Skip to comments.
Bush Team Rejects U.N. Plan to Condemn Anthrax Attacks
NY Times ^
| 31 Oct 2001
| ELAINE SCIOLINO
Posted on 11/01/2001 9:55:12 AM PST by white trash redneck
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
To: Shermy
What's VWRC?
Okay, you made me laugh there.
When the news about Clinton getting Lewinskys broke in the media, Hillary went on one of the morning television shows and said the whole story was nothing but a Vast Right Wing Conspiracy, a group of horrible conservative persons who were out to get them because they were from Arkansas.
BTW, FreeRepublic is the center of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy. And a lot of the Battle for Florida a year ago was run from FR. I guess someone should have told you before you enlistd in the VRWC, soldier.
; )
To: lady lawyer
The administration did exactly the right thing, whatever phraseology they used to sell their position to the left wing nuts running Europe. "Whatever phraseology" does not include giving them more ammunition against American right wing nuts. They've dined out on Tim McVeigh for years as poster boy for American right-wing nuttiness. I wouldn't feed that propaganda monster without firm proof that we ourselves are guilty.
Why not say "thank you, no" without smearing our own people?
To: MJY1288
Another instance where I read one of your posts and think "Exactly what I was thinking!!!"
23
posted on
11/01/2001 10:35:35 AM PST
by
lawgirl
To: Dog Gone
If we find out it is from Iraq, we will deal with it, the U.N. has no jurisdiction in our affairs. They can have a meeting and draw up all the resolutions they want, but since we are not good enough to be on the Human Rights commission we don't need them to worry about our problems here.
24
posted on
11/01/2001 10:38:34 AM PST
by
MJY1288
To: johnny7
An NY POST article today quotes administration sources talking about a left-wing pagan wicca group from Indianapolis.
To: white trash redneck
"Let's assume this was the work of a bunch of right-wing nuts or a Unabomber kind of thing," the official said. "That would make it a domestic criminal matter. The Security Council just has no legitimate role in this."What the hell is wrong with this guy? All evidence points towards Islamic nuts, none towards right-wing nuts. Maybe we should assume this official is sending these letters? It makes about as much since? I think we have some people in the FBI and CIA who are left over from the Clintonista regime. They need a domestic threat so that they can scare congress into passing laws that allow them to keep an eye on us citizens. Time for Bush to clean house in both agencies. We have a real enemy, and it is not us.
26
posted on
11/01/2001 10:43:39 AM PST
by
monday
To: The Old Hoosier
Now wait a minute, how can you say the wican group is left wing? By the time Hillary, the liberal presss and others get through with this, I am sure all reasonable Americans will understand that this was a right wing group of witches (discussed near Halloween, wink, wink) and that even though the article indicates similarity of letters sent to O'Reily, it really must have been by a right wing group who didn't think Bill was hard enough on the left wingers. (/sarcasm)
Seriously, I read the article and thought this was the work of a left wing group, but I am sure liberals read it and thought it obviously was the work of a right wing group.
To: Slim Pickens
I don't think VRWC folks would mailscud Ashcroft, Whitehouse, Supreme Court mail. Daschle maybe.
To: lady lawyer
I agree with your point, but I suspect the Bushies may have done the right thing for the wrong reason. Instead of this drivel about domestic right wing extremists, they should have (im)politely told the UN to butt out.
To: white trash redneck
What I can't figure out is why the national media haven't picked up on the New Jersey story about the two Arab men being questioned by the INS in connection with the anthrax letters. The unnamed "official" doesn't even seem to be aware of it or - at any rate - to take it seriously.
To: epluribus_2
One such VRWC nut bombed the Murrah Federal Building. I'm not sure that all these groups care whether a Pubbie or a Dem is at the helm...
To: one_particular_harbour
Something else is up. Here's what's up. If this turns out to be locals such as right-wing extremists, this is going to be a big backlash worldwide against the US "Americans" killing their own. This is going to be a huge PR disaster. So Bush is minimizing the damage as much as possible by keeping the idea out there that it could really be locals after all.
32
posted on
11/01/2001 11:16:53 AM PST
by
jlogajan
To: jlogajan
So Bush is minimizing the damage as much as possible by keeping the idea out there that it could really be locals after all.That's a clever thought, though it sounds a little too Clintonian for Bush. I hope you're wrong about it being domestic.
To: white trash redneck
I hope you're wrong about it being domestic. Well, I certainly don't want it to be locals either. But what can ya do?
34
posted on
11/01/2001 12:20:18 PM PST
by
jlogajan
To: browardchad
"This was the first time that a biological agent was used against a civilian population, and we felt that it was important at the very least that the international community say something about it," said one senior European official.
The first time if you discount the smallpox blankets handed out to Native Americans... and by Europeans no less.
To: white trash redneck
The resolution would have noted that the use of biological weapons under the Biological Weapons Convention was prohibited, and that the United States had the unilateral right of military self-defense against a biological weapons attack under the United Nations charter. I hate to break it to the international community, but the US has a unilateral right to self-defense whether the UN agrees with it or not. And the Bush administration was absolutely correct in telling them 'No,' because we do not want the UN to send inspectors from terrorist countries to snoop around in our facilities. If they want to come to the US and look at anything, let them try to defeat us first, rather than see ourselves behave as if we have surrendered to them on the field of battle.
36
posted on
11/05/2001 10:59:26 PM PST
by
piasa
To: jlogajan
That's a clever thought, though it sounds a little too Clintonian for Bush. I hope you're wrong about it being domestic.I would really love for it to be home-grown, because the most likely foreign supplier, Saddam Hussein, has the facilities to make weaponized anthrax by the ton, and it may be here by the ton. This stuff is worse than nuclear fallout -- much worse. When I read that the 9/11 hijackers were researching "wind patterns," it gives me the willies. We could be talking about something continental in scale. Certainly, it would be in character for the sociopath who booby-trapped all the oil wells in Kuwait to plot a grand finale on those lines. Better hope it's just some kook in a log cabin, eh?
To: white trash redneck
European officials called the administration's rejection of the French proposal condemning the anthrax outbreak shortsighted and a missed opportunity.YEA A MISSED OPPORTUNITY TO GET THEIR UNITED NATIONS LOVING FOOT IN THE DOOR OF UNITED STATES POLICY
THE FU****** NEVER CEASE TO AMAZE ME JACK BOOTED STORM TROPPERS WITH A UNITED NATIONS LOGO GET THE U.S. OUT OF THE U.N. NOW....
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson