Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Time to play :"Liberal or Conservative?"
Just a question ^ | 1/10/02 | me

Posted on 01/10/2002 7:20:15 PM PST by southern rock

O.K. So I am sitting in a bar, having a few $5 pitchers of beer with a buddy of mine, and we end up talking about a hypothetical situation I thought up a while back.

Let's say you have a group of really liberal thinking people. They decide to start a commune on a large piece of private property. Maybe each member owns an equal share of this land, or maybe it is owned by the the commune founder. Whatever. On their land, they are full-blown communists. There is no private property allowed. Everything is communally owned. They live by "from each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs". Guns are prohibited on the land, they don't beleive in them. They are also nudists. (Play along with me here, I am going to throw in every liberal, counter-culture thing I can think of). They have wild, perverted orgies every night. Homosexuality is tolerated. Anyway, you get the picture. I am going to leave wether they do drugs or not out of it, because I don't want to get into the whole legal thing. Suffice to say we don't know if they do drugs. If they do, they keep it so private, nobody knows it. They consider themselves "progressives".

However, and this is a big however, they have no desire to inflict their lifestyle on anyone else, or on society at large. They are very big on minding their own buisness. When they leave their property, they put their clothes on, and behave well. They simply want to live the way they choose on their own land. They don't vote for politicians who would promote their agenda and lifestyle on a local or national scale. They respect the private property of others, they simply don't want private property amongst themselves in their private little world. Their land, however, is definately private property.

So, my question is, do you consider these people liberals or conservatives? There is a very good argument to be made for calling them conservatives. They mind their own buisness. After all, are not liberals compelled to inflict their lifestyle and morality on society at large? Real liberals have the whole "we know what's best" attitude.

Maybe these folks are neither liberal or conservative. Maybe they are a hybred. Some might say they are libertarian, but I can't see libertarians wanting to live like that.

The debate is about the nature of liberalism, and conservatism. Does simply respecting private property rights, which these hypothetical people do (on a societal level), make you conservative? Does being sexulally immoral and libertine alone make you a liberal, or do you have to be totolitarian as well? Was I drinking too much when I thought this up? You guys tell me.


TOPICS: Editorial; Miscellaneous; Philosophy
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

1 posted on 01/10/2002 7:20:15 PM PST by southern rock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: southern rock
I would call them hypothetical.
2 posted on 01/10/2002 7:24:06 PM PST by Apollo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: southern rock
I think it's the last thing you said.
3 posted on 01/10/2002 7:24:59 PM PST by diggerwillow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OWK;freeeee;tpaine
Just looking for an opinion or two.
4 posted on 01/10/2002 7:27:54 PM PST by southern rock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: southern rock
I'd call them alcohol-induced hallucinations, but that's just me ;0)
5 posted on 01/10/2002 7:29:13 PM PST by Chad Fairbanks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dane;Cultural Jihad;sinkspur
I can't believe I am asking you guys' opinion, but what the hell! It's that king of topic. I am seeking diversity of opinion, after all. Try and answer in some seriousness.
6 posted on 01/10/2002 7:30:55 PM PST by southern rock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chad Fairbanks
Hey, I do my best philosophising (is that a word?) over those $5 pitchers. :)
7 posted on 01/10/2002 7:32:40 PM PST by southern rock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: southern rock
That being said, these people you mention sound fictional, and I say this only because everyone has an agenda... not having an agenda is an agenda unto itself... pass the beer ;0)
8 posted on 01/10/2002 7:35:05 PM PST by Chad Fairbanks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: southern rock
After 6 months, I would call them "very hungry". Such a society could not exist without any kind of coercion. It's the type of place that liberals want you to believe would be their utopia - but how long would the few chaste accept working overtime to produce penicillin, unless a gun is placed to their heads?
9 posted on 01/10/2002 7:36:30 PM PST by Senator Pardek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: southern rock
Was I drinking too much when I thought this up? You guys tell me.

At $5.00 a pitcher, I'd say you were drinking swill.

Who the hell goes drinkin' and starts talking about nekkid liberals?

10 posted on 01/10/2002 7:37:32 PM PST by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: southern rock
I think they can best be called communitarians.

And as a constitutional libertarian, I see nothing wrong with their rather sicko lifestyle, as long as they stick to nonviolent, noncoersive perversions, and don't 'scare the horses'.

11 posted on 01/10/2002 7:38:41 PM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: southern rock
Maybe you could call them "non-proselytizing libertarians"
12 posted on 01/10/2002 7:39:00 PM PST by xm177e2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: southern rock
Libertines.

What you've done is discover that there are social conservatives and radical individualists that both can be called "conservatives". It's nothing new, this sort of debate raged back in the '50s when "fusionism" was the argument. The Cold War used to keep such debates in the background.

Chronicles often runs pieces on this sort of issue. You might want to try:

"What is Paleoconservativism"

13 posted on 01/10/2002 7:39:31 PM PST by Pelham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: southern rock
For the answer read The Moon is a Harsh Mistress by Robert A. Heinlein.
14 posted on 01/10/2002 7:40:09 PM PST by Quicksilver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: southern rock
This really is a thought-provoker, southern rock. At first it seems like "Libertarian" is the most likely category. However, the more you think about it, you find that arguments can be made for all sides. Interesting...

I'm gonna bookmark this and look at it again when I'm not so tired.

15 posted on 01/10/2002 7:41:22 PM PST by NH Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Senator Pardek
After 6 months, I would call them "very hungry". Such a society could not exist without any kind of coercion. It's the type of place that liberals want you to believe would be their utopia - but how long would the few chaste accept working overtime to produce penicillin, unless a gun is placed to their heads?

According to what he posted, they all have real jobs. Stalin couldn't force EVERYONE in Soviet Russia to work to support the commune, but you don't think you could find a dozen good, hardworking people who would choose to live on your commune (and risk expulsion if they didn't work)?

16 posted on 01/10/2002 7:41:31 PM PST by xm177e2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
At $5.00 a pitcher, I'd say you were drinking swill. Who the hell goes drinkin' and starts talking about nekkid liberals?

I'm not a beer snob. I drink quantity, not quality. And this is the best I can do as far as deep thinking goes, over the loud country music and bar fights. So let's just play along. Drink a pitcher of swill if you must. :-)

17 posted on 01/10/2002 7:42:45 PM PST by southern rock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: southern rock
So, my question is, do you consider these people liberals or conservatives?

Yes. (Sorry, I just finished a discussion of logic in my math class.)

18 posted on 01/10/2002 7:43:27 PM PST by Romestamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
"Who the hell goes drinkin' and starts talking about nekkid liberals?"

HeeHeeHee!!!

19 posted on 01/10/2002 7:44:28 PM PST by NH Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Senator Pardek
"After 6 months, I would call them "very hungry"."

ROF!!!

20 posted on 01/10/2002 7:45:32 PM PST by NH Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson