Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Putin Warns US Over War On Terror & Against Military Action Against Iraq
Financial Times ^

Posted on 12/16/2001 7:39:54 PM PST by Asmodeus

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

1 posted on 12/16/2001 7:39:55 PM PST by Asmodeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Asmodeus
So much for FRIENDSHIP!
2 posted on 12/16/2001 7:46:04 PM PST by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoseofTexas
Financial Times. I really take this report with a grain of salt!
3 posted on 12/16/2001 7:52:26 PM PST by Defender2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Asmodeus
don't worry mr.putin, powell is with you.
4 posted on 12/16/2001 7:53:08 PM PST by KQQL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoseofTexas
I wonder how our "friend" Putin would feel if the al-Qeada had taken one into the heart of mother Russia.
5 posted on 12/16/2001 7:54:59 PM PST by oldtimer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
mr putin should shut his damned mouth. he has forgotten he is the leader of a bankrupt, split, defunct nation with so much less relevande on the world stage than in the past. youre with us, or your against us, mr putin. our business is no business of yours, to hell with our detractors. TO HELL WITH ALL OF THEM!!
6 posted on 12/16/2001 7:56:20 PM PST by nocommies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Asmodeus
While I think we should finish the job in Iraq, I also realize how the rest of the world sees it. They do not see PROOF or even EVIDENCE that Iraq has actually attacked the US in such a way as to warrant punishment from US military forces. If we have such proof of Iraqi participation in any attack on the US, we must present it directly so we do not look like an aggressor nation.
7 posted on 12/16/2001 7:59:26 PM PST by NetValue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: nocommies
I do not see any evidence that this is as sinister as the Financial Times has portrayed it. The next step SHOULD be finanacial interdiction, which is what we are doing. The reporter is reading into this what he wishes.

Besides, I do not believe that Iraq was ever intended to be next, despite Bill Kristol's harrangues. We will go into Indonesia and The Phillippines (at the invitation of their governments) and also Somalia. We are tightening the noose, as the President has said.

9 posted on 12/16/2001 8:06:14 PM PST by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Asmodeus
I think Putin just wants a piece of the action. Let's not forget that Iraq is a commercial rival of Russia now.
10 posted on 12/16/2001 8:07:06 PM PST by Salman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NetValue
screw the rest of the world, we dont owe anybody a damned thing after all of this. there is evidence linking iraq to the wtc bombing in 1993, and every attack on us since then. clinton just set the tone for passivity, and the world has been spoiled by it. its time to fight, and fight like hell, with EVERYTHING weve got. bin laden wants WWIII, and he sure as smokin has more support than just his little boy al qaedas. he's just an arm and a distraction, helped by and working for iraq, syria, lebanon, the plo, pakistan, and the rest of the haters of the west. he isnt some bored jerk just hanging out in caves deciding on his own he's going to sail a couple jumbo birds into a couple buildings. he and those who support and harbor him are the scum of the earth. wouldnt surprise me if he was in iraq, iran, or pakistan. anyone who questions our actions is, by default, siding with osama, the anti christ himself.
11 posted on 12/16/2001 8:07:35 PM PST by nocommies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Defender2
Financial Times. I really take this report with a grain of salt!

Yep. It is short but very disjointed and it seems every writer around contributed to it.

Bush told Putin we were going to abandon the 1972 AMB treaty and Putin said no. Bush abandoned it. He will do the same with Iraq. If he decides to take Saddam out, Saddam had better get busy makes reservations elsewhere because he will be gone, Putin or no. This administration is not run by polls, committees or coalitions.

12 posted on 12/16/2001 8:08:10 PM PST by Mind-numbed Robot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
it says putin "warned specifically against military action in iraq." that's butting in to our business if you ask me.
13 posted on 12/16/2001 8:09:49 PM PST by nocommies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mind-numbed Robot
it sure IS refreshing that the white house is no longer occupied by spineless worms and jellyfish.
14 posted on 12/16/2001 8:11:28 PM PST by nocommies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Asmodeus
Well,sc#@^^w his sorry butt,too! Roll on!!
15 posted on 12/16/2001 8:12:06 PM PST by angry beaver norbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Asmodeus
What "warning"? I saw no "warning" here. In fact, Putin himself criticizes Iraq for its non-compliance with demands with respect to weapons inspection,"Russia wanted Iraq to re-admit UN weapons inspectors in exchange for a full lifting of sanctions, Mr Putin said. But he admitted this idea had "not met with understanding on the part of Iraq's leadership"."
16 posted on 12/16/2001 8:12:36 PM PST by Lent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Asmodeus
OK HOW MANY OF US KNEW THIS WAS COMMING? all of us you would have to be blind or stupid not to!
17 posted on 12/16/2001 8:13:42 PM PST by ATOMIC_PUNK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoseofTexas
Consultation script: hey, Russia, it is in our mutual interest to kick ____ 's butt. and actually, it usually is.
18 posted on 12/16/2001 8:15:02 PM PST by mathurine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Asmodeus
if iraq was not building weapons of mass destruction, then why ban the UN inspectors? they have already broken the agreement with the UN to have inspections there, seems to me that's reason enough for taking a closer look at them. putin needs to butt out, his country wasn't the one attacked & russia couldn't win the war in afghanistan when they were there. obviously, the U.S. knows what it's doing!!
19 posted on 12/16/2001 8:15:26 PM PST by blondee123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nocommies
Unfortunately, Putin thinks Iraq is his business, and a side note, what about China? I see this creating a major dilemma for us.
20 posted on 12/16/2001 8:17:12 PM PST by horsewhispersc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson