Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Security Council must direct the United States that it may not attack Iraq
http://www.iacenter.org ^ | December 11, 2001 | Ramsey Clark

Posted on 03/06/2002 5:43:47 PM PST by ATOMIC_PUNK

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

1 posted on 03/06/2002 5:43:47 PM PST by ATOMIC_PUNK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
2 posted on 03/06/2002 5:46:05 PM PST by counterrevolutionary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
I think this is an offense worthy of treason charges, or at least a public humiliation/firing. Can he be courtmarshalled? GRRRRRR
3 posted on 03/06/2002 5:46:53 PM PST by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: counterrevolutionary
What you said.
4 posted on 03/06/2002 5:48:08 PM PST by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
It's for sure now...this man has completely lost his mind, he needs someone to help him find it.
6 posted on 03/06/2002 5:49:40 PM PST by Jewels1091
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jewels1091
Ramsey should be kicked out of the U.S and the United Nations right behind him! Screw them both!!
7 posted on 03/06/2002 5:51:47 PM PST by Russ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dighton
The traitorous jackass Clark apparently doesn't know that the US is a permanent member of the Security Council, and would therefore simply veto any such resolution.

But when have lefties ever let their abysmal ignorance of reality get in the way of their lunatic ravings?

It's kind of unfortunate, too, because if the Security Council were to start giving us orders, that might just be the impetus this nation needs to get out of the UN, which I've always considered a good idea, but too unlikely in the short term to merit serious discussion.

8 posted on 03/06/2002 5:53:39 PM PST by counterrevolutionary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
Many hundreds have been killed, including as an illustration of the meaning of such bombing, Leila al Attar, the internationally famous artist, museum director, wife, mother, human being.

You think Ramsey was dating her? This screed is so hysterical and over the top, it's gotta be a personal thing.

9 posted on 03/06/2002 5:54:11 PM PST by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
The sad thing is that the Security Council will give this trash serious consideration.
10 posted on 03/06/2002 5:54:31 PM PST by SKempis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
I guess anyone can send a letter to the ambassador and foreign minister of each member of the UN Security Council and the UN General Assembly.
11 posted on 03/06/2002 5:57:15 PM PST by TaxPayer2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SKempis; all
FReepathon Continues!

GREAT FREEPER QUOTE FROM THE FREEPATHON THREAD:

2366 posted on 3/3/02 6:57 PM Pacific by McGavin999

"A lot of people come to FreeRepublic on a daily basis for their news. Strangely, many of them never stop to think about how this site is paid for. Many have no idea that FreeRepublic is fully funded by the people who use the site.

If everyone who was registered donated $1 a month, we'd never have to have a fund raiser. Unfortunately, that doesn't happen. Some people think their $5 or $10 wouldn't make a difference, but it would."

Have a Heart!
Do Your Part!

12 posted on 03/06/2002 5:57:41 PM PST by Jen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
The Security Council must direct the United States that it may not attack Iraq and must cease threatening to do so.

Try and stop us.

13 posted on 03/06/2002 5:59:11 PM PST by Centurion2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
The Pentagon admits it conducted 110,000 aerial sorties against a defenseless Iraq dropping 88,500 tons of bombs equivalent to 7 1/2 Hiroshima bombs in 42 days from January 17 to February 28, 1991.

DEFENSELESS?!? Gee, I guess all those tracers flying over Baghdad on the night of 17 January were just, um, Muslim festival fireworks! Yeah, that's the ticket! Never mind that the airspace over Iraq was one of the most heavily defended, in terms of AAA and SAMs, in the world!

Will somebody kindly get this senile old man away from a computer before he hurts himself? Dear Lord in Heaven, how a man like this ever held an Executive-branch office in this great country's government, I will never know...

}:-)4

14 posted on 03/06/2002 5:59:37 PM PST by Moose4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SKempis
The sad thing is that the Security Council will give this trash serious consideration.

This was sent on December 11, 2001, and this is the first I've heard of it. I don't think anyone gave it serious consideration--at least not in public.

15 posted on 03/06/2002 6:02:17 PM PST by counterrevolutionary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
Dear Ramsey: I would have written sooner but I couldn't spell PPPPPPPHHHHHUUUUTTTTTT.

Regards, Adrastus.

16 posted on 03/06/2002 6:06:57 PM PST by Adrastus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: counterrevolutionary
I don't think that the political climate would allow the "security council" to act on this in the manner consistent with their leftist, redistributionist, thievin', sorry, ill-mannered, disgusting ways. The general public in the US would then agree with FR in saying:

Get the UN out of the US and the US out of the UN!

17 posted on 03/06/2002 6:16:24 PM PST by meyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Dave Dilegge; KLT; hellinahandcart
Here is an old friend of ours talking SH*T again!!

I guess our journey into the belly of the beast didn't do anything except give them agitta!!

18 posted on 03/06/2002 6:31:52 PM PST by Nitro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
Let's see if I have this right:

Ramsey Clark believes that unless the Security Council passes a resolution barring the United States from attacking Iraq, that the United States can legally do so.

The U.S. is a permanent member of the Security Council, and can veto any resolutions before that body.

And the problem is? Sounds like we have Iraq right where we want them.

Thanks Ramsey!

19 posted on 03/06/2002 6:38:45 PM PST by No Truce With Kings
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meyer
Get the UN out of the US and the US out of the UN!

Get the UN out of the US and the US out of the UN!

Get the UN out of the US and the US out of the UN!

etc., etc., etc.

20 posted on 03/06/2002 6:48:30 PM PST by Pushi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson