Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THE HILLARY, YOU KNOW, CLINTON TRANSCRIPT: Analyzed and Annotated
CNN-Greenfield at Large | 1-23-02 | Mia T

Posted on 01/23/2002 2:08:18 PM PST by Mia T

THE HILLARY, YOU KNOW, CLINTON TRANSCRIPT:
Analyzed and Annotated

by Mia T

January 22, 2002

 

THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE [YOU KNOW] 'UPDATED'

 

ABSTRACT

Background:

Using internal polling, the clinton 'infrastructure' determined that its cozy-clintonoid-interviews-of-the-Colmes/King-kind scheme is no longer working. The scheme, which successfully shepherded and shielded the vacuous, inept, corrupt clintons for nine years, is now, post-9/11, yielding diminishing returns--and worse--increasing ridicule.

Hence, we had the clinton 'infrastructure' interviewer recalculation last week that specified more interviewer gravitas...and less lapdog...but not more doggedness...that is to say...that specified Jeff Greenberg.

A miscalculation, as it turned out. Greenberg made up in contempt what he lacked in inexorability. (Although he conducted the entire interview circumambulating on eggshells, Greenberg did eventually ask the ugly questions.)

Analysis:

Greenberg's circuitous path to clinton depravity and failure necessitates a nonlinear analysis of the data; we will use a nonlinear least squares curve fitter. Proportional hazards political survival regression analysis will generate a political survival curve for hillary clinton, which will show her viability (so to speak) over time.

Political survival time is defined as the length of the interval between the initial political trial balloon and political moribundity. Political moribundity is defined as two consecutive political failures--(one in the case of 9/11), or three not-necessarily-consecutive boo-filled public appearances, or one instance of a serious proposal generating laughter.

ASIDE: Since by any of these standards, hillary clinton is already flatlined, the more interesting question for this analysis would be: "What the hell is this moribund loser doing in the political arena, anyway?"

Survival is influenced by one or more factors, called "predictors" or "covariates", which may be categorical (such as the quality of 'infrastructure') or continuous (such as intellect or eloquence or character).

Results:

  • clinton rigor mortis rendered any discussion of clinton moribundity moot.
  • Nonetheless, one of the more significant continuous predictors of political moribundity is clinton's tic-like insertion of "you know," a marker for ineloquence, vulgarity, ignorance, rube-meets-valley-girl demographics, low self-esteem, anxiety and insincerity.
  • clinton uttered "you know" 52 times. (Greenfield eventually caught the bug and uttered six "you knows," himself.) Frequency of clinton "you knows" varied directly with intensity of Greenfield contempt and inversely with magnitude of Greenfield softballs.
  • clinton confirmed my hypothesis of Rubin complicity in a clinton coup. See "The Daschle Scheme".

GREENFIELD: Tonight, a conversation with Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton on the nation and the world after September 11, on GREENFIELD AT LARGE.

THE COMPLETE ANNOTATED INTERVIEW


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Extended News
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 01/23/2002 2:08:19 PM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Gail Wynand; looscannon; Lonesome in Massachussets; river rat; Freedom'sWorthIt; IVote2; Slyfox...
Q ERTY6 you know ping!
2 posted on 01/23/2002 2:15:13 PM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
clinton uttered "you know" 52 times.

And she inserts a lot of "ahs". That's her generations' equivalent of "like." Ever sit on a bus and listen to teens and 20's conversations? It's almost as bad as listening to Her Heinous.

3 posted on 01/23/2002 2:15:47 PM PST by stanz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Another of your "Must keep" posts Mia.

It doesn't take a W to say "Uh" and "You know". (I am waiting for another of your QWERTY delights.) :o)

4 posted on 01/23/2002 2:26:46 PM PST by IVote2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Brevity is the soul of wit.
5 posted on 01/23/2002 2:30:30 PM PST by southernnorthcarolina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IVote2
Great suggestion...but, you know, "you know" does have a "w"... ;)
6 posted on 01/23/2002 2:41:43 PM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: southernnorthcarolina
You're, you know, right. That's why I, you know, stashed the annotated transcript in a, you know, remote location. ;)
7 posted on 01/23/2002 2:43:59 PM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mia T; Freee-dame
Fabulous work, ya know!
8 posted on 01/23/2002 2:45:59 PM PST by maica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Ah shucks.. so it does. Do they spell knoW that way in Arkansas?
9 posted on 01/23/2002 2:46:41 PM PST by IVote2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Just twisting your tail a bit, in a gentle way. You're very creative, and I enjoy your posts. But they (or their links) do tend to run on.

FReegards
SNC

10 posted on 01/23/2002 2:53:31 PM PST by southernnorthcarolina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: southernnorthcarolina

Just twisting your tail a bit, in a gentle way. You're very creative, and I enjoy your posts. But they (or their links) do tend to run on.

You might want to consider (art imitates life!) that there is a reason her posts on HIll and BIll,

RUN ON and ON and ON and ON.

11 posted on 01/23/2002 3:06:03 PM PST by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Good job, you knowwwwwww!!!!
12 posted on 01/23/2002 3:21:41 PM PST by Soaring Feather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
Excellent point. And certainly the fact that Rodham-Clinton was elected Senator will have the effect of keeping both of them in our faces for years to come. If I live to be 100, I'll never understand how even such a liberal state as NY elected this heinous woman.
13 posted on 01/23/2002 3:23:46 PM PST by southernnorthcarolina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
The only way they can win is to convince people that we're space aliens. -- Bill Clinton

You know...we won. Musta worked.

14 posted on 01/23/2002 4:43:23 PM PST by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Take any business and/or speech classes and they will tell you that the uses of "uh" and "you know" are very unprofessional. Yet, you will never hear the press go after ol' Thunder Thighs' speech patterns like they will W's.
15 posted on 01/23/2002 6:18:48 PM PST by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
we will use a nonlinear least squares curve fitter. Proportional hazards political survival regression analysis will generate a political survival curve for hillary clinton, which will show her viability (so to speak) over time.

You're breaking new and (you know) very exciting ground here, Mia. Now there will be text books written using your finely-honed analytical techniques.

Brilliant stuff here.

16 posted on 01/24/2002 2:39:19 AM PST by be-baw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: UCANSEE2; southernnorthcarolina

You might want to consider (art imitates life!) that there is a reason her posts on HIll and BIll, RUN ON and ON and ON and ON. --UCANSEE2

 

You make an excellent point. I must remember that one. ;)

I would hasten to add that in the case of the clintons, the converse, (life imitates art), also applies...

Note that in the interest of brevity, I am adding the following warning to the transcript link:

THE COMPLETE ANNOTATED INTERVIEW (NB: a very long, you know, download because of the, you know, clinton criminal, you know, redundancy.)


19 posted on 01/24/2002 4:42:35 AM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2; southernnorthcarolina
SORRY! WRONG LINK

SHOULD BE: life imitates art

20 posted on 01/24/2002 4:56:59 AM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: stanz
She does utilize "ahs" frequently. I once commented about this aspect of her speech to a dem attorney friend, and he said that it was a sign of intelligence. LOL The smartest woman in the world urban legend lives on.
21 posted on 01/24/2002 5:02:38 AM PST by Angelique
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: southernnorthcarolina
One word, my friend,"voter fraud".

After further review, one might add "fbi files".

22 posted on 01/24/2002 5:05:26 AM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Another great post. Do not listen to those who accuse you of a Hillaryism of running on. I have not seen any ahs and you knows, except to quote the great malingering Madam of Bill the prevaricating prostitute.
23 posted on 01/24/2002 5:09:43 AM PST by Angelique
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Angelique; stanz

She does utilize "ahs" frequently. I once commented about this aspect of her speech to a dem attorney friend, and he said that it was a sign of intelligence. LOL The smartest woman in the world urban legend lives on.

21 posted on 1/24/02 6:02 AM Pacific by Angelique

The chief clinton "UH"-ster huckster, Sandy Berger, is the obvious counterexample.

clinton CYA-ing Q ERTY6 "uh" BUMP!

Because the frequency and intensity of pathetic CYA maneuvers by the clintons and their gang are increasing in direct proportion to the increasing frequency and intensity of editorial comment fingering clinton for 9-11, I suspect clinton CYA-ing will soon reach critical mass.

At that historic, civilization-sparing moment, Sandy Berger (along with his smarmy revisionism) will implode by virtue of one-too-many pressure-deflating "uhs"...taking the two inept, corrupt, cowardly, self-serving Boss-Dweeb dullards down with him.


24 posted on 01/24/2002 6:02:53 AM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Angelique
The chief clinton "UH"-ster huckster, Sandy Berger, is the obvious counterexample.

Clinton's failure to grasp the opportunity to unravel increasingly organized extremists, coupled with Berger's assessments of their potential to directly threaten the U.S., represents one of the most serious foreign policy failures in American history

Clinton Let Bin Laden Slip Away and Metastasize

 

 

Bill Clinton may not be the worst president America has had, but surely he is the worst person to be president.*

---GEORGE WILL, Sleaze, the sequel

 

Had George Will written Sleaze, the sequel (the "sequel" is, of course, hillary) after 9-11-01, I suspect that he would have had to forgo the above conceit, as the doubt expressed in the setup phrase was, from that day forward, no longer operational.

Indeed, assessing the clinton presidency an abject failure is not inconsistent with commentary coming from the left, most recently the LA Times: "Clinton Let Bin Laden Slip Away and Metastasize."

When the clintons left office, I predicted that the country would eventually learn--sadly, the hard way--that this depraved, self-absorbed and inept pair had placed America (and the world) in mortal danger. But I was thinking years, not months.

It is very significant that hillary clinton didn't deny clinton culpability for the terrorism. (Meet the Press, 12-09-01), notwithstanding tired tactics (if you can't pass the buck, spread the blame) and chronic "KnowNothing Victim Clinton" self-exclusion.

If leftist pandering keeps the disenfranchized down in perpetuity, clinton pandering,("it's the economy, stupid"), kept the middle and upper classes wilfully ignorant for eight years.

And ironically, both results (leftist social policy and the clinton economy) are equally illusory, fraudulent. It is becoming increasingly clear that clinton assiduously avoided essential actions that would have negatively impacted the economy--the ultimate source of his continued power--actions like, say, going after the terrorists.

It is critically important that hillary clinton fail in her grasp for power; read Peggy Noonan's little book, 'The Case Against Hillary Clinton' and Barbara Olson's two books; it is critical that the West de-clintonize, but that will be automatic once it is understood that the clintons risked civilization itself in order to gain and retain power.

It shouldn't take books, however, to see that a leader is a dangerous, self-absorbed sicko. People should be able to figure that out for themselves. The electorate must be taught to think, to reason. It must be able to spot spin, especially in this age of the electronic demagogue.

I am not hopeful. As Bertrand Russell noted, "Most people would sooner die than think; in fact, they do so. "

Mia T, hillary clinton blames hubby for terrorism

(SHE knew nuttin')

Meet the Press, 12-09-01

 

 

*George Will continues: There is reason to believe that he is a rapist ("You better get some ice on that," Juanita Broaddrick says he told her concerning her bit lip), and that he bombed a country to distract attention from legal difficulties arising from his glandular life, and that. ... Furthermore, the bargain that he and his wife call a marriage refutes the axiom that opposites attract. Rather, she, as much as he, perhaps even more so, incarnates Clintonism

Q ERTY3 co-rapist  bump!

25 posted on 01/24/2002 6:11:22 AM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: all
"Greenfield" not "Greenberg" oops

ABSTRACT

Background:

Using internal polling, the clinton 'infrastructure' determined that its cozy-clintonoid-interviews-of-the-Colmes/King-kind scheme is no longer working. The scheme, which successfully shepherded and shielded the vacuous, inept, corrupt clintons for nine years, is now, post-9/11, yielding diminishing returns--and worse--increasing ridicule.

Hence, we had the clinton 'infrastructure' interviewer recalculation last week that specified more interviewer gravitas...and less lapdog...but not more doggedness...that is to say...that specified Jeff Greenfield.

A miscalculation, as it turned out. Greenfield made up in contempt what he lacked in inexorability. (Although he conducted the entire interview circumambulating on eggshells, Greenfield did eventually ask the ugly questions.)

Analysis:

Greenfield's circuitous path to clinton depravity and failure necessitates a nonlinear analysis of the data; we will use a nonlinear least squares curve fitter. Proportional hazards political survival regression analysis will generate a political survival curve for hillary clinton, which will show her viability (so to speak) over time.

Political survival time is defined as the length of the interval between the initial political trial balloon and political moribundity. Political moribundity is defined as two consecutive political failures--(one in the case of 9/11), or three not-necessarily-consecutive boo-filled public appearances, or one instance of a serious proposal generating laughter.

ASIDE: Since by any of these standards, hillary clinton is already flatlined, the more interesting question for this analysis would be: "What the hell is this moribund loser doing in the political arena, anyway?"

Survival is influenced by one or more factors, called "predictors" or "covariates", which may be categorical (such as the quality of 'infrastructure') or continuous (such as intellect or eloquence or character).

Results:

  • clinton rigor mortis rendered any discussion of clinton moribundity moot.
  • Nonetheless, one of the more significant continuous predictors of political moribundity is clinton's tic-like insertion of "you know," a marker for ineloquence, vulgarity, ignorance, rube-meets-valley-girl demographics, low self-esteem, anxiety and insincerity.
  • clinton uttered "you know" 52 times. (Greenfield eventually caught the bug and uttered six "you knows," himself.) Frequency of clinton "you knows" varied directly with intensity of Greenfield contempt and inversely with magnitude of Greenfield softballs.
  • clinton confirmed my hypothesis of Rubin complicity in a clinton coup. See "The Daschle Scheme".

26 posted on 01/24/2002 6:35:46 AM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: be-baw, Mia T
Yes. BTTT
27 posted on 01/24/2002 6:56:48 AM PST by OKSooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Ya done good...as usual.
28 posted on 01/24/2002 7:01:58 AM PST by stanz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
!!!! The incomparable MiaT strikes again!

I missed the Greenfield interview - and, am so glad I did. Your analyzed and annotated transcript is, like you know, da bomb! Many thanks! You need to be ON TV!

29 posted on 01/24/2002 7:12:07 AM PST by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
I missed some of your great posts. Thanks.

I did watch Heir Hitlary,(although she is actually a Stalinist), on MTP. She must have studied Hitler, however, living his infamous quote: Great liars are also great magicians. Just add, they make anything they want to disappear such as culpability.

Regarding Sandy Berger, or any of the wretchedly incompetent Clinton cabinet, it got to the point that I would or could not listen to them. Worse, the media gave them credence, just like Doris Goodwin.

There were two historians that were on Face the Nation, and if you can believe it, were not Goodwin and that other guy they usually have. When the subject turned to Clinton, they both almost called him a buffoon. I wish the subject would have turned to Hillary.

30 posted on 01/24/2002 7:14:31 AM PST by Angelique
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox
The only way they can win is to convince people that we're space aliens. -- Bill Clinton
You know...we won. Musta worked.
14 posted on 1/23/02 5:43 PM Pacific by Slyfox

It didn't take much convincing. They ARE space aliens.

 

The only way they can win is to convince people that we're space aliens.

--bill clinton

 
 

 

 
 
June 9, 1999
 
Peggy Noonan's excellent piece in yesterday's Wall Street Journal is really the story of the death of democracy. At its core it is the description of the human double helix gone terribly awry, of a denatured protein grotesquely twisted, of two mutant, tangled strands of DNA, the basest imaginable of base pairs linked permanently, as firmly as guanine to cytosine, bill inexorably to hillary and conversely, doing what they do best, and doing it relentlessly.
 
Killing.
Killing insidiously.
Killing as they pose and pander and feel our pain.
 
My only complaint is with Peggy Noonan's title.
The Mad Boomer, doesn't begin to capture candidate clinton considered separately or even taken as the self-anointed "twofer," permanently conjoined at that cavity conspicuously empty except for ego, that place where brain and soul and guts and heart normally reside.
 
This is not to say that she -- that they -- are not both quite mad and of that self-indulgent, arrogantly, ignorantly solipsistic age sandwiched flatly between yesterday's innocence and tomorrow's insouciance. Rather, it is that their madness and their boomerism don't even begin to explain their noxious influence: The cloying, internally inconsistent clinton calculus. The unspoken clinton threats. They permeate the atmosphere like a coiling miasma, choking off all freedom.
 
Even in New York.
Especially in New York.
When she wrote "The New Colossus," Emma Lazarus hardly had in mind this pair of mutant, deadly, twisted aliens.
 
So forget Arkansas-Illinois carpetbaggery and standard issue muckraking. The clintons are aliens of quite another sort. They are extrinsic, not of this world. They are inhuman. They are dehumanizing.
 
You may recall that the first act of this story of two degenerates maintained by iterating idiots, farce of farce ad infinitum, was generated quite by accident by iterated AlGoreRhythm, who, it should be noted, is now himself the object of iterated calculation by said degenerates who want iteration 2004 all for themselves.
 
And thus the odd bit of bloody Gore in Act II: The ugly sight of a corrupt, bottom-heavy hillary self-impaled on the horns of a Treason-Dilemma- masquerading-as-a-Third-Term-Dilemma-masquerading-as-a-Senate-stampede, for example, or bill's recent unsolicited, underwhelming Times interview on the Gore candidacy.
 
Act I was called "The Cook, The Thief, His Wife and Her Lover." Ostensibly the tale of the wife of a bloodthirsty crime boss who finds romance with a bland bookseller between courses at her husband's restaurant, it was in fact the Thyestean and moveable -- yet unmoving -- feast of hillary clinton at her husband's sham restitution. (Note the reciprocity. The sham restitution in Act II is all hillary's.)
 
Food, color coding, sex, murder, torture and cannibalism were the exotic (if mostly horizontal) fare in this beautifully filmed but brutally uncompromising modern memoir which passed as ancient fable about nouveau riche rapacity.
Not for the faint at heart, Purple Hearts or queazy stomachs, this depiction of the gross debasement of America was heavily peppered with irony and dark humor throughout.
 
Although she baked no cookies, didn't do illicit land or cattle deals and stood by no man, hillary clinton starred in the triple role of the Cook, the Thief and his Wife. Her lover was played at once vaporously and in workmanlike fashion by the ghost of Eleanor Roosevelt, with Janet Reno, between her stints rendering intermittent injustice for the Husband, as the reliable stand-in. Sidney Blumenthal was the stand-in for the Cook and Craig Livingstone the stand-in for the Thief. The last-minute addition of Christopher Hitchens as the snitch was a stroke of absolute genius notwithstanding its cerebral accident, its predictable-if-perfect pitch and its facile alliteration.
 
Although Act I had no rating, the new clinton soccer-mom directive will require a photo ID for any viewer without independent proof of illegal alien DNC or DNA sequencing.
 
 
In Act II, rabid anti-clinton voters, roughly 33% of the U.S. populace according to as-yet-unpodded pollsters, become increasingly aware that they are disappearing in droves and being replaced by alien pod replicas which have their physical attributes but lack all anti-clinton affect.
 
If Act I was a thinly veiled allegory about naked clintonism, then Act II is a parable about the plan for world domination by the Establishment, aged hippies in pinstripes all, with their infantile, solipsistic world view amazingly untouched by time.

INVASION OF THE BODY SNATCHERS

 


31 posted on 01/24/2002 7:25:19 AM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Because the frequency and intensity of pathetic CYA maneuvers by the clintons and their gang are increasing in direct proportion to the increasing frequency and intensity of editorial comment fingering clinton for 9-11, I suspect clinton CYA-ing will soon reach critical mass.

At that historic, civilization-sparing moment, Sandy Berger (along with his smarmy revisionism) will implode by virtue of one-too-many pressure-deflating "uhs"...taking the two inept, corrupt, cowardly, self-serving Boss-Dweeb dullards down with him.

UHHHHHHHHHH, do ya think they are waiting for some cue cards er sumpin'? I suppose that our first black president will be saying, "Ya see what uhs sayin'."

32 posted on 01/24/2002 7:39:35 AM PST by Angelique
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Mia T. Long, but, ultimately, worth it !

P.S. Here is a statement I made that you can add to your 'art'.

CLINTON - An ex-president that couldn't keep his hands on the TILLER OF THE NATION, because he always had one hand on his privates, and the other in somebody elses' pocket !

33 posted on 01/24/2002 12:26:55 PM PST by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
People who complain about Mia T are jackasses, in my estimation. And they are jackasses because they allow minor considerations (such as bandwidth and repetition) interfere with her brilliant and creative analysis of the chief symbols of the banal evil of our time.

The Clintons are, and will remain, the personification of the trite evil spawned by American/leftist culture: self-absorbed, solipsistic, hateful of democracy in their faux and egotistical sense of moral superiority; peronistas; utterly lacking in humanity. This absurd leftist culture is naive and destructive. It is a powerful culture of ego, destructive to all of us who are not as "smart" as they are.

Mia T brings all this out.

Conservatives on this board indulge themselves, and are not content with being correct ... they must be correct in a stated superior way.

The worst abusers seem to be Christians, who are so often correct, but correct in a way which is stated to call attention to themselves.

Christian culture needs to get real. Christian culture is highly self-absorbed, in all its manifestations, "liberal" and "conservative." There is a deeper message Mia T is giving ... not that she intends it.

Mia is pointing to a phenomenon applicable to us all. It is evil in itself. It is the Clintons, who are a peculiar form of American, truly American, evil.

At the most basic level, it is an evil which says, "Look at me." The spotlight and the celebrity are the primary concern. Conservatives must know that "look at me" is the enemy of themselves and what they know to be true.

Mia, I know, highlights, I know, the mental vacuity of leftists, I know, of whom the Clintons are the prime example. Do you know?

My contention is that the Clintons are Shakespearian in their evil ... subtle, absorbed, bad actors who are slick actors.

Mia T should be encouraged rather than dicouraged, I think.

34 posted on 01/25/2002 10:19:06 PM PST by Urbane_Guerilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Angelique

There were two historians that were on Face the Nation...Goodwin and that other guy they usually have. When the subject turned to Clinton, they both almost called him a buffoon. I wish the subject would have turned to Hillary.

30 posted on 1/24/02 8:14 AM Pacific by Angelique

Q ERTY5 bump!
The other guy" was probably Beshlow (ph).
 
Ever since 9/11, Goodwin & Beshlow-- (sounds like a comedy team, doesn't it?)--have been making the rounds, covering their collective historiographer-posterior regarding their pre-9/11 propping up of the inept, corrupt, or to quote Goodwin, "admittedly unfit," clintons.
 
 
The Forbids 400's argument is shamelessly spurious.
They get all unhinged over the impeachment of clinton,
claiming that it will
"leave the presidency permanently disfigured and diminished,
at the mercy as never before of the caprices of any Congress."
 
Yet they dismiss the real and present--and future!!--danger
to the presidency and the country
of not impeaching and removing
this admittedly unfit, (Goodwin)
"documentably dysfunctional," (NYT)
presidency-diminishing, (Goodwin)
power-abusing,
psychopathic thug.
 
Doris Kearns Goodwin and those 400 other
hog-and-bow-tied-save-clinton,
retrograde-obsessing historiographers
are a supercilious, power-hungry,
egomaniacal lot in their own right.
 
For them, clinton validates
what Ogden Nash merely hypothesized:
Any buffoon can make history,
but only a great man can write it.

Mia T,  History Lesson


35 posted on 01/26/2002 3:06:47 AM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
I love it. Yes, that is the guy, and they do seem like a comedy team. However, THAT day, the "historians" were NOT that pair. Those two would NEVER criticize Clinton.

Of course, do not forget THE historian of our time:

Who ARE these people??
-Al Gore asking who the busts of our Founding Fathers are at Monticello before the Inauguration.

36 posted on 01/26/2002 4:24:35 AM PST by Angelique
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Angelique
Ah, yes, the Muse of Monticello...

Talking about Gore...and hillary...there has been no mention of her co-opting of his stuff...

 
hillary clinton Seizes Algore's Inventions
Refuses to Pay Royalties
by Mia T
 
 

 

 

 

 


37 posted on 01/26/2002 4:45:59 AM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
ROTF Holding my Sides.......What ever happened to AL? I hear he is saying that "A Beautiful Mind" is really written about him.....
38 posted on 01/26/2002 5:38:21 AM PST by Angelique
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson