Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: deport
While this doesn't surprise me, it puts the emphasis on the wrong thing, just as the charges about Enron's ties to Bush do.

Enron was ruthless and they attempted to use everyone they could to further their business goals. I have stated here for more than a year now (long before Enron appeared to be in trouble) that Enron CEO, Ken Lay, was a Republican in name only. Lay was out for Lay and for Enron, period.

Ken Lay was a big backer of Lee Brown for Houston Mayor this year. He publicly endorsed one the dumbest persons on the planet for Mayor, a liberal Democrat against a true conservative.

Why? Because Ken Lay and other "civic leaders" of Houston use this Mayor like a puppet to line their own pockets.

Lay and Enron were happy to use the Clinton Administration in the same way, and I'm sure they hoped they could do something similar with the Bush Administration. So, sure, Enron donated to Bush, but it wasn't because they supported the Administration. They wanted to buy it.

Bush hasn't done anything for Enron, unlike the Clinton Administration. Or, at least we haven't heard of anything. I'm sure folks are looking for something.

But Enron did this to itself, and it would have done it even without any help from politicians. It was aggressive and arrogant about its own ability to manage risk. They, as a corporation, truly thought they were smarter than the rest of us.

But like Icarus, it flew too close to the Sun, and its wings of wax melted.

Blaming politicians for what happened is pure political spin by anybody who engages in it. Enron alone is responsible.

14 posted on 12/09/2001 8:55:22 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Dog Gone
Well, dog, perhaps my last post was wrong, in that perhaps the corrupt from the world over seek fertile soil, and in the Clinton Corruption Core, they found a boundlessly, endlessly, corruptly fertile soil, and were magnetically drawn to it.
16 posted on 12/09/2001 9:00:49 AM PST by XBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Dog Gone
Their growth was phenominal in the power brokerage area. I can't remember the exact analogy but Enron was buying/selling more power than several of the major power companies combined. And they didn't own a generator, but they had vast numbers of traders swapping the commodity by the hour.....

Is Ken Lay a part of the Lay family that owns Frito-Lay?

18 posted on 12/09/2001 9:13:04 AM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Dog Gone
does ken lay = frito lay family? frito is a texas company, correct?
49 posted on 12/10/2001 8:43:25 AM PST by thinden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson