Replies

IMHO, it seems to be a subtle, clever ploy to promote the gay agenda within prolife circles (infiltration, co-option, slick PR) than a viceversa of a pro-life co-opting of the gay movement.

IMHO, it seems to be a subtle, clever ploy to promote the gay agenda within prolife circles (infiltration, co-option, slick PR) than a viceversa of a pro-life co-opting of the gay movement.

That seems likely. If they were really sincere, they could try to test Nellie.

Have a group go next year in white sheets and hoods. Let them carry a banner proclaiming, "Klansmen for Life." If Nellie doesn't ask that they be removed, I'll agree with the homosexuals that they are being mistreated. I suspect that "Klansmen for Life" wouldn't be tolerated.

And I would expect those homosexuals to jumpt to the defense of the Klansmen and demand that Nellie let everyone in who wants in.

Shalom.

"IMHO, it seems to be a subtle, clever ploy to promote the gay agenda within prolife circles (infiltration, co-option, slick PR) "

The PLAGAL members whom I've met and worked with simply aren't that way. Your supposition is wrong. But even if they were recruiting, they still belong and in fact strengthen the pro-life argument. Their voice is as legitimate as your own.