Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russian Defense To Get New Missile...
AP/ABC ^

Posted on 01/15/2002 3:18:38 PM PST by RCW2001

Russian Defense to Get New Missile
Russian Air Defense Troops to Get New Missile in Late 2002 or Early 2003

The Associated Press


M O S C O W, Jan. 15

A new Russian missile that can target stealth aircraft and intermediate-range ballistic missiles will be ready for operation late this year or in early 2003, a news agency reported Tuesday.

The Interfax-Military News Agency said that tests of the air defense missile, the S-400 Triumph, will take place soon, according to an unidentified spokesman for the air defense troops.

The spokesman didn't say how many missiles would be deployed or where.

Russia's air force chief Col. Gen. Anatoly Kornukov initially said the first examples of the S-400 would enter duty in late 2001. He said the missile's deployment had taken longer than planned because of funding shortages and technical problems.

Details on the new missile have been scarce, but Russian military observers have said it can hit targets up to 250 miles away and engage stealth aircraft. The latest versions of its predecessor, the S-300, have a a range of 124 miles.

While the S-300 can shoot down short-range missiles, the S-400 can engage intermediate range ballistic missiles that have a range of 2,170 miles, according to an official Russian arms catalog.

When Russia proposed last year to create a joint missile defense system with Western European countries, Russian military officials mentioned both the S-300 and S-400 as possible components. The proposal, seen largely as an attempt to rally European criticism against the U.S. missile defense plan, has been short on detail and was quietly shelved.

The Interfax-Military News Agency also reported that the Russian military plans to upgrade the existing S-300 missiles to the higher S-300 PMU2 Favorite standard. A new short-range air defense missile, the Pantsyr, will also become operational this year, it said.

Russia's air defense troops will receive new radars in Russia's far north, northeast, central Siberia and the Far East, the report said. It added that more than 50 percent of air defense units took part in live firing exercises last year compared to 20 percent in 1997 and 40 percent in 2000.



TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

1 posted on 01/15/2002 3:18:39 PM PST by RCW2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RCW2001,backhoe,tallhappy,Black Jade,Travis McGee,Alamo Girl,flamefront
Looks like they are gearing up for a near-term blow-up with....us? (Note enhancement of radars along the likely bombing routes of U.S. forces)
2 posted on 01/15/2002 3:30:49 PM PST by Paul Ross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001,backhoe,tallhappy,Black Jade,Travis McGee,Alamo Girl,flamefront
Looks like they are gearing up for a near-term blow-up with....us? (Note enhancement of radars along the likely bombing routes of U.S. forces)
3 posted on 01/15/2002 3:30:51 PM PST by Paul Ross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
Cute- there's more info on the earlier S-300 here:

-Links for Missile Defense- Nuke News--

4 posted on 01/15/2002 3:55:21 PM PST by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
Guess they were ready for the US withdrawal from the ABM treaty. In fact, they were more than ready! It sounds as if they've been working around it all along.
5 posted on 01/15/2002 4:18:41 PM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
Look into the underground complex--the size of Washington, D.C.--they are building under the Urals. Frantic, round-the-clock activity...and they change the subject whenever we ask what it is for.

Also check out their stockpiles of CBW and their massive chemical and bio-warfare program...which has never stopped, or been cut back.

They're our friends.

--Boris

6 posted on 01/15/2002 4:31:44 PM PST by boris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross; OKCSubmariner; Sawdring
From FAS
7 posted on 01/15/2002 4:51:54 PM PST by flamefront
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: boris
What you refer to is Yamantou Mt. If you or any others have additional links on this topic it would be much appreciated. Thanks, BM.
8 posted on 01/15/2002 4:53:51 PM PST by GOP_1900AD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: belmont_mark, rightwing2, sawdring, super175, tallhappy, noswad
Bump.
9 posted on 01/15/2002 4:55:53 PM PST by GOP_1900AD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: Pearls Before Swine
Guess they were ready for the US withdrawal from the ABM treaty. In fact, they were more than ready! It sounds as if they've been working around it all along.

That was my first thought also. So much for the ABM treaty anyway. Maybe it is really a good thing Bush pulled out of it.

12 posted on 01/15/2002 6:22:49 PM PST by Mark17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 2sheep; Zad; babylonian; OKCSubmariner
FYI
13 posted on 01/15/2002 6:22:59 PM PST by Prodigal Daughter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: flamefront
I guess Russia wants to protect herself from rogue states using ballistic missiles with ranges between 0 and 3500 km, Eh??
14 posted on 01/15/2002 6:39:48 PM PST by OKCSubmariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Prodigal Daughter
Thanks for the flag on this article.
15 posted on 01/15/2002 6:42:37 PM PST by OKCSubmariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
Thanks for the heads up!
16 posted on 01/15/2002 6:49:59 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001

17 posted on 01/15/2002 10:24:18 PM PST by klpt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Serge
If US chose to scrap ABM treaty then why so fuss when Russia doing the same?

Because the missiles didn't appear overnight. They are the product of years of work. That means that it appears the Russians weren't abiding by the treaty--they only wanted us to. Is there any other way to interpret this?`

There wouldn't be any fuss if these missiles appeared two or three years after the scrapping of the treaty. It would be expected on both sides.

18 posted on 01/16/2002 4:20:48 AM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: Pearls Before Swine
Do you remember how quickly the Stealth bomber that crashed in Bosnia (?) was scooped up, by the Russians I presume. For decades, they have stolen our technology in order to reverse engineer or in this case learn how to defeat it, just as the Chinese have done.

Additionally, any President of Russia who strongly protests our own self-defense while spending at least a decade of effort creating this kind of weaponry is duplicitous. If Russia was only interested in defending against an attack by the United States, it would not protest our creation of a defense shield which would protect us from them. The aim of Communism was not to defend against Capitalist states. It was to destroy us. Has that thinking changed in their military?

20 posted on 01/16/2002 10:14:18 AM PST by The Westerner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson