Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Little time in Afghanistan, little sense in D.C.
Star-Telegram, Fort Worth ^ | Nov 5 2001 6:17 | Molly Ivins

Posted on 11/04/2001 9:48:51 PM PST by CommiesOut

Little time in Afghanistan, little sense in D.C.

Molly Ivins

NEW YORK - It now looks, with 20/20 hindsight, as though we should have taken a few more deep breaths before smacking that tar baby that is Afghanistan. We're running out of time for three reasons: winter, Ramadan and the prospect of millions of people starving to death.

We've run out of time to set up a bridge or coalition government and so, of necessity, are throwing our lot with the Northern Alliance. According to an Afghan women's organization, the Northern Alliance is as bad as the Taliban and, in addition, consists of minority tribes that have always warred with the majority Pushtan.

We seem to have bombed everything bombable, including the Red Cross twice. At this point, it seems to me, we can give it another month and call the war for the season, which is what the Afghans do, and wait 'til next year without any disgrace.

What would be worse than disgraceful is causing mass starvation. The humanitarian aid folks are getting frantic about this, and we need to stop and figure out what we can do about it.

The trick to smiting back those who smote us is to first figure out where they are. This means using creative diplomacy and plain police work. We need to hit them without killing the innocents around them, and (as Jim Hightower observes) that calls for a scalpel, not a sledgehammer. If it takes years, it takes years.

The administration is in some danger of sacrificing one of its most important assets, which is the trust of the American people. The problem is not that everyone isn't singing off the same page but that some parties are being less than frank. And that is fatal to trust. There is no point in telling us that our "surgical, precision bombing" doesn't kill civilians. We're grown-ups - we know.

Meanwhile, back on the home front, Congress is engaged in criminal folly. Not only have the House folks passed this sickening bundle of tax cuts to benefit IBM, General Motors and General Electric, but they're telling us that to defend freedom, we must surrender freedom. In the name of democracy, we must abandon democracy.

There are 51 emergency anti-terrorism bills packaged under the meretricious title "Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act." (It stands for PATRIOT - cute, eh?) Among the more staggering proposals, PATRIOT authorizes indefinite detention of anyone "suspected" of any terrorist connection. The definition of "terrorist activity" is left largely to the FBI and the CIA, which have had notable difficulty grasping democratic principles in the past.

The definition is so broad that it would cover painting a peace sign in front of the State Department or protesting a meeting of the World Trade Organization. I am indebted to Hightower for a quote from Gunter Grass: "The first job of a citizen is to keep your mouth open."

Legislators have already passed much of this garbage and proudly claim that the most controversial surveillance sections will expire in 2005. In fact, the 2005 expiration date applies only to a tiny portion of the sprawling bill. The police will have permanent ability to conduct Internet surveillance without a court order and to secretly search homes and offices; the CIA will have cosmetic authority. It's an abomination.

As though this weren't bad enough, the CIA wants the power to assassinate people, just like terrorists. And the FBI, according to a Walter Pincus article in The Washington Post, is seeking power to "pressure" uncooperative prisoners by using drugs or "Israeli-style" methods. Why not just crack out the bastinado and the rack?

Bush has already created the infelicitously named Office of Homeland Security (such a weird, Orwellian ring) and given it powers to match those of the National Security Agency, with no congressional oversight of its activities or budget. That recipe is guaranteed to produce unhappy consequences.

In addition, Bush has established something called the Homeland Defense Command within the Pentagon, giving military authorities a chance to trump civilian authorities. Come on, is he really so little aware of how dangerous that is?

There is not the slightest evidence that any of the measures will do dog to stop terrorism. From what we know of how Sept. 11 happened, we have a visa system so full of holes that it's a disgrace, and a problem with airport security. There really is no inverse relationship between freedom and security - we can't make ourselves safer by making ourselves less free. All that happens when we make ourselves less free is that we're less free.

We also have an obligation to consider what kind of society we're making in unseemly haste and leaving to our children and future generations. We urgently need a serious national dialogue about these issues, but all we're getting from television is 24-hour exploitation of the anthrax scare.

Molly Ivins writes for Creators Syndicate. 5777 W. Century Blvd., Suite 700, Los Angeles, CA 90045



TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

1 posted on 11/04/2001 9:48:51 PM PST by CommiesOut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: madrussian; malarski; Askel5; GROUCHOTWO; Zviadist; kristinn; Free the USA; Black Jade...
-
2 posted on 11/04/2001 9:49:14 PM PST by CommiesOut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CommiesOut
I had more than enough of Molly during the Election. The local paper picked her up to aid in their anti-Bush propaganda.
3 posted on 11/04/2001 9:56:58 PM PST by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CommiesOut
Can anyone recall Molly Ivins being right about anything?

She's beyond kneepadding.

4 posted on 11/04/2001 10:02:53 PM PST by AmericanVictory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CommiesOut
Well, Molly made her deadline. What drivel!
5 posted on 11/04/2001 10:03:26 PM PST by Roy Tucker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CommiesOut
Is Molly ready to volunteer to lead the "All Women's Barfly Legion" into battle?
6 posted on 11/04/2001 10:04:32 PM PST by Mike Darancette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CommiesOut
Molly Ivins never refers to George W. Bush as President but prefers just "Bush" or "shrub" because of her venomous hatred of the Bush family. She's just a drunken an old leftist krone.
7 posted on 11/04/2001 10:05:30 PM PST by AF68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CommiesOut
Molly Ivins never refers to George W. Bush as President but prefers just "Bush" or "shrub" because of her venomous hatred of the Bush family. She's just a drunken old leftist krone.
8 posted on 11/04/2001 10:07:27 PM PST by AF68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AF68
I hear turkey basters run and hide when she's in town...
9 posted on 11/04/2001 10:08:44 PM PST by evolved_rage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CommiesOut
Blah Blah Blah Blah! Molly may I quote you?
10 posted on 11/04/2001 10:10:41 PM PST by Trapper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AF68
She's just a drunken old leftist krone.

And another in a long list of physically beautiful liberal women. (Cough.)

11 posted on 11/04/2001 10:10:45 PM PST by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AF68
Molly is an old gas-bag. Pinch your nostrils and move on...
12 posted on 11/04/2001 10:10:57 PM PST by Enduring Freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CommiesOut
Molly is writing to the 8% who don't understan what is at stake here. The other ninety-two percent are annoyed at this drivel.
13 posted on 11/04/2001 10:13:19 PM PST by Trapper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CommiesOut
...this is the latest from Kabul Molly...still freaking clueless.
14 posted on 11/04/2001 10:18:38 PM PST by Keith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CommiesOut
If the B52 wings run out of 500-pounders, maybe they can use Muley:

"mmmmoooooooOOOOOOOOOOOOOO...."

SPLAT!!!

15 posted on 11/04/2001 10:19:06 PM PST by RichInOC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trapper
"From what we know of how Sept. 11 happened, we have a visa system so full of holes that it's a disgrace, and a problem with airport security. There really is no inverse relationship between freedom and security - we can't make ourselves safer by making ourselves less free. All that happens when we make ourselves less free is that we're less free.

"We also have an obligation to consider what kind of society we're making in unseemly haste and leaving to our children and future generations. We urgently need a serious national dialogue about these issues, but all we're getting from television is 24-hour exploitation of the anthrax scare."

Hey, she has a GOOD ENDING here. Who among us can disagree with these two paragraphs????? She needs an editor who knows how to draw big red lines through the leftist cr*p and get her to elaborate on her accidental epiphany. Gasp, shock, there IS something to the last two paragraphs! And we aren't going to get anywhere on terrorism by fretting overmuch about a pretty duddy anthrax attack wave or by taking away Aunt Bea's nail clippers.

You all don't realize it but the left IS waking up. They meander a bit and fall into their old rhetorical habits, but I think they're finally pinching themselves and smelling the coffee.
16 posted on 11/04/2001 10:20:58 PM PST by ChemistCat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: CommiesOut
She's a nut, and knows about as much about how to conduct a war as most leftist women who are past having their periods - no knowledge and no guts. We need to put one of them thing-a-majigs on her to cover her ugly face and send her to the Taliwackers.
17 posted on 11/04/2001 10:24:45 PM PST by Judge Parker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: CommiesOut
I thought we banned her scribbles?
19 posted on 11/04/2001 10:34:54 PM PST by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CommiesOut
She starts out repeating the three biggest lies in the CNN/BBC lie-machine: winter, Ramadan, starvation.
It now looks, with 20/20 hindsight, as though we should have taken a few more deep breaths before smacking that tar baby that is Afghanistan. We're running out of time for three reasons: winter, Ramadan and the prospect of millions of people starving to death.

Winter: she and her liberal scum-buddies are dead wrong. Winter is the freind of the US forces in this war. Taliban/terrorist body-heat stands out better against the snowy backdrop.

Ramadan: This leftist/Muslim/scumbag lie has been thoroughly exposed in recent days. Even in the leftist/scumbag press. The fact is no Muslim soldier anywhere, has ever put down his weapon for Ramadan. And The Ramadan War was started by Arabs at the beginning of Ramadan. Last word: The US has said quite plainly that they will keep up the battle during Ramadan.

Famine: It was already there. For years. And getting worse. The only chance to stop the famine is to get in there and kill the Taliban.

20 posted on 11/04/2001 10:36:18 PM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson