Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UNFPA Supports Coercion in Vietnam
PRI Weekly Briefing ^ | Feb 1, 2001 | Steve Mosher

Posted on 02/01/2002 8:48:51 AM PST by toenail

Dear Colleague:

PRI has been observing UNFPA operations in Vietnam for several years. We have ample documentation, both from the Vietnamese government and from population experts, demonstrating that UNFPA supports coercive population control in this communist nation. UNFPA itself makes no claims that its operations in Vietnam involve "voluntarism." Clearly, continuing to fund the UNFPA would be a violation of federal law.

Steven W. Mosher
President

PRI Weekly Briefing
1 February 2002
Vol. 4/ No. 4

UNFPA Supports Coercion in Vietnam
By Steve Mosher

In the summer of 1999, a PRI representative visited the headquarters of the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) in Vietnam. The verbal exchange was guarded, but PRI obtained a series of publications from the Hanoi office.

According to these publications, UNFPA operates seven Vietnamese county programs, including programs in Thai Bin and Quang Nam counties.(1) UNFPA efforts in Vietnam "are designed to mobilize the resources and political will required to accomplish stabilization and population growth through a broad range of population and sustainable development initiatives."(2)

How does the "political will" of Vietnam's communist regime-through its National Committee on Population and Family Planning (NCPFP) and the UNFPA-accomplish population "stabilization" in these counties.

In Thai Bin county, women testify that they long to have more than two children, but cannot because of this county's unbending family planning law.(3) Women are forced to use IUDs; punishment for non-compliance includes fines and forced abortion.(4)

In Quang Nam county, another UNFPA county program, entire villages in remote mountain areas inhabited by minorities have been forcibly sterilized. Coercion among minorities in this and other areas is well known. Despite government claims that women of the Montagnard tribe are only subject to fines and incentives, other reports suggest otherwise.(5)

Vietnam's family planning policy is universally coercive, and includes a two-child limit for cadres, manual workers, civil servants, soldiers, families living in a municipality or in the Red River or Mekong Deltas; and birth limitations for ethnic families in northern mountain provinces, Central Highlands and Northwest. Families that have more than the stipulated number of children must contribute "social support funds," or face punishments stipulated by law by management agencies.(6)

Mandatory birth control policies are enforced nationally. Village leaders who successfully implement the national policy are most likely to be promoted to leadership positions in larger administrative units.(7)

Vietnam's family planning policy is coercive. It involves forced abortion and forced sterilization. Abuses against women exist throughout the length and breadth of the country, including those counties where UNFPA operates.

Unlike its China operations-which UNFPA claims are purely voluntary (a claim which is patently false)-UNFPA has made no claim that coercion has been lifted from its county programs in Vietnam. Yet over the decades, UNFPA has spent tens of millions of dollars in Vietnam to strengthen the political will of Vietnam's coercive family planning machine.

Has UNFPA ever condemned Vietnam for coercion? No. Rather the UNFPA heaps on praise: "They have been very successful," Omar Ertur, the UN Population Fund's Representative in Hanoi," was quoted as saying. "They have achieved a tremendous reduction in a very short period of time."(8) Not a word about how this reduction was achieved.

Has UNFPA ever sought to distance itself from coercive family planning in Vietnam? Again the answer is no. Instead, the UNFPA has wholeheartedly embraced the program, singling it out for special honors. The UNFPA presented its "United Nations Population Award" to Vietnam's National Committee for Population and Family Planning in 1999.(9)

Most Americans would be appalled to discover that they have been supporting, with their tax dollars, an organization involved in coercive population control programs. The Kemp-Kasten Amendment, which forbids U.S. funds from going to countries or organizations which participate in the management or support of a program of forced abortion or forced sterilization, was passed by Congress precisely to prevent this kind of misuse of taxpayer dollars. It should be invoked by President Bush. Zero for the UNFPA.

ENDNOTES

1. UNFPA pamphlet, "United Nations System, Vietnam," Hanoi.
2. Ibid.
3. Daniel Goodkind, "Vietnam's One-or-Two Child Policy in Action," Population and Development Review 21(1):85-111 (March) 1995, p. 98-99.
4. Ibid., p. 102.
5. The Montagnard Foundation, "Vietnam Ambassador Admits Sterilizations of Montagnard Hill Tribes: Crime of Genocide: imposing measures to prevent births," Press release, August 2001.
6. "Council of Ministers Decision 162 Concerning a Number of Population and Family Planning Policies," published in Teachers of the People, 5 December 1988; cf. Daniel M. Goodkind, "Vietnam's New Fertility Policy," Population and Development Review 15(1):169-172 (March) 1989, p. 169-172.
7. Goodkind, p. 103.
8. BBC, Owen-Bennett Jones in Hanoi, 8 November 2000, http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/asia-pasific/newsid_1011000/1011799.stm.
9. UNFPA pamphlet, "Vietnam: Key Issues in Population and Development," Hanoi, 1999.


Steve Mosher is the president of Population Research Institute, a non-profit organization dedicated to debunking the myth that the world is overpopulated.

© 2002 Population Research Institute. Permission to reprint granted. Redistribute widely. Credit requested.


PRI hosts the Global Family Life Conference in Santa Clara California, April 3-7, 2002. Check out our website at http://www.pop.org/conferences for more information.
The Population Research Institute is committed to ending human rights abuses committed in the name of "family planning," and to ending counter-productive social and economic paradigms premised on the myth of "overpopulation."


Population Research Institute
1190 Progress Drive, Suite 2D
P.O. Box 1559
Front Royal, VA 22630
USA
http://www.pop.org
Media Contact: Scott Weinberg
540-622-5240, ext. 202


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortionlist; mosher; poporg; populationcontrol; populationinstitute; populationresearch; pri; prolife; stevermosher; unlist

1 posted on 02/01/2002 8:48:51 AM PST by toenail
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *abortion_list; *pro_life; *un_list
indexing
2 posted on 02/01/2002 8:49:48 AM PST by toenail
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: toenail
Communist though it may be, the government of Vietnam is yet fiercely independent of its internal prerogatives, to where it would not likely tolerate any internal manipulation of its social policies, regarding them as its domain, exclusively and absolutely. As laudable as this "advisory's" contention seem, I sniff a Vietnamese expat device attached to it.
3 posted on 02/01/2002 9:43:38 AM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: toenail;kattracks;snow bunny;AuntB;nunya bidness;
What The UN Doesn't Want You To Know

Illinois U.N. Official Predicts New World Order (World Govt Possible Ten Years?)

U.N. Wake-up Call? United Nations Division for Sustainable Development

U.N. Funding battle rages

Does America Have A Future?

4 posted on 02/01/2002 9:51:43 AM PST by B4Ranch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
Bush will be deciding soon whether or not to give UNFPA $34 million. Call now:

The number is (202)456-1414. The White House is prepared to receive the calls. They are taking a tally. You don't need to spend a lot of time on the phone with the person taking the call. Just say "Zero for UNFPA."

5 posted on 02/01/2002 9:56:03 AM PST by IM2Phat4U
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: IM2Phat4U;All
The American Hero already gave them $583,000,000.00 of our tax money this year. What's another 34 million after the 584 ? Remember to pay your taxes this year and support the rapid decline of America.
6 posted on 02/01/2002 10:02:05 AM PST by B4Ranch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
BUMP and thank you.
7 posted on 02/01/2002 10:03:14 AM PST by Snow Bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
The American Hero already gave them $583,000,000.00 of our tax money this year. What's another 34 million after the 584 ? Remember to pay your taxes this year and support the rapid decline of America.

A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step. But before we can get him going in the right direction, we must stop him from going in the wrong direction.

8 posted on 02/01/2002 10:19:25 AM PST by IM2Phat4U
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: toenail
PRI is an organization that does really good work. They are having a conference in early April in Santa Clara(San Francisco Bay Area). There will be a post about it soon, or you could email me if you are interested. The web site has a link, but its on the top and it appears invisible, at least to my computer. I just found out about it this week, but I live in the area.
9 posted on 02/02/2002 5:36:43 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson