Posted on 02/09/2002 9:00:46 AM PST by doug from upland
I enjoy reading the words of the opposition, whether it is a world class Kneepad Knight such as Joe Conason or just a regular RAT voter. If we are to defeat the opposition, we have to understand them.
In addition, I have to collect material to name the next MORON OF THE MONTH on my FReeper radio show. Fortunately, gathering info for MORON consideration is very, very easy to do.
While perusing one of the many areas on the web in which the RATS hide, I came across something so foolish that I had to share it with you. This statement is the epitome of the uninformed fool who believes in style over substance and who had apparently been in a coma for eight years. I think you will enjoy this.
"The Legend of Bill Clinton"
Once upon a time, a Savior of America was born. His name was Bill Clinton. The Evil Ones, the GOP, saw the birth of this remarkable person, and sent their minions scouring the earth to kill him. They knew that if they did not destroy Clinton, then Clinton would one day unite the fractured people of the Democratic party, and rid the world of the evil that is the GOP. Thru 8 years of criminial conduct, the GOP inflicted deep wounds in Clinton. But Clinton is the Savior, and thus destined not to die so easily. We, and all freedom loving peoples, must rally around Bill Clinton, who is a once in a generation man gifted with both the skill and desire to make America a better country. We must not only defend Clinton, but protect him. This means destroying all those who would destroy Clinton. Never forget that the last Savior, JFK, was cut down by forces rooted in the GOP. We're with you, Bill.
====================
How good was that? We may mock the person, and certainly it is justifiable, but we have a greater problem. When you study the issues, when you try to be a good citizen, when you read your voter pamphlet, when you pay attention and listen to the candidates words and what the candidate have written, your diligent efforts are diluted. They are diluted because someone as foolish as the person who wrote the words above will cancel out your vote.
The author of the tripe even begins the word "Savior" with a capital letter. The Biblical reference, whether intended, is obvious. There is a reference that the GOP knew of Sinkmaster's birth and went to the ends of the earth to find him. Huh? All they had to do was go to Hot Springs where he was learning his criminal activity from his uncle. The misguided author also refere to JFK as a "Savior" and implies that the GOP is someone responsible for his death.
This is the continuing problem we face. The author's "Savior" is actually a biting rapist, a perjurer, an obstructor of justice, a witness intimidator, a serial sexual predator, a pervert, a man who for money from Bernie Schwartz allowed the Chinese to leap ahead a generation in missile technology, and a self-centered sociopath. Unfortunately, none of those qualities is seen by the airhead.
Until everyone knows the truth about Bill Clinton, AKA Sinkmaster, we will see more foolish people like this writer look at the scum with admiration. Our work is far from finished.
Priceless.
It looks to me like the disciple already knows that Clinton spent 8 years doing criminal things and that it doesn't matter to him/her/it. parsy the observant.
No citizen from a country with membership on the UN Security Council may be the Secretary General.
So neither Clinton will ever head it, nor will any American, for that matter.
"l'm still drawing strenght from BILL CLINTON "
Thank you, I needed that wonderful story about the great man. His resiliency is unmatched. Had anyone else been spit upon, and treated as badly as this president, they could not have withstood it. He is over extremely strong character.
==============================
How funny is that? Someone is actually proud of Sinkmaster's character.
Either we destroy those 'people' who think like this, or we physically and permanently separate from them.
There is no way that we can survive as a nation united with creatures such as this. To even attempt rapprochement with this filth is an act of naive stupidity.
They will not 'change', they will never see things our way no matter how hard we try to educate them. We might as well try to 'educate' disease organisms not to infect us.
That an occasional liberal is somehow redeemed(?) is utterly irrelevant. We can also put a living horse on the dark side of the moon if we throw enough money and time into the effort. What would such an artificial act have to do with the normal nature and circumstance of the horse?
Nothing.
If we wish to survive, we must either destroy our enemies... (and as sure as God sits on his throne, these creatures are our blood-enemies) Or we must separate from them.
The only alternative is to submit to them...
And submission to the liberals is death.
I should be used the the stupidity of the left by now and nothing should suprise me.
I have to admit this did suprise and sicken me.
MKM
Yes, while world leaders are being kept waiting in the Rose Garden, he is inside our White House, a government place of business, during working hours, playing cigar games with an underling and then finishing himself off in the sink. That was the leader of the Free World? He can have sex on his own time, not while he is supposed to be on duty. He can cheat on his ice queen wife. I don't care. I do care, however, when he is supposed to be on duty as our commander in chief. He is one sick SOB whose problems of his dysfunctional childhood have never been addressed.
Alben made the point over and over that elections are won on just two questions asked by the middle ground voters. And make no mistake middle ground voters decide all elections.
Those two questions that decide all elections are, "What will the candidate do to me if elected?" And "What will the candidate do for me if elected?" If the answer to the first question is nothing. And the answer to the second is a lot, then there will be a landslide win for that candidate. Tip O'Neil said the same thing in different words when he said all elections ar local.
Voters don't give a damn about high taxes or rights unless they are put in personal terms. Reagan was the master at it. His question of, "Why is it better for government to take YOUR money and spend it the way it wants than it is for you to keep YOUR money and spend it the way YOU want." Reagan made taxes about YOU. When the Democrats said they were only going to tax the rich", Reagan said, "The Democrats say they are only going to tax the rich. They define Rich as anyone who has a JOB." Again he put things on a personal basis. The democrats were going to TAX YOU.
Over and over I have posted these simple truths. Yet people in both parties think scandals that do not directly effect voters will destory candidates or parties. Yet nothing in our history shows that to have ever happened. Clinton getting away with Monica is not the exception it is the rule. Jefferson, Cleveland, Harding and Clinton all faced sexual charges made against them. It hurt none of them at the polls. As far as money scandals there have been many of them in our history. They do not hurt a president or pary. The Teapot Dome, the war profiteers in both the Civil and WWII, and the Vicuna coat scandal to name a couple caused no problems for the party or candidate.
Foreign policy problems even treason don't resonate. Alger Hiss and the other traiters caused Harry Truman no problems. Iran contra did not hurt Reagan.
It all comes back to the voter and what is in it for him. Democrats contantly focus on what is in it for the voter as an individual. Republicans focus on what is in it for the nation or society at large.
Republicans preach the benifits of individual freedom as if it were only a gain for the nation as a whole. Democrats push government control and regulation as if it were a benefit of individual freedom.
Until we learn to pitch our views in a way that the middle ground voters will buy, the Democrats will win. The first rule of sales is to always make your pitch in terms the buyer will accept. We tend to make our pitches in terms we accept.
The Right is never about winning it is about being right. The Left is never about being right, it is always about winning. Can you wager a guess as to which side usually wins?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.