Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Universe Of Life: Maybe Not
spacedaily ^ | 7 Jan 02 | Karl Hill

Posted on 01/07/2002 8:54:10 AM PST by RightWhale

http://www.spacedaily.com/news/life-02a.html

A Universe Of Life: Maybe Not

by Karl Hill

Las Cruces - Jan 7, 2002

This vast universe surely holds plenty of worlds where life can flourish, right? Don't bet on it, says New Mexico State University physicist Slava Solomatov.

The more scientists learn about the conditions that make life possible on Earth, the more they realize how complex those factors are -- and how a relatively small change in one condition or another could have rendered the planet uninhabitable, Solomatov said.

"It's a very finely tuned system," he said. "Some of the factors are well known, but we still don't know what all the factors are."

Solomatov has a key part in a NASA-funded astrobiology research project aimed at better understanding the origin of life on Earth and the conditions in which life might be found elsewhere in the universe. The five-year, $4.9 million grant supports the work of a dozen researchers, headed by a team at the University of Washington.

The scientists come from a variety of fields, because life requires much more than water and the right mix of elements to survive and evolve into higher forms.

Solomatov's part of the project focuses on the role of plate tectonics -- the geologic process that results in the shifting of Earth's continental and oceanic plates. Only in recent years have scientists recognized the importance of plate tectonics in maintaining Earth's long-term temperature stability, through global recirculation of carbon dioxide from the planet's interior into the atmosphere, he said.

"Because carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas, it helps to keep our planet warm," he said. "Of course, too much of it is not good, but without this cycle over the centuries the temperature would drop and you might have the 'Snowball Earth' scenario."

Plate tectonics also provides diverse geological environments, like mountains, which promote biodiversity, Solomatov said.

No other planets are known to have plate tectonics, although some may have had the feature earlier in their evolution, he said.

Whether plate tectonics might be essential to the development of higher forms of life is unknown, but Solomatov's theoretical modeling of the complex processes aims to shed light on a number of key questions, including: What planetary conditions allow for the formation of plate tectonics? Are oceans necessary for plate tectonics? When and how did plate tectonics begin on Earth?

The question of life on other planets, or even the habitability of other planets, has long captured our imagination, but we tend to be biased in our assumptions, Solomatov said.

"We think this is normal and there should be planets all around the universe like Earth," he said. "The more I work in this area, the more I realize the chances really are very slim."

It's not enough for a planet to be the right size, to have water, and to be located the right distance from a star of the right size. Without the giant planet Jupiter as a neighbor, and without our moon, Earth might not be the living planet that it is, Solomatov said.

Jupiter has protected Earth from too many cataclysmic asteroid collisions, he explained -- but on the other hand, a neighbor much larger that Jupiter would not allow formation of an Earth-like planet in the first place. Similarly, our moon is just the right size to help stabilize Earth's spin axis and, as a consequence, the Earth's climate. With a bigger moon or no moon at all, a planet similar to Earth in other respects might not sustain life.

The list of critical factors grows longer as scientists learn more.

"At the moment there are two camps of believers," Solomatov said. "One believes in the 'Rare Earth' hypothesis and the other thinks life is smart and can adapt to extreme conditions."

The "Rare Earth" hypothesis, which takes its name from a book by University of Washington scientists Peter Ward and Don Brownlee, holds that microbial life might be common in planetary systems, but advanced life is rare.

If pushed into one camp or the other, Solomatov would choose the "Rare Earth" believers.

"We don't have enough data yet but all the evidence we have now points out that the Earth is a very special place," he said. "Maybe we should take better care of our planet."


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: crevolist; donaldbrownlee; peterward; rareearth; rareearthnonsense
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last
To: blam; RadioAstronomer
Be nice.

He is being nice :) , and he is in very good company. ;)

41 posted on 01/07/2002 11:43:03 AM PST by Scully
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: js1138
I'm amazed at all the rare-earthers that have sprung up. The last time I argued this on FR I was shouted down.

One factor is that Sagan is gone and silent. The pendulum has swung about as far as it is going to. It's still way over on the ET side, but more "we might be alone" voices are being heard recently.

42 posted on 01/07/2002 11:43:42 AM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
One of the scientific essays in the book "The Creation Hypothesis" examined the likelyhood of life developing in the universe based on random probability. Since the metabolic processes which define life can only function within a fairly limited range of environmental values the author identified 31 factors (gravity, average temperature, solar mass, etc) which would need to be within a particular range to have any chance of producing a "living" system. The analysis based on our current estimates of the number of stars and galaxies in the universe determined that less than one in 30 trillion planets could produce life by random processes alone. Since there are estimated to be about 3 trillion planets in the universe this means that it is virtually impossible for life to have developed anywhere. Which is another way of saying that the fact that life clearly exists here (not to mention intelligent life) can only be a miracle.
43 posted on 01/07/2002 11:59:53 AM PST by Dave Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scully
Your logic is similar the book the Chariot of the Gods. The sure numbers overwhelm us to think there is abundant intelligent life in the Universe, but the statistics quickly dissolve the argument.

There are 100 billion trillion stars in the Universe. If every star has one planet that could sustain life, then we have 10 to the 25th power possible life planets. Problem is that the odds of life are estimated to be 10 to the 32nd power (some estimates has high as 128th). So your one planet is earth.

44 posted on 01/07/2002 12:09:09 PM PST by 11th Commandment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: cliff630
If we are alone in the universe, then think of this.

After multi billions of years, in the unimaginable vastness of space, WE are the only thing the universe has been able to produce.

A very scary, and very sad postulation, isn't it ?

45 posted on 01/07/2002 12:14:47 PM PST by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
So call me a Medium-Rare Earther.

Suddenly you've recalled images of the the old Twilight Zone episode: "To Serve Man" featuring the guy who played Jaws in the James Bond films as the hungry alien. Happy new year VR !

46 posted on 01/07/2002 12:22:23 PM PST by Dukie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: 11th Commandment
Problem is that the odds of life are estimated to be 10 to the 32nd power (some estimates has high as 128th). So your one planet is earth.

Would you share your references, please?

47 posted on 01/07/2002 12:25:20 PM PST by Scully
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Drake Formula.
48 posted on 01/07/2002 12:33:34 PM PST by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Dave Wright
Well said, #43. Before the internet was widely available (about 1982) a U of Minnesota professor wrote a half page article in the Star-Trib about why it was impossible for other intelligent life to exist. Based on time alone, we should have already been contacted. Like Aquinasfan hinted, the anthropic principle reduces the odds of ET to less than statistical zero.
49 posted on 01/07/2002 12:43:23 PM PST by Dataman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
A very scary, and very sad postulation

Not really. On the aesthetic level this points out that since we appear to be it for intelligent life [people and dogs and ravens, etc.], we ought to feel a sense of importance.

Which is to say, if we don't go forth and multiply throughout the universe, we are not doing as we were instructed. We also need to stop fighting over this ball of dirt. Drop that RPG and get to work!

50 posted on 01/07/2002 1:08:47 PM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Dukie
Happy new year VR!

To you and yours also.

"To Serve Man"

Another double entendre to beware of (especially from Hannibal Lecter): "I'd like to have you over for dinner."

51 posted on 01/07/2002 1:10:27 PM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
The pendulum has swung about as far as it is going to.

Wow!!! That sentenced pinged me! Spooky that it happened on this thread.

52 posted on 01/07/2002 1:33:50 PM PST by Focault's Pendulum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Every time I run the Drake equation it comes up zero. Goose eggs. Do we exist? Maybe the result is due to the RightWhale factor I have added. Purpose of life. X p
53 posted on 01/07/2002 1:35:59 PM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Focault's Pendulum
This is a spooky thread. One of my fav places on the semantics chart.
54 posted on 01/07/2002 1:39:05 PM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
This is a spooky thread. One of my fav places on the semantics chart.

I really gotta stop fiddling around with the wires in the back...an image of you just flashed on my monitor...and I swear it looked like the Bug Blatterbeast of Thrall.

55 posted on 01/07/2002 1:41:45 PM PST by Focault's Pendulum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Focault's Pendulum
an image of you just flashed on my monitor

FR is really just tiny people living inside your computer.

56 posted on 01/07/2002 1:45:15 PM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: texson66;garyhope;John Robinson
I think we should all ask JohnRob to restore the bookmark function. I really miss it.
57 posted on 01/07/2002 1:47:32 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
FR is really just tiny people living inside your computer.

Thanks...all this time, I thought it was the voices in my head. Had me worried for a bit, as my speakers aen't working.

58 posted on 01/07/2002 1:48:09 PM PST by Focault's Pendulum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
A very scary, and very sad postulation, isn't it ?

Not really, since it means we won't have anybody else shooting at us when we want to grab some good real estate.

59 posted on 01/07/2002 1:50:57 PM PST by adx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Focault's Pendulum
When the ebbing tide retreats, along the rocky shoreline
It leaves a trail of tidal pools, in a short-lived galaxy
Each microcosmic planet, A complete society
A simple kind of mirror, to reflect upon our own
All the busy little creatures chasing out thier destinies
Living in the pools, they soon forget about the sea.

-Niel Peart
Rush/Permanent Waves

60 posted on 01/07/2002 1:58:36 PM PST by KeepUSfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson