TWA Flight 800 - "CAN YOU BELIEVE THIS IS A LIE? I CAN'T"

Accuracy In Media ^ | Reed Irvine

[TomB]

Consistency is too seldom rewarded.

[Rokke]

"The BATTLE OVER THIS ISSUE was waged nearly FIVE YEARS AGO. Why Are YOU STILL HERE???"

I guess I'm a relative newcomer. If you've been waging this battle for 5 years, then I'd suggest you aren't doing a very good job. Since I've been here I've seen most of Donaldson's claims debunked, Rivero nuked into internet wasteland, and now Irvine exposed as a contributor to INaccuracy in media. And now I've witnessed you evolve from a debate coach (post #65) to a ranting, insulting, CAP using grump. Why am I still here? It's kind of interesting to see what guys like you will come up with next.

[Rokke]

"WE'LL LET YOU PRESENT FIRST."

That'll be easy. All I have to do is print out the NTSB report and start reading.

"PS. I hope your a BIG FELLA cause I hate to see ya stuffed head first in PORTA JOHN!!!"

This is either a threat or some kind of indication that the people I'd be reading to are irrational and incapable of responding with intelligent discourse. But I think that is becoming clear already. As for my size, after we've had a beer and shared some cheese curds, I'd be happy to arm wrestle. Loser buys the beer.

[TomB]

poultry bump.

(My wife is making homemade chicken soup for dinner. Coincidence? I think not)

[Rokke]

"Well, Shulze has proven that this data was the product of FOWL PLAY!!"

Are we going with the 4 seconds of missing data or the one second showing a missile explosion. Since both were "proven" by experts, they must both be correct. Except they contradict each other. It is difficult for me to debate you and Magician who both insist their "experts" are correct when that is impossible. Why don't you and Magician have a little mini-debate, and then I'll debate with the winner.

[TomB]

You picture doesn't work.

(kinda like your arguments)

[Rokke]

With regard to your post #35 on the "liar" thread, I'm sure Asmodeus is more than up to the task. But if I were him I'd start with informing you that you seem to have your facts a little off. The CIA video was produced as a request from the FBI and shown during an FBI press conference. It was the culmination of the FBI's participation in the investigation. I am sure that you won't find similar analysis in the NTSB report which Hall was responsible for. In fact, according to an ABCNews article..."The CIA’s theory drew some skepticism from the NTSB panel, called the Witness Group, during the briefing." (http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:_u6ujsTyJawC:abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/TWA800Missile000716.html+twa+800+cia+video&hl=en)

[gunshy]

We are at WAR and it is not appropriate to start flaming the current administration which has to mop up all the effing stinking excrement that Clinton left behind.

Just when is all this mopping up supposed to occur. All that I have seen is a continuing coverup for the previous administration.

[TomB]

Thanks for the feedback ,we farmers are kinda new at html.

Obviously, judging by your liberal use of LARGE fonts, html isn't your problem, it's the website you have your mystery picture on. Goodness, you are confused, aren't you?

Maybe the guys in the black helicopoters closed the server down.

[Rokke]

"If It was PISS POOR work (by the FBI) then WE have to reject it. You see it CORRUPTED the crash investigation"

I've already made clear to you my opinion of the FBI's participation in the investigation. I completely agree with you. Let's follow the NTSB's lead and completely reject the video.