Posted on 11/01/2001 6:03:28 AM PST by Eala
Edited on 07/12/2004 3:35:48 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
Tucked quietly into the counterterrorism package that President Bush signed into law last week is a measure that could require foreigners to use identification cards to enter the United States.
A spokesman for Sen. Christopher S. Bond, Missouri Republican, confirmed yesterday that his ID-card proposal was included in the legislation at the last minute before the House and Senate gave final approval to the overall bill.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
Ultra tolerance is killing us as a nation.
Good. Those who are freaked out about a "national id card" also have:
Drivers Licenses,
Social Security Cards,
Hunting Licenses,
Employee ID Cards,
Vehicle Registration Papers,
Insurance Cards in their vehicles, and
Credit Cards.
Having a card to verify one is truly a citizen without warrants against him/her is just one more thin piece of plastic to carry. Go for it.
These statist elite are having the best time of their political lives with phony laws and regulations that:
In the meantime, the President continues to sneak the klintoon's final burst of marxist regulations into place.
Does anybody remember how we (at FR) exulted in the nomination and appointment of an Attorney General who claimed he was an avowed supporter of the former Constitution? HAH!
I'm going to kill this twisted piece of non-logic once and for all.
1. If the national ID won't do anything that all those cards already do, what would be its purpose? Wouldn't it be redundant?
2. Each and every one of those cards, even the SS card, is voluntary. The national ID wouldn't be.
3. Not one of the cards you mentioned carries biometric data such as fingerprints and retina scans.
Ya ever consider doing a SEARCH before you post? A search for "id-card" shows this same article posted almost exactly SEVEN hours before your post.
Pardon me while I go over there to make futher comments.
1. If the national ID won't do anything that all those cards already do, what would be its purpose? Wouldn't it be redundant?
2. Each and every one of those cards, even the SS card, is voluntary. The national ID wouldn't be.
3. Not one of the cards you mentioned carries biometric data such as fingerprints and retina scans.
Still breathin'. Now, to your queries. :) To wit:
1. I never said a national id card would do "anything" all the other cards did. Rather, my point was that there are similar state-sponsored, nearly universal cards. I'm betting 99.99999% of Americans don't resist these. Rather, they want them. So it wouldn't be redundant. Of course, if there were a way to ENCODE current cards with national id info, then that would be an economical way of handling it.
2. In reality, these cards aren't really voluntary, are they? You might SAY Social Security cards are voluntary, but truthfully, IN PRACTICE, they aren't. I remember when my child was born, he needed a social security number before he left the hospital. Auto insurance is required if you own a vehicle in many states. Voluntary, yes...if you own a vehicle, it isn't.
3. You are correct. Hence the need for a national id card. Then law breakers and suspects can be id'd if need be. Of course law breakers and suspects will not carry a card, but if we have a database of bad guy's retina scans, how easy it would be to keep one from boarding a plane.
I doubt the national id card will happen, primarily because of concerns like yours. I just don't share those concerns. :) Rest easy, friend.
---max
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.