Posted on 01/10/2002 8:23:49 PM PST by doug from upland
The RATS are circling in the waters like sharks. They go to bed every night hoping upon hope that they can do something to destroy the Bush administration.
Do the RATS care about our war effort? Perhaps some of them do. I would say, however, that the great majority of the far leftist hardcore of the RAT party wants Bush to have trouble more than they want the U.S. to defeat terrorism. Hey, that's why we call them the RATS.
We hear the Clinton complicit press jumping all over the Enron case and comparing it to Whitewater. Some have already suggested it is much worse.
It is clear to any good Clintonologist why they think it is worse. They loved Clinton. They hate Bush. They were too lazy or too stupid, or both, to follow what happened in the myriad of scandals called Whitewater. And the Clinton DNA is still dripping down their chins. If they can make Bush look bad, they can make Clinton look better. There is that legacy thing, you know.
Will Enron be a problem for Bush? It will be an irritant as the RATS think it is payback time. They will attempt to smear this president with the same enthusiasm as they tried to protect and defend real Clinton criminal activity.
But the real difference should put some of you at ease. George W. Bush is basically a decent and honest man. Conversely, we learned very early that Bill Clinton was a lying, manipulating, evil, self-serving, piece of human debris.
The first instinct of Bush is to tell the truth. The first instinct of Clinton is to tell a lie.
Clinton, we know, would do anything to be president. In fact, he did. There was nothing out of bounds. Bush did not need the job. His life would be fine without out. Certainly it would be less stressful.
Might they find some wrongdoing? There is a chance, however, I doubt it. Unlike Clinton, Bush has surrounded himself with good people rather than compromised people. Clinton sick-o-fants stayed with him because they were as dishonest as their boss. It started at the top and ran right down the line.
It should give you comfort that a pretty honest and decent man with character is guiding our ship in these troubled waters. Those who did wrongdoing are not going to get a pass in this administration.
Maybe the RATS will concentrate on a dead end and damage themselves even more. Hey, this took moronic Tommy Daschel off the front page.
EWWWWW!!
I think Enron, like the stem cell research 'issue', is going to be a flash in the pan. Actually, I think the Enron debacle will be more interesting to watch.
I find it hard to believe that the lamestream media is trying to link Enron to the administration...and I'm guilty of it too.
TIME Magazine
SEPTEMBER 1, 1997 VOL. 150 NO. 9 NOTEBOOK
THE SCOOP
THE WHITE HOUSE
THAT INVISIBLE MACK SURE CAN LEAVE HIS MARK
For a man who had supposedly vanished from the corridors of power, MACK MCLARTY was the man to see in 1996. BILL CLINTON's former chief of staff, now a White House counselor tucked away in the basement, provided assistance to businessmen who ponied up $1.5 million for the Democrats in the last election. On Nov. 22, 1995, for example, Clinton scrawled an FYI note to McLarty, enclosing a newspaper article on Enron Corp. and the vicissitudes of its $3 billion power-plant project in India. McLarty then reached out to Enron's chairman, KEN LAY, and over the next nine months closely monitored the project with the U.S. ambassador to New Delhi, keeping Lay informed of the Administration's efforts, according to White House documents reviewed by TIME. In June 1996, four days before India granted final approval to Enron's project, Lay's company gave $100,000 to the President's party. Enron denies that its gift was repayment for Clinton's attention, and White House special counsel LANNY DAVIS says McLarty acted out of concern for a major U.S. investment overseas.
Nevertheless, there does seem to be a McLarty pattern. At Clinton's request, he met with international oil consultant ROGER TAMRAZ and asked the Energy Department if the Administration could not be more supportive of his Caspian Sea pipeline proposal (Tamraz' contribution: $200,000). It was McLarty who directed a White House lawyer to query the Justice Department about a case protested by VANCE OPPERMAN, head of a legal publishing house (contribution: $350,000). The counselor arranged a White House meeting for Miami computer executive MARK JIMENEZ to discuss political unrest in an important Latin American market (contribution: $325,000). And last week the Washington Post reported that McLarty helped get a Clinton audience for Federal Express chairman FRED SMITH and his concerns about Japanese trade practices. Contribution: $525,000. Davis says McLarty acted "appropriately" in every case.
--By Michael Weisskopf/Washington
The short answer is "No". Because there was no misbehavior on his part, I am confident.
That will not keep the Dems from trying, however. Or the press from suggesting that there is a link...
In the end, they'll chip a few points off the approval rating. Which is all I suspect they hope to accomplish, anyway.
The rats have way too much stink in this and pinning it on Bush is not going to happen.
Cramer said he was blasted three years ago for talking down enron and he caught hell from his dem friends--he now says he was right and all this happened under the rats control of the white House !
He also said the rats were nuts for blaming the recession on Bush !
The Clinton administration has a much more difficult problem with Enron in comparison. They took money from Enron and then used their influence to assist Enron offshore. And even that is not probably not illegal.
The Dems. better drop this Enron stuff. It will go nowhere for them. The outfit that will take the big hit will be the one "Big 5" accounting firm. And they will be bankrupt soon too.
And prosecute the criminals.
It's that easy.
===============================================
With the truth.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.