Posted on 03/07/2002 1:52:18 PM PST by Stand Watch Listen
Capitol Hill (CNSNews.com) - Republicans and even some Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee Thursday acknowledged that extremely bitter battles surrounding the confirmation of President Bush's judicial nominees are endangering the entire nomination process.
"We're on the verge of an institutional crisis here, and both sides are responsible for it," said Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.). "I fear we are edging toward a place where no one can be confirmed, that we'll all just continue to get more dug in and more partisan and the wheels will grind to a halt."
McConnell made his comments during a committee meeting that was to include a vote on the nomination of Judge Charles Pickering to the Fifth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. The vote was postponed for the second time.
"The last thing on earth I want for this committee and for this Senate and for any future Senate is to have this totally devolve into a tit-for-tat situation where all we do is smear people who we don't like or who differ with us in their opinions," said Utah Republican Orin Hatch, the ranking minority member of the committee. "I'm sick of it and I'd like to end it."
Hatch charges that the "lynching" of Pickering's nomination "is the product of engineering by extreme left Washington special interest groups who are out of touch with the mainstream and have a political axe to grind."
One of those liberal special interest groups distributed a statement at the hearing.
"If the nomination of Judge Pickering is an indication of what we can expect with future Bush administration judicial nominees, then all his candidates should come with a warning label, 'Beware ... May be Hazardous to Women's Health and Civil Right,'" said a statement from Planned Parenthood, the nation's largest abortion provider. "No judicial nominee should be considered unless they affirm a woman's civil and human right to make her own childbearing choices."
But Delaware Democratic Sen. Joseph Biden warned his fellow Democrats to carefully consider their reasons for opposing Pickering at next week's vote.
"I know some from the outside have argued that, because Judge Pickering has personal views relative to abortion different from mine, we should vote against him. I'd be careful what we wish for," Biden cautioned. "Because if it is based ... not upon his judicial rulings but personal beliefs relative to a social issue, when we have a Republican Senate again, it'll be a cold day in hell before we have anybody on the bench who is 'pro-choice.'"
Sen. Arlen Specter (R-Pa.) concurs that Pickering's nomination has, in large measure, deteriorated into a battle over abortion.
"I'm concerned also, that what we have here with Judge Pickering is a warm-up for a later confirmation battle on the Supreme Court. And there's been a suggestion by some on this committee about a litmus test on Roe versus Wade," Specter said. "My 'pro-choice' views are well known, but I have supported nominees who have held different than my own personal views."
Sen. Jon Kyle (R-Ariz.) urged his colleagues to overcome the temptation to judge Pickering on his personal beliefs rather than his judicial qualifications.
"All of us in politics have infinite capacity to rationalize. I believe that all of us look for reasons to oppose someone whose views are politically different from ours, to one degree or another," Kyl admitted. "And, to the degree that we do that, it's not a good thing."
Specter agreed.
"Maybe it's too late for Judge Pickering," he said. "But it's my hope that, without the context of a specific nominee, that we'll declare a truce, an armistice and we'll try to arrive at some protocol."
He reminded his colleagues that their role in the nomination process at the committee level is limited.
"As we all know, the Constitution provides for confirmation by the Senate, not by the Judiciary Committee," Specter said.
New York Democrat Charles Schumer challenged Specter.
"That is a rationale to abolish all committees," Schumer charged. "I fail to see why the committee structure is any more flawed in the selection of judges than it is in any other. I don't think it's flawed."
Biden, however, concurred with Specter's assessment.
"The Constitution does not say the Senate Judiciary Committee shall advise and consent, it says the Senate shall give its advice and consent," he agreed.
Sen. Richard Durbin (D-Ill.) also took issue with the view that the committee process is somehow "broken."
"I would disagree with my colleagues on the committee who suggest that the problem we face today is a failure of the process," Durbin claimed. "The process was very fair to Judge Pickering."
Durbin believes the White House is "testing" the committee to see whether Democrats will approve of a nominee he, Durbin, views as too conservative.
"President Clinton knew that if he sent a nominee to this committee that was not at least moderate to right he didn't have a chance," Durbin charged. "That nominee would never get a hearing. That nominee would never be seriously considered. That nominee was going to have rough sledding at best."
Hatch immediately contradicted Durbin.
"If you think only moderate to conservatives got through, you didn't watch the committee and you didn't watch the Clinton judges," Hatch responded.
Specter suggested that Pickering's nomination be moved to the full Senate for debate and a vote, even if the committee gives him an "unfavorable" recommendation. Earlier this week, Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle (D-S.D.) said such a move would be "unprecedented."
"That's not accurate. There is, in fact, precedent for moving appellate and even district court nominees to the floor for a vote even when they have not received favorable support from this committee," Hatch explained. "Based on our research since 1950, this committee has moved at least six lower court nominees to the floor for consideration either without a recommendation or with a negative recommendation after the committee has voted them down."
The Supreme Court nominations of conservative Judges Clarence Thomas and Robert Bork were also both referred to the Senate after receiving unfavorable votes in the Democratic-controlled Judiciary Committee. Thomas was eventually confirmed as a Supreme Court justice. Bork was rejected.
The committee agreed to hold Pickering's nomination over until March 14.
"We're really at a pretty critical moment here," Sen. Sam Brownback (R-Kan.) observed. "We could wisely use this week to think about, is there another way out of this mess, this train wreck we're headed into, before we get so far down the track that recovery from it becomes pretty tough."
How would You Feel without FR??? Suppose one day you tried to log on and Free Republic wasn’t there?
Where would you get your up to the minute news? How about the live threads as things are happening?
How would you know about the latest Demorat scams, anti-second amendment schemes and all the other liberal, anti-American ploys that are tried every single day?
Insight into world affairs, brilliant wit, sharp retorts, instant information gratification are a few of the things that make FR so vital.
How would you keep on top of things without FR?
How would you know who to contact to complain about the lying politicians, Media Bias, Hollyweirds latest mouth off, sponsors of these idiots, company policies that are unfair and all the other things we need to know to counteract the liberal mindset and the evil plans of liberals?
How would you be part of a Freep?
What would you do without FR????
Freedom isn’t free.
If you enjoy the site and find it a place of like minded Americans to sound off, to get together,
to fight back, to have your voice heard and make a difference, PLEASE CONTRIBUTE NOW! Jim can’t do this alone.
The liberals are sure we won’t be able to keep FR up & running. Prove them wrong. Show them we are indeed united Freepers.
Whether it is $5.00, $50.00 or more, it all adds up. Please send a donation now to Free Republic.
Does it look like 'Doll's Hair'? Sorry that's a location joke (you had to be there) If you get a chance, rent the movie "Return to Me". A guy in the movie(he is one of the screenwriters) has had a hair transplant, and that's the way he describes his new hair.
"Judge Pickering should get Senate approval.
He has been overwhelmingly approved previously by the Senate. He has been approved by the American Bar Association and I believe he is approved of by the majority of the Senate and American electorate.
The Judicial Committee members and Senate members should not judge the judge by whether he agrees with them but by his legal and experience qualifications. Approve Judge Pickering now because he deserves approval. Remove your bias or voters will begin removing you."
Merce Thornberry
"God who gave us life, gave us liberty . Can the liberties of a nation be secure when we have removed a conviction that these liberties are the gift of God? Indeed, I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just and his justice can not sleep forever." -- Thomas Jefferson
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.