonna be basically every center-fire rifle cartridge by their definition."


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 10/31/2001 12:15:23 AM PST by 1Peter2:16
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 1Peter2:16
Let him rant on so people will know him to be mad. In fact encourage it. Let him bury himself.
2 posted on 10/31/2001 12:19:48 AM PST by MedicalMess
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Peter2:16
During the Clinton administration, the Democratically-controlled Congress used the precedent established by the National Firearms Act to ban the manufacture of new fully automatic weapons for private use.

The machine gun freeze was actually part of FOPA 1986, during Reagan's administration. Maybe he means the Feinstein ban on certain "military-looking" semi-automatics that passed in 1994.

-ccm

3 posted on 10/31/2001 2:21:58 AM PST by ccmay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Peter2:16
It's encouraging to know that most Americans see the value of being armed as a preventative measure against terrorism. The downside is that we're so eager to pass 'protective' laws that may include gun control measures.

There's nothing in the homeland defense package about gun control, right?

4 posted on 10/31/2001 2:27:27 AM PST by ovrtaxt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Peter2:16
Gun Group Says Second Amendment Foe Exploiting Tragedy

To call Blagojevich a foe of the second amendment is to sell him short. Not only is he a foe of the Second Amendment, he is an enemy of freedom, a facilitator of genocide, and a tyrant in waiting. He is the sort of filth who takes his cues from examples of Goebbels and Goering with their repetitive lies about Jews. It is Blagojevich's misfortune that he was born 50 years too late and in the wrong country.

5 posted on 10/31/2001 2:34:27 AM PST by from occupied ga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Peter2:16
Rep. Rod Blagojevich (D-Ill.) said in a press conference Sunday, Oct. 21, that .50 caliber sniper rifles are the "terrorist weapon of choice," and civilian ownership of the weapons should, therefore, be banned

Listen to the wise man...if the .50 caliber had been banned, 9/11 would never have happened.

/sarcasm

6 posted on 10/31/2001 2:39:45 AM PST by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MedicalMess
"Let him rant on so people will know him to be mad."

"Let him rave on so people will know him to be mad." --Pharaoh Rameses , The Ten Commandments

One of my favorite movies.

Moses: "Cities are made of bricks. The strong make many, the weak make few. The dead make none."

7 posted on 10/31/2001 2:50:20 AM PST by RandallFlagg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: *bang_list
bang
8 posted on 10/31/2001 4:23:33 AM PST by Fixit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fixit
How different is Blagojevich's lies to achieve fear different than that of the Al Queda's campaign of fear.
9 posted on 10/31/2001 5:34:38 AM PST by School of Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 1Peter2:16
This is a weapon that should never have been allowed for civilian use in the first place

I'm sure that the indian that Billy Dixon killed at the battle of Adobe Walls with his Sharps .50 at a distance of about a mile would also agree...
10 posted on 10/31/2001 5:40:39 AM PST by Frumious Bandersnatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson