Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Shoot-out ends in death of cop,suspect
Chicago Sun-Times ^ | BY FRANK MAIN, FRAN SPIELMAN AND ANDREW HERRMANN STAFF REPORTERS

Posted on 03/20/2002 9:02:11 AM PST by nemo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-203 next last
To: Howlin' Hooligan
Mental illness is not an excuse to kill, but neither is intruding in someones home acceptable.

On the other hand, is mental illness an excuse to ignore six court hearings and a subpoena? I'm not saying that anyone should have been shot and killed - I think it's a shame. However, the two police officers were trying to enforce the law and the orders of the court. The civilian was ignoring those laws, as well as the laws regarding the upkeep and safety of the house.

21 posted on 03/20/2002 9:42:10 AM PST by Tennessee_Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Loopy
"He would bend over backwards to make sure there was no confrontation... he was always prepared." well, busting into someone's home with a sledgehammer is about as confronting as you can get... and not wearing a vest--he wasn't so prepared this time... this was handled terribly... it's almost like the sending the BATF with tanks and machine guns to handle a bunch of cult members waiting for the battle of armegeddon... but on a much smaller scale... very sad, indeed...
22 posted on 03/20/2002 9:43:35 AM PST by latina4dubya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: harpseal
How he maintained or did not maintain his property was nobody's business but his. He was not directly harming any of his neighbors...

That's o.k. in a rural setting where you can't see the next neighbor down the street, or can't see the house from the street. Let his place rot and fall down for all I care. But in a normal urban/suburban setting he is adversely affecting the property values of all of his neighbors. He does NOT have a right to do that!

23 posted on 03/20/2002 9:43:53 AM PST by JimRed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
Now two men are dead because the government didn't know when to stop intruding in people's lives and invading their property.

You are a first class idiot. The old man let his placed go to sh*t, wouldn't take GENEROUS offers of help from anyone, pissed off his neighbors, and then pulled out a gun and murdered a cop who was woing his job well! I'm glad the bastard is dead, but I morn for the cop and his four children. You are a disgrace.

24 posted on 03/20/2002 9:43:58 AM PST by arm958
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TC Rider
About 10 p.m.,

No joke.

25 posted on 03/20/2002 9:50:09 AM PST by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: *Donut Watch;*Gov_Watch;*libertarians

26 posted on 03/20/2002 9:52:05 AM PST by Libertarianize the GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: nemo
"Statism is a religion of peace."
27 posted on 03/20/2002 9:58:14 AM PST by coloradan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimRed
But in a normal urban/suburban setting he is adversely affecting the property values of all of his neighbors. He does NOT have a right to do that!

I am beginning to truly believe that all our constitutional rights are going down the drain due to...fools like you spouting the PROPERTY VALUES right...which does not exist.

28 posted on 03/20/2002 9:58:31 AM PST by Conservababe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
Great summary!
29 posted on 03/20/2002 9:58:41 AM PST by coloradan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nemo
When the cop resorted to force, breaking down the door, he should have been professional enough to know that force might well be met with force.. Too bad anyone died but it is a travesty that we use force on 77 year old people. There had to be another way. Anyone that decries "obey the law", should justify the two deaths, I cannot.
30 posted on 03/20/2002 10:01:22 AM PST by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ninonitti;*bang_list
Usually the elderly person is taken into protective custody and hauled off to a nursing home and sedated while city inspectors loot the place of cash and valubles; then the dumpster shows up and some contractor cousin of another city employee throws a lifetime's worth of possessions away and boards up the property; they lien the property for the work and scoop the real estate through a court appointed "guardian" (usually a politically wired attorney).

Agreed. This is the vicious untold corruption that underlies the Nanny State. You will see this occur more frequently as a certain percentage of the population refuse to relinquish their sovereignty to an increasingly corrupt government.

With all the crack houses and slum lords floating around the city housing authority just "happens" to pick on a self sustaining older citizen who asks only to be let alone for the housing equivalent of spitting on the sidewalk.

Look at what happened here- an elderly man successfully (partially) defended himself against a home invasion conducted after dark with a .22 pistol?

Absolutely, this stinks to high heaven. Best regards,

31 posted on 03/20/2002 10:01:22 AM PST by Copernicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: arm958
The old man let his placed go to sh*t....

So letting one's own place go to sh*t should be a jailable offense?

32 posted on 03/20/2002 10:01:28 AM PST by Hard Case
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: nemo
I can see some thirsty lawyer getting ready to argue that the lederly gentleman had some syndrome that kept him from ging outside.
33 posted on 03/20/2002 10:04:45 AM PST by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nemo
Wow, what salty shooting by a 77 year old.
34 posted on 03/20/2002 10:05:05 AM PST by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimRed
Perhaps you are correct. However does the STATE have the right to bring forth a situation that causes the two deaths.

My neighbors house needs painting, maybe the "STATE" should apply some strongarm pressure on her to get it done. She cannot afford it but that gives her no right to not paint it. Maybe they can haul her into court a few times, serves her right.

35 posted on 03/20/2002 10:07:22 AM PST by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: nemo
Why are we doing a "dynamic entry" over a housing court subpoena?
36 posted on 03/20/2002 10:07:42 AM PST by Redcloak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317
and I have some syndrome that doesn't catch typos on the first preview... D'oh!

(Can I sue someone for that?)

37 posted on 03/20/2002 10:13:31 AM PST by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak
He was refusing to submit to authority... among the worst offenses, in the eyes of many. (Not me)
38 posted on 03/20/2002 10:14:58 AM PST by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Joe Hadenuf
Not supposed to. That's solely(meaning other courts are pre-empted) John Ashcroft's job. I've been studying Immigration Law lately and I can say that with certainty.
39 posted on 03/20/2002 10:16:28 AM PST by Loopy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
Spot on appraisal of the situation, at least as gleaned from the article.

It used to be that the 'cranky old neighbor' was left alone to live out his life, but we have all become so inured to the vagaries of the state that some (even on FR) see this as a case where the police and the courts did the right thing. WRONG!

Anyone that cannot see that the police and courts had no damn business messing with a property owner (kookie or not) who did nothing to harm anyone else (property values are not justification for this!) should have their head examined ... they are way more dangerous than a 77 year old man living out his life in his home.

40 posted on 03/20/2002 10:18:31 AM PST by spodefly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-203 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson